Renault: Red Bull 'wrong' about Formula 1 engine developments plans
Renault says Red Bull's communication of its Formula 1 engine development plans has been "wrong"
After the 2017 season-opening Australian Grand Prix, Red Bull said it expected to have to wait until the Canadian GP in June for a major Renault upgrade - which it feels is key to it moving forward this season.
Renault Sport managing director Cyril Abiteboul said earlier this month that due to concerns about reliability, the plan is to introduce the upgrade before the end of July.
When asked about Renault's engine update plan, Abiteboul told Autosport: "Frankly, what I want to play down is this sort of focus on the upgrade because the engine is improving every weekend.
"We said reliability was the main issue to the performance delivery and improvement and that is exactly the case.
"I give you a clear example: we had better reliability.
"We just completed a programme on the dyno [in the Spanish GP week] and on Saturday afternoon there was immediately mapware for all three teams.
"It's not black and white, we haven't suddenly jumped Mercedes in terms of power delivery, but that is small improvement.
"There will be more to come in Monaco and there will be more to come when we introduce power unit number three again.
"Red Bull, as always, is making wrong communication about performance development.
"But what I can guarantee you is, race-by-race, the engine will improve and overall in the season, if you look at the engine software, hardware and also the fuel and lubricants coming from our petroleum partner, I'm sure there is a very decent step to come."
Renault remains uncertain when it will introduce its revised 2017 MGU-K.
The older specification is 5kg heavier and requires an extra 1kg air bottle for cooling, but weight has become less of a concern for teams.
Abiteboul said "an option could be to introduce that with power unit number three".
He added: "Weight was maybe a concern at the start of the season, but as always, most teams have dealt with that.
"The only thing that MGU-K is bringing is a bit less weight, but it's not something too pressing."
Abiteboul also said Renault is aiming to come close to eradicating the deficit to Mercedes power by the end of the season before getting on par with its rival over the course of next year.
"The gap to be fully closed, it's not going to happen this year," he said.
"We think it's something for next year, but having said that, we think the step we are planning to make, which we have on the shelf for this year, is going to almost close it completely in the course of the season.
"We already have a very clear idea of next year's engine and the aim we have is to completely close the gap in the course of next season."
Previous article
Nico Hulkenberg: Ferrari, Mercedes' margin over F1 rivals 'scary'
Next article
Indy 500 has improved Fernando Alonso's mindset for F1 - McLaren
The ‘backwards step’ that is the right move for Formula 1
OPINION: With its days apparently numbered, the MGU-H looks set to be dropped from Formula 1’s future engine rules in order to entice new manufacturers in. While it may appear a change of direction, the benefits for teams and fans could make the decision a worthwhile call
The floundering fortunes of F1’s many Lotus reboots
Team Lotus ceased to exist in 1994 - and yet various parties have been trying to resurrect the hallowed name, in increasingly unrecognisable forms, ever since. DAMIEN SMITH brings GP Racing’s history of the legendary team to an end with a look at those who sought to keep the flame alive in Formula 1
Why the 2021 title fight is far from F1's worst, despite its toxic background
OPINION: Formula 1 reconvenes for the Russian Grand Prix two weeks after the latest blow in ‘Max Verstappen vs Lewis Hamilton’. While the Silverstone and Monza incidents were controversial, they thankfully lacked one element that so far separates the 2021 title fight from the worst examples of ugly championship battles
How F1’s other champion to emerge from 1991 thrived at Lotus
Mika Hakkinen became Michael Schumacher’s biggest rival in Formula 1 in the late-90s and early 2000s, having also made his F1 debut in 1991. But as MARK GALLAGHER recalls, while Schumacher wowed the world with a car that was eminently capable, Hakkinen was fighting to make his mark with a famous team in terminal decline
The forgotten F1 comeback that began Jordan’s odyssey
Before Michael Schumacher – or anyone else – had driven the 191 (or 911 as it was initially called), Eddie Jordan turned to a fellow Irishman to test his new Formula 1 car. JOHN WATSON, a grand prix winner for Penske and McLaren, recalls his role in the birth of a legend…
The squandered potential of a 70s F1 underdog
A podium finisher in its first outing but then never again, the BRM P201 was a classic case of an opportunity squandered by disorganisation and complacency, says STUART CODLING
The other notable Monza escape that F1 should learn from
OPINION: The headlines were dominated by the Italian Grand Prix crash between Max Verstappen and Lewis Hamilton, who had the halo to thank for avoiding potentially serious injury. But two days earlier, Formula 1 had a lucky escape with a Monza pitlane incident that could also have had grave consequences
How Monza only added more questions to F1's sprint race conundrum
With two sprint races under its belt, Formula 1 must now consider its options for them going forward. While they've helped deliver exciting racing on Sundays, the sprints themselves have been somewhat lacking - creating yet another conundrum for F1 to solve...
