Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Why Nurburgring 24 Hours agony may motivate Verstappen to return

Endurance
Why Nurburgring 24 Hours agony may motivate Verstappen to return

Final Catalan GP results as five riders penalised and Mir loses MotoGP podium

MotoGP
Catalan GP
Final Catalan GP results as five riders penalised and Mir loses MotoGP podium

Acosta slams Catalan GP calls: “It’s awful we acted as if nothing happened”

MotoGP
Catalan GP
Acosta slams Catalan GP calls: “It’s awful we acted as if nothing happened”

DS Penske solid despite frustrating finish in Monaco E-Prix

Formula E
Monaco ePrix II
DS Penske solid despite frustrating finish in Monaco E-Prix

Formula E Monaco E-Prix: Rowland reignites title challenge with first win of 2025-26

Formula E
Monaco ePrix II
Formula E Monaco E-Prix: Rowland reignites title challenge with first win of 2025-26

MotoGP Catalan GP: Di Giannantonio wins chaotic Barcelona race

MotoGP
Catalan GP
MotoGP Catalan GP: Di Giannantonio wins chaotic Barcelona race

Nurburgring 24 Hours: Mercedes win despite late failure for Verstappen Racing

Endurance
Nurburgring 24 Hours: Mercedes win despite late failure for Verstappen Racing

How F1's ADUO system works

Feature
Formula 1
How F1's ADUO system works

F1 bosses warned of risks of rules overhaul for 2017 season

Senior team figures believe Formula 1's decision-makers must avoid making sweeping rule changes amid plans for a revolutionary overhaul in 2017

F1 chiefs want to revamp the sport within the next two years to improve its public appeal, with plans for a return to 1000bhp engines among the goals.

However, Williams performance chief Rob Smedley argues that not only is the current standard of racing "very good" but a major regulation change will only serve to benefit teams with bigger budgets and not necessarily improve the show.

"We need to leave it alone in the main," said Smedley.

"We should perhaps think about stopping tampering with it rather than thinking we are going to create a new set of rules that is going to fix everything.

"Every time you create new rules, you'll usually find the people with bigger resources, the cleverest thinking or those who stop working on the current generation of Formula 1 cars come out with a big gap.

"We do have to seriously think about not changing everything. The racing is very good.

"We have Ferrari and Mercedes and that's making for some good races. Behind them, there is some good racing."

Lotus technical director Nick Chester agreed with Smedley, adding that a major rule change will actually widen the field rather than result in closer racing.

"People forget the racing is quite good," he said. "The cars are improving, we're seeing two seconds improvement from last year, so do we really need a huge change of regulation?

"It is going to open up the grid again, there will be bigger differences between teams and it will also add a lot of cost.

"We should not forget that the show is actually not bad at the moment."

Mercedes boss Paddy Lowe said that while drastic changes are not needed, changes to the sporting regulations could be made to improve the show at minimal cost.

"In terms of rules changes, it's not absolutely clear we need to change the cars radically," he said.

"Performance will increase anyway through normal development.

"An interesting area is in the sporting regulations. There are a lot of things we can do to improve show without spending a whole of lot of money.

"We have been discussing the use of tyres and how they are allocated.

"We're on the look-out for people to come out with ideas but I still say that in my view, the sport isn't in bad shape."

Previous article F1 Spanish GP: Vettel says Mercedes still has a gap to Ferrari
Next article Spanish Grand Prix FIA Friday press conference transcript

Top Comments