Why Paul Ricard's last grand prix was a defining F1 tech moment

Formula 1 returns to Paul Ricard this weekend after an absence of 28 years - a period in which the championship's technology and sophistication level have been revolutionised

Why Paul Ricard's last grand prix was a defining F1 tech moment

But while the 2018 F1 cars are a world away from those that took the grid at the 1990 French Grand Prix, the Ferrari and Leyton House March that fought for victory at Ricard back then featured then-radical ideas that are now standard.

The two cars were totally different in concept, and both featured design elements that opened up new avenues for F1 teams and quickly became accepted practice.

The Ferrari of Alain Prost was based on 1989's John Barnard-designed 639, which was a milestone in F1 technical history.

The 639 pioneered the semi-automatic gearbox in F1, and also had completely different aerodynamics.

In addition, it featured front and rear torsion bars instead of springs - setting a trend that now features on all cars.

The Leyton House driven by Ivan Capelli was based on Adrian Newey's 1988 March, which was an extreme car aerodynamically.

It was so extreme that the contours of the chassis were built around the shape of the drivers' feet. It was really the start of F1's move towards incredibly complicated aerodynamics.

The Ferrari and the Leyton House also had a completely different philosophy in terms of building the chassis.

Ferrari's carbon fibre chassis was separate from the bodywork, which was attached.

The Leyton House was part of a new generation of thinking, where the chassis also made up the bodywork as it does with the current cars.

These were two cutting edge but totally different cars, featuring elements still important to F1 28 years on.

With help from Gary Anderson, we look in more detail about the specific design elements of the two cars.

The Ricard race was won by Prost after passing Capelli late on when the Italian suffered a brief drop in fuel pressure.

What is striking is the growing complexity of the aerodynamics that now make it so difficult for cars to overtake.

The Ferrari 641 was a Barnard-designed car, with Henri Durand leading the aerodynamics team, and it shows how much things have moved on.

The sidepods are long and sleek, whereas currently the design objective is to get them as short as possible to allow more room for the multiple twisted turning vanes that are now called bargeboards.

The undercut sidepods hadn't come in back in 1990, so the trend was for tall and narrow radiator inlets.

The front wing is minimal, with just two elements, and the diffuser in those days was much more powerful.

The current cars produce something like 1600kg of downforce at 240km/h (149mph), and the Jordan we raced in 1991 had about half of that - although we weren't a Ferrari beater and were happy to just get one over on the big teams if they had a bad day that year.

The underbody layouts of the cars are fairly similar. From the front, you have the chassis, fuel tank, engine and gearbox but now the underbody detail is so much more refined.

I remember Williams design legend Patrick Head in 1998 standing on the grid at Barcelona and, still with his headset on, turning around to colleague Geoff Willis and shouting at the top of his voice: "Geoff, underbody aerodynamics, that's where we've failed, underbody aerodynamics".

Williams had qualified just beside us and we were having a difficult time, so you can imagine how bad it was for Williams.

But he was right, now the underbody aerodynamics are as important as what the outside body surfaces look like. That was in 1998 and huge strides have been made since then.

It's also interesting comparing the front wing to what we now see on the Red Bull, very different but I think you can see it comes from the same family.

Ferrari was the first team to introduce the paddleshift gearshift system, which was introduced on 1989's 640 and then used on the 641.

It was a Barnard creation and Ferrari started testing it during the second half of 1988. My Formula 3000 driver at Bromley Motorsport, Roberto Moreno, was hired to do the test work and the system then was quite different to what is used today.

Ferrari took more or less a normal gearbox with three selector rods and fitted electrical solenoids at the end of the selector rods.

The paddles would simply energise the solenoid and move it one way or the other, so the paddle was more of a see-saw so you could push or pull it.

Now, the gearshift is more like a motorcycle with a barrel gearchange system.

One actuator basically rotates the barrel a certain number of degrees so it goes from one gear to another.

With the current zero-torque loss system (seamless shift) it is a little more complicated than that but then so is everything else.

That's because the teams now have at least tenfold more in manpower. In 1991 we had about 30 people at Jordan, now there are in excess of 300 of Force India while Ferrari probably had 100 people in 1990.

It was 1993 before we, at Jordan, entered into the world of the paddleshift system and like everyone else it wasn't without its problems, but by the end of the season we had more or less got on top of it.

When the paddleshift was working correctly, it was a lot easier on the driver, who didn't have to take their hands off the steering wheel and it reduced the risk of a missed gear blowing up the engine.

It was a good thing, but it also meant there is now zero chance of missing a gearchange so it takes away the potential for that little driver error that in the past has led to so many overtaking manoeuvres.

