Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

How GM tech accelerated Cadillac's F1 entry

Formula 1
Canadian GP
How GM tech accelerated Cadillac's F1 entry

MotoGP chief defends officiating of Catalan GP

MotoGP
Barcelona Official Testing
MotoGP chief defends officiating of Catalan GP

The F1 power unit formula solution that could suit all parties

Feature
Formula 1
The F1 power unit formula solution that could suit all parties

How Aprilia's Barcelona collapse showed the pressures of leading MotoGP's title race

Feature
MotoGP
Barcelona Official Testing
How Aprilia's Barcelona collapse showed the pressures of leading MotoGP's title race

Title-winning BTCC Peugeot and Harvey in an MG among Touring Car Rewind: North highlights

National
Title-winning BTCC Peugeot and Harvey in an MG among Touring Car Rewind: North highlights

MotoGP Barcelona test: Acosta fastest as rain curtails running early

MotoGP
Barcelona Official Testing
MotoGP Barcelona test: Acosta fastest as rain curtails running early

Why this year's Indy 500 isn't as straightforward to call as you might expect

Feature
IndyCar
110th Running of the Indianapolis 500
Why this year's Indy 500 isn't as straightforward to call as you might expect

Will Mercedes or McLaren land the next punch at F1's Canadian GP?

Formula 1
Canadian GP
Will Mercedes or McLaren land the next punch at F1's Canadian GP?

Ferrari's Las Vegas experiment that offers clues to 2025 push

Ferrari did something unusual in Las Vegas with a floor experiment in practice

Carlos Sainz, Ferrari SF-24

Giorgio Piola's F1 technical analysis

Giorgio Piola is the preeminent Formula 1 technical journalist. Born in Genoa, Italy, Giorgio has covered the F1 World Championship since 1969, producing thousands of illustrations that have been reproduced in the world’s most prestigious motor racing publications.

Ferrari kick-started its 2025 plans in a public way at the Las Vegas Grand Prix as it ran a new floor that was purely experimental and was never actually intended to be raced with now.

It ran on Carlos Sainz’s SF-24 during free practice in a bid to help the Scuderia gather some vital information that can help its understanding in bringing the perfect floor design for next season.

The gap between the real world and simulations has never been wider than with this generation of cars, with the floor and its ancillary components the most difficult of those to master.

Most of the grid has, at one point or another, written off a new development stream during this regulation set, as it has not delivered the performance that had been expected. Ferrari itself fell foul of a floor that introduced high-speed bouncing from the Spanish GP.

So it is no surprise that the Scuderia used its Las Vegas development to act as a valuable learning tool to see if the information coming out of its refurbished wind tunnel is good enough to translate to the track.

Ferrari SF-24 floor comparison

Ferrari SF-24 floor comparison

Photo by: Giorgio Piola

The experimental floor is interesting for a number of reasons.

There is not one specific design avenue that was adjusted, rather it was an all-encompassing refresh that covered the floor fences, forward expansion of the underfloor, the floor’s edge and the sidewall of the diffuser ramp.

However, one aspect that’s perhaps more intriguing than the rest is the design of the edge wing, as it is one we’ve seen from Ferrari before, both in 2022 and 2023.

But, the team saw fit to head in a different direction when it couldn’t quite unlock the performance it expected to deliver.

The slender L-shaped rear section to the edge wing has been seen on other cars too, suggesting that it’s a solution that looks good by the numbers but perhaps requires other pieces of the jigsaw puzzle all to fit together to get the absolute most from it.

For example, this variant not only has a flatter surface relative to the ground along its length, but it also requires adaptations be made to the metal support brackets, as the degree of flexibility needed from it may vary somewhat when compared to the current solution.

Of course, we won’t know the full extent of the changes that have been made to this floor, as there’s clearly a set of corresponding alterations made to the underfloor, which aren’t visible to us.

Ferrari SF-24 front wing, Las Vegas GP, Italian GP comparison

Ferrari SF-24 front wing, Las Vegas GP, Italian GP comparison

Photo by: Giorgio Piola

Ferrari’s other change for Las Vegas was a minor alteration to its front wing, whereby the trailing edge of the upper flap was trimmed more than it was at Monza.

This is aimed at offering a better balance for the car as well as a boost to straightline speed.

Paired with this was Ferrari's lowest-downforce rear wing assembly, which the team used at Monza, alongside a single-element, short-chord beam wing.

Ferrari SF-24 rear view comparison, Las Vegas GP

Ferrari SF-24 rear view comparison, Las Vegas GP

Photo by: Giorgio Piola

In the side-by-side comparison it’s clear that whilst the car does appear to be set-up in a similar manner to Monza aerodynamically speaking, the approach was distinctly different when it came to cooling.

The engine cover louvres were more closed in Las Vegas, owing to the lower temperatures.

Read Also:
Previous article Mario Andretti named as director on board of General Motors F1 team
Next article The three performance-boosting factors that surprised Mercedes in Las Vegas

Top Comments

Latest news