What F1's rule book says on Aston Martin's Red Bull clone

Aston Martin's revealing of a Red Bull copy has been the biggest talking point of Formula 1's Spanish Grand Prix weekend so far.

What F1's rule book says on Aston Martin's Red Bull clone

While the Silverstone-based team had been open in recent weeks that a major revamp was coming, few had been expecting it to have adopted much of the concept that Red Bull has put to use so far with the RB18.

But while even Red Bull has admitted that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, and teams have long copied each other's ideas in grand prix history, F1's rule book has got stricter in recent years about such behaviour.

And ironically it was Aston Martin's own actions, when it competed under the Racing Point moniker, that means things are much more strongly regulated now.

Read Also:

Back in 2020, Racing Point caused a big controversy when it ran a straight copy of the previous year's Mercedes W10.

Its actions triggered complaints from rivals and, following a protest from Renault, Racing Point was found guilty of having illegally used Mercedes' design IP with its rear brake ducts.

The FIA handed the team a €400,000 fine and docked it 15 constructors' championship points for its actions.

Beyond the specifics of the case, Racing Point's action prompted a wider debate in the sport about whether or not F1 risked damaging itself if teams suddenly felt their best way of achieving success was to copy other designs.

It was agreed that such a scenario should not happen and the FIA was mandated to come up with a series of regulations to limit the scope for car clones.

As the FIA's head of single-seater matters, Nikolas Tombazis said at the time: "This will prevent teams from using extensive part of photos to copy whole portions of other cars in the way that Racing Point has done.

Lance Stroll, Aston Martin AMR22

Lance Stroll, Aston Martin AMR22

Photo by: Carl Bingham / Motorsport Images

"We will still accept individual components to be copied in local areas, but we don't want the whole car to be fundamentally a copy of another car."

The new rules which came into force for the following season, and were carried through to the all-new 2022 rule book, banning the sharing of any IP between outfits, and outlawing the 'reverse engineering' of any listed parts on cars.

While teams could be "influenced by the design or concept of a Competitors' design", they could only do so by "using information that must potentially be available to all Competitors".

Such knowledge can only be gained at race and test events, so no work on this front can be done away from the track.

Article 17.3.3 of the 2022 F1 regs outlines where the line is crossed in terms of teams going too far in their bid to copy other ideas.

It specifically outlaws:

1) The use of photographs or images, combined with software that converts them to point clouds, curves, surfaces, or allows CAD geometry to be overlaid onto or extracted from the photograph or image

2) The use of stereophotogrammetry, 3D cameras or any 3D stereoscopic techniques c. Any form of contact or non-contact surface scanning

3) Any technique that projects points or curves on a surface so as to facilitate the reverse-engineering process

Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing RB18

Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing RB18

Photo by: Zak Mauger / Motorsport Images

While the movement of staff is something that has happened for years, and Aston Martin has taken some key Red Bull figures including its new technical director Dan Fallows, the FIA rules are also clear that no direct information can be moved across from rivals.

This information includes (but is not limited to), data, design, drawings, or any other Intellectual Property.

However, in F1, there is no way of stopping ideas that one designer has in his head about a car philosophy and implementing it for another team.

The rules do say, however, that if there are occasions when there are big similarities between listed components on different cars, the FIA has to right to investigate the matter and will ask teams to prove that the design was done independently.

Teams will be asked to provide data and information to prove that they have complied with the rules and designed components themselves from scratch.

The regulations state: "It will be the role of the FIA to determine whether this resemblance is the result of reverse engineering or of legitimate independent work."

That is exactly what has happened in the Aston Martin case, with the FIA being alerted about there being potential similarities between the AMR22 upgrades and the Red Bull RB18.

The FIA moved quickly on Friday to say that it had investigated the Aston Martin parts and, following analysis of data from both teams, it was satisfied that no breach of the regulations took place.

For now, Red Bull has limited itself to suggesting that any transfer of IP would be a "serious concern", but you can be sure it will be double checking the details in the days to come to ensure that no direct information got out of Milton Keynes and found its way to Silverstone.

shares
comments

Related video

F1 Grand Prix practice results: Leclerc fastest on Spanish GP Friday
Previous article

F1 Grand Prix practice results: Leclerc fastest on Spanish GP Friday

Next article

Hamilton: Mercedes "way better" as F1 upgrades dial out porpoising

Hamilton: Mercedes "way better" as F1 upgrades dial out porpoising
The crucial tech changes F1 teams must adapt to in 2023 Plus

The crucial tech changes F1 teams must adapt to in 2023

Changes to the regulations for season two of Formula 1's ground-effects era aim to smooth out last year’s troubles and shut down loopholes. But what areas have been targeted, and what impact will this have?

Are these the 50 quickest drivers in F1 history? Plus

Are these the 50 quickest drivers in F1 history?

Who are the quickest drivers in Formula 1 history? LUKE SMITH asked a jury of experienced and international panel of experts and F1 insiders. Some of them have worked closely with F1’s fastest-ever drivers – so who better to vote on our all-time top 50? We’re talking all-out speed here rather than size of trophy cabinet, so the results may surprise you…

Formula 1
Jan 25, 2023
One easy way the FIA could instantly improve F1 Plus

One easy way the FIA could instantly improve F1

OPINION: During what is traditionally a very quiet time of year in the Formula 1 news cycle, FIA president Mohammed Ben Sulayem has been generating headlines. He’s been commenting on massive topics in a championship that loves them, but also addressing necessary smaller changes too. Here we suggest a further refinement that would be a big boon to fans

Formula 1
Jan 24, 2023
How can McLaren keep hold of Norris? Plus

How can McLaren keep hold of Norris?

Lando Norris is no longer the young cheeky-chappy at McLaren; he’s now the established ace. And F1's big guns will come calling if the team can’t give him a competitive car. Here's what the team needs to do to retain its prize asset

Formula 1
Jan 24, 2023
What difference did F1's fastest pitstops of 2022 make? Plus

What difference did F1's fastest pitstops of 2022 make?

While a quick pitstop can make all the difference to the outcome of a Formula 1 race, most team managers say consistency is more important than pure speed. MATT KEW analyses the fastest pitstops from last season to see which ones – if any – made a genuine impact

Formula 1
Jan 23, 2023
When F1 ‘holiday’ races kept drivers busy through the winter Plus

When F1 ‘holiday’ races kept drivers busy through the winter

Modern Formula 1 fans have grown accustomed to a lull in racing during winter in the northern hemisphere. But, as MAURICE HAMILTON explains, there was a time when teams headed south of the equator rather than bunkering down in the factory. And why not? There was fun to be had, money to be made and reputations to forge…

Formula 1
Jan 20, 2023
What Porsche social media frenzy says about F1’s manufacturer allure Plus

What Porsche social media frenzy says about F1’s manufacturer allure

Porsche whipped up a frenzy thanks to a cryptic social media post last week and, although it turned out to be a false alarm, it also highlighted why manufacturers remain such an important element in terms of the attraction that they bring to F1. It is little wonder that several other manufacturers are bidding for a slice of the action

Formula 1
Jan 19, 2023
Why the new Williams boss shouldn’t avoid ‘Mercedes B-team’ comparisons Plus

Why the new Williams boss shouldn’t avoid ‘Mercedes B-team’ comparisons

OPINION: Williams has moved to replace the departed Jost Capito by appointing former Mercedes chief strategist James Vowles as its new team principal. But while he has sought to play down the idea of moulding his new squad into a vision of his old one, some overlap is only to be expected and perhaps shouldn't be shied away from

Formula 1
Jan 17, 2023