Ferrari defends using its F1 rules veto over engine prices
Ferrari team boss Maurizio Arrivabene said his team chose to veto plans to impose a maximum price on a Formula 1 engine and gearbox package purely for business reasons
The FIA wants to introduce a budget engine as a viable alternative to run alongside the 1.6-litre V6 turbo engines which were introduced at the start of 2014.
It emerged that Ferrari used its right of veto at the last Strategy Group meeting when it was suggested Mercedes, Ferrari and Renault should reduce the amount they charge customers.
But Arrivabene said it is unreasonable to ask the manufacturers to lower their prices after they have already committed the finances for development.
"We just exercised our commercial right as a powertrain manufacturer," said Arrivabene on Ferrari's use of its veto.
"If someone is asking you to produce a specification, you produce that specification.
"If then someone says 'OK, we want you to reduce the price', what are we going to do?
"It's not a position against the other teams, it's a position defending commercial principle. We're open to find any other solution.
"If you are a public company as we are or a company as Mercedes is, you have research and development costs which is something you have to recover.
"I don't know any commercial entity giving produce out for free or at cost. This is a the principle.
"We are not applying the veto at every single meeting. If we do it, we think a lot about it.
"We do it if in our opinion it is necessary to do it. The last one was applied by [ex-Ferrari boss] Jean Todt many years ago."
When asked for his opinion on Ferrari's decision to use its veto, Mercedes team principal Toto Wolff said he understood the Scuderia's standpoint.
"This is a controversial topic and as many things, black and white is not the answer," said Wolff.
"There is a set of rules which were implemented in F1 two years ago.
"We started developing those engines three, four, five years ago based on that set of rules.
"You have to calculate how much you can charge for those engines, how much [money] you can recover for those engines.
"It is difficult as a commercial entity in a situation where a price is being imposed.
"I understand Ferrari's standpoint and also understand that it's a difficult situation for some of smaller teams.
"We will remain committed to cost reduction."
Previous article
F1 is set for a clash of the titans
Next article
Mexican GP: Jenson Button surprised by McLaren-Honda's pace
The times that suggest Verstappen should be confident of F1 Russian GP recovery
For the second race in a row, Mercedes has ended the first day of track action on top. It’s in a commanding position at the Russian Grand Prix once again – this time largely thanks to Max Verstappen’s upcoming engine-change grid penalty. But there’s plenty to suggest all hope is not lost for the championship leader at Sochi
The ‘backwards step’ that is the right move for Formula 1
OPINION: With its days apparently numbered, the MGU-H looks set to be dropped from Formula 1’s future engine rules in order to entice new manufacturers in. While it may appear a change of direction, the benefits for teams and fans could make the decision a worthwhile call
The floundering fortunes of F1’s many Lotus reboots
Team Lotus ceased to exist in 1994 - and yet various parties have been trying to resurrect the hallowed name, in increasingly unrecognisable forms, ever since. DAMIEN SMITH brings GP Racing’s history of the legendary team to an end with a look at those who sought to keep the flame alive in Formula 1
Why the 2021 title fight is far from F1's worst, despite its toxic background
OPINION: Formula 1 reconvenes for the Russian Grand Prix two weeks after the latest blow in ‘Max Verstappen vs Lewis Hamilton’. While the Silverstone and Monza incidents were controversial, they thankfully lacked one element that so far separates the 2021 title fight from the worst examples of ugly championship battles
How F1’s other champion to emerge from 1991 thrived at Lotus
Mika Hakkinen became Michael Schumacher’s biggest rival in Formula 1 in the late-90s and early 2000s, having also made his F1 debut in 1991. But as MARK GALLAGHER recalls, while Schumacher wowed the world with a car that was eminently capable, Hakkinen was fighting to make his mark with a famous team in terminal decline
The forgotten F1 comeback that began Jordan’s odyssey
Before Michael Schumacher – or anyone else – had driven the 191 (or 911 as it was initially called), Eddie Jordan turned to a fellow Irishman to test his new Formula 1 car. JOHN WATSON, a grand prix winner for Penske and McLaren, recalls his role in the birth of a legend…
The squandered potential of a 70s F1 underdog
A podium finisher in its first outing but then never again, the BRM P201 was a classic case of an opportunity squandered by disorganisation and complacency, says STUART CODLING
The other notable Monza escape that F1 should learn from
OPINION: The headlines were dominated by the Italian Grand Prix crash between Max Verstappen and Lewis Hamilton, who had the halo to thank for avoiding potentially serious injury. But two days earlier, Formula 1 had a lucky escape with a Monza pitlane incident that could also have had grave consequences