This cutaway of the Ferrari 641 shows in more detail the car in its second iteration, which was introduced for the San Marino GP at Imola.

The nose had a sharper point, with a shorter panel covering its top.

The upper lip of the cooling air intake had a more rounded shape above the lower part of the intake, while the radiators were taller.

There was also a new lateral outlet and larger fuel-system air intakes.

Ferrari also modified the pick-up points for the rear suspension and introduced a new undertray.

Newey's famously aggressive packaging meant that the confines of the Leyton House cockpit were very tight.

This shows the design of the March 881, used by the team in 1988 before its name changed, and things were very similar for the 1990 car.

"It was small," says Capelli of the 1988 car. "The steering wheel was just 25cm across and the whole bulkhead that you had to put your legs through was 25cm.

"With three pedals, it was so tight that there was no footrest, which was a real problem in some corners.

"The first time I drove, I couldn't reach the gear lever because it was too far back.

"Adrian said 'wait there', took the gear lever out and I could hear hammering at the back of the garage.

"He came back with the lever bent forward."

shares
comments
Three Formula 1 teams have tried to sign Lando Norris from McLaren
Previous article

Three Formula 1 teams have tried to sign Lando Norris from McLaren

Next article

Montezemolo: Marchionne jealous of Ferrari's past F1 successes

Montezemolo: Marchionne jealous of Ferrari's past F1 successes
How Ferrari’s Monaco headache became its Silverstone migraine Plus

How Ferrari’s Monaco headache became its Silverstone migraine

OPINION: Ferrari won the British Grand Prix with Carlos Sainz, but it ultimately cost Charles Leclerc a chance to make a bigger dent in Max Verstappen's title lead by leaving the Monegasque out on old tyres towards the end. Like Monaco, indecision over strategy proved to be the Scuderia's biggest issue - and if the team doesn't reflect, the headache can only intensify

The five factors behind Sainz winning a British GP he’d twice lost Plus

The five factors behind Sainz winning a British GP he’d twice lost

Formula 1 has a newest race winner, in a grand prix the victor appeared to have lost twice, only to charge back to headline a sensational and dramatic British Grand Prix. From a massive start crash to a late sprint finish, here’s how five factors saw Carlos Sainz take his maiden grand prix win

Formula 1
Jul 4, 2022
Why there was no case to answer in Aston’s latest F1 copycat saga Plus

Why there was no case to answer in Aston’s latest F1 copycat saga

The appearance of a revised Aston Martin in Spain caused controversy but PAT SYMONDS explains why the FIA investigation found the Silverstone team had no case to answer

Formula 1
Jul 3, 2022
Why it's Red Bull that really leads a three-way fight so far at Silverstone Plus

Why it's Red Bull that really leads a three-way fight so far at Silverstone

After a slow start to Friday at Silverstone, all the Formula 1 teams had to effectively cram in a day’s worth of practice into one hour. But there was still plenty to learn and while Ferrari topped the times, a three-way battle is brewing ahead of the British Grand Prix

Formula 1
Jul 2, 2022
Why the future is bright for the British GP Plus

Why the future is bright for the British GP

It wasn’t so long ago the situation looked bleak at Silverstone with the future of the British Grand Prix under threat. But a transformation has seen it restored to one of the most important races on the Formula 1 calendar, with bigger and better to come

Formula 1
Jul 1, 2022
Could mixed fortunes for F1's leading Brits turn around at Silverstone? Plus

Could mixed fortunes for F1's leading Brits turn around at Silverstone?

For the first time in many years, none of the local racers starts among the favourites for the British Grand Prix. But George Russell, Lewis Hamilton and Lando Norris could have reasons for optimism

Formula 1
Jun 30, 2022
Verstappen exclusive: Why F1’s champion isn’t fazed by Silverstone return Plus

Verstappen exclusive: Why F1’s champion isn’t fazed by Silverstone return

Max Verstappen is the world’s number one racing driver… and he’s determined to keep it that way. Speaking exclusively to GP Racing's OLEG KARPOV, the Red Bull driver explains why he’s relishing the 2022 championship battle with Charles Leclerc – and why he’s not worried about returning to Silverstone, the scene of the biggest accident of his career last year

Formula 1
Jun 30, 2022
Why Red Bull’s RB17 hypercar can help its F1 team Plus

Why Red Bull’s RB17 hypercar can help its F1 team

On Tuesday, Red Bull laid out its plans to develop and build a new hypercar - the RB17 - penned by Adrian Newey. As the project itself sates Newey as a creative outlet, it also offers Red Bull's Formula 1 team a number of new and exciting avenues to pursue

Formula 1
Jun 29, 2022