Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Will Mercedes or McLaren land the next punch at F1's Canadian GP?

Formula 1
Canadian GP
Will Mercedes or McLaren land the next punch at F1's Canadian GP?

The mental challenge Evans takes on at Rally Japan

WRC
Rally Japan
The mental challenge Evans takes on at Rally Japan

Why the Catalan GP chaos may finally force MotoGP riders to unite

Feature
MotoGP
Catalan GP
Why the Catalan GP chaos may finally force MotoGP riders to unite

Why Ford 'loves the V8 idea' in F1 amid changing road car strategy

Formula 1
Why Ford 'loves the V8 idea' in F1 amid changing road car strategy

What we learned from MotoGP's wretched Catalan GP

Feature
MotoGP
What we learned from MotoGP's wretched Catalan GP

How Verstappen's Nurburgring adventure marked the next phase of his legacy

Feature
GT
How Verstappen's Nurburgring adventure marked the next phase of his legacy

Why Nurburgring 24 Hours agony may motivate Verstappen to return

Endurance
Why Nurburgring 24 Hours agony may motivate Verstappen to return

Final Catalan GP results as five riders penalised and Mir loses MotoGP podium

MotoGP
Catalan GP
Final Catalan GP results as five riders penalised and Mir loses MotoGP podium
Pole man Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing, in Parc Ferme after Qualifying
Feature
Opinion

Why F1’s pole records could be about to become meaningless

Silverstone will be the first trial of Formula 1's new sprint race format on Saturday, which sets the grid for Sunday's British Grand Prix. But one key decision means the history books will be unnecessarily warped for this and other repeat experiments

Many of Formula 1’s recent ideas and experiments are to be welcomed. The qualifying sprint race, which will be first tried at the 2021 British Grand Prix, is a worthy attempt to spice-up the weekend. But one decision is baffling.

F1 boss Ross Brawn recently revealed that the winner of the sprint race will be officially credited with pole position in the history books.

Qualifying – or practice as it was previously known – has long been the ultimate test of raw speed for car and driver. Low-fuel, all-out attack with no (or few) tyre concerns is when we get to see F1’s sheer performance at its best.

F1 pole means something, and we all know what that something is. A look at the top 10 polesitters in F1 history, either in raw numbers or strike rate, isn’t a bad place to start when talking about the fastest drivers. It’s part of the ammunition in those sorts of debates that are impossible to definitively resolve, but fun to have.

Top 10 F1 polesitters 

Pos Driver Pole tally
1 Lewis Hamilton 100
2 Michael Schumacher  68
3 Ayrton Senna 65
4 Sebastian Vettel 57
5 Jim Clark  33
6 Alain Prost  33
7 Nigel Mansell  32
8 Nico Rosberg  30
9 Juan Manuel Fangio  29
10 Mika Hakkinen  26

Top 10 F1 polesitters by strike rate 

Pos Driver Strike Rate
1 Juan Manuel Fangio 56.9%
2 Jim Clark 45.2%
3 Alberto Ascari 43.8%
4 Ayrton Senna 40.1%
5 Lewis Hamilton 36.4%
6 Stirling Moss 23.9%
7 Michael Schumacher 22.4%
8 Sebastian Vettel 21.4%
9 Jackie Stewart 17.2%
10 Nigel Mansell 16.8%

No statistic is perfect, of course, and it can only provide part of a picture. Aside from the obvious point about the competitiveness of a driver’s machinery, some qualifying formats have been less ‘pure’ than others.

Chiefly, the rule requiring cars to qualify on race fuel during the 2000s skewed the statistic because sometimes the true fastest car/driver combination was kept off pole due to others running lighter fuel loads.

Jenson Button claimed pole for the 2006 Australian GP with a light fuel load in his Honda

Jenson Button claimed pole for the 2006 Australian GP with a light fuel load in his Honda

Photo by: Motorsport Images

Other anomalies can crop up in the official figures. For example, Michael Schumacher’s tally of 68 does not include his remarkable 2012 Monaco lap. He only lost pole due to a penalty from the preceding Spanish GP – not a technical infringement – so you could make a case for including it when assessing the German’s qualifying performances.

The importance of grid position has also changed over time, becoming more significant as downforce increased and overtaking became more difficult, but across the 1000+ world championship races the pole stat is still one of the most meaningful.

The muddying of the pole position statistics is so unnecessary. There will still be a traditional Friday qualifying, which will set the pole for Saturday’s sprint, so why not just make that count as the official pole?

Career points became almost irrelevant when the points for victory were changed from 10 to 25 in 2010, while the already fraught fastest lap stat has been undermined further by the point awarded for it since 2019.

PLUS: Why F1 must get rid of the point for fastest lap 

Wins and poles (and their relative strike rates), though imperfect, are the two most important and meaningful F1 records. And they provide more finesse (and more drivers) than a simple tally of world titles since 1950.

Winning the sprint race will require skills, of course, but it’s not the same thing as being the sheer fastest over one lap, which is what pole should be awarded for.

PLUS: How Hamilton's qualifying record compares to F1's past greats

You could say, ‘So what? It’s only going to upset a few stats geeks.’ But the muddying of the pole position statistics is so unnecessary. There will still be a traditional Friday qualifying, which will set the pole for Saturday’s sprint, so why not just make that count as the official pole?

“After discussions with the FIA, they feel pole position is the guy in front of the grid for the grand prix,” said Brawn.

Mika Hakkinen celebrates pole for the 1999 British GP

Mika Hakkinen celebrates pole for the 1999 British GP

Photo by: Motorsport Images

That could ‘help’ on two levels – it is easier to understand (the polesitter is the person who started at the front, not necessarily the case if the Friday times are used) and it ties into the FIA’s desire not to allow the sprint race to detract from the GP, classifying it firmly in the ‘qualifying’ part of the weekend.

But it really makes no difference, other than to undermine one of the most traditional GP elements – practice times first set the grid for the 1933 Monaco GP – and history is something F1 has previously agreed is important.

Top 10: The greatest Monaco Grands Prix

If the qualifying sprint race idea doesn’t work, this anomaly will be contained to the three 2021 races. But if it does work as hoped and there are more included in future F1 calendars, then the impact will get bigger and bigger.

There are lots of things to like about F1 at the moment. The championship fight, a willingness to experiment and new rules for 2022 to look forward to. But the point for fastest lap and the undermining of what pole position means are unnecessary collateral damage and need to go.

Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing RB16B, and Lando Norris, McLaren MCL35M, prepare to lead the field away at the start

Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing RB16B, and Lando Norris, McLaren MCL35M, prepare to lead the field away at the start

Photo by: Mark Sutton / Motorsport Images

Previous article FIA will treat F1 sprint race same as normal GP
Next article Russell: Hamilton gets better with age ‘like a fine wine’

Top Comments

More from Kevin Turner

Latest news