Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Indecent proposal? How Sainz's big idea to change F1 qualifying might work

Feature
Formula 1
British GP
Indecent proposal? How Sainz's big idea to change F1 qualifying might work

Why Ferrari fears "deficit could be twice as big" to Mercedes at Silverstone and Spa

Formula 1
British GP
Why Ferrari fears "deficit could be twice as big" to Mercedes at Silverstone and Spa

How "charging station" Silverstone will really look different in F1 2026

Formula 1
British GP
How "charging station" Silverstone will really look different in F1 2026

Alonso denies claim that Aston Martin's Hungarian GP upgrade will decide his F1 future

Formula 1
British GP
Alonso denies claim that Aston Martin's Hungarian GP upgrade will decide his F1 future

Dixon to leave Chip Ganassi Racing at end of 2026 IndyCar season

IndyCar
Mid-Ohio
Dixon to leave Chip Ganassi Racing at end of 2026 IndyCar season

Kay back to the top of Autosport National Rankings table

National
Kay back to the top of Autosport National Rankings table

Alonso: Silverstone will be "not fun to drive" with 2026 F1 cars

Formula 1
British GP
Alonso: Silverstone will be "not fun to drive" with 2026 F1 cars

Motorsport UK and BRDC unite to develop young British drivers

National
Motorsport UK and BRDC unite to develop young British drivers

Stoddart Wanted One Engine Rule by 2003

Minardi boss Paul Stoddart has hit out at Formula One rule makers, the FIA, for their decision not to bring cost-cutting changes into the sport until 2004.

Minardi boss Paul Stoddart has hit out at Formula One rule makers, the FIA, for their decision not to bring cost-cutting changes into the sport until 2004.

Australian Stoddart claims the new rule of one engine per car for each race should have been introduced next year to prevent more cash-strapped teams from struggling. And although he joined Jordan boss Eddie Jordan in saying the moves were "a good start", he added: "It should have happened for 2003, not 2004.

"The engine manufacturers needed more time, but if you tell them in March they need to change for the following March I don't see the problem. It is better than nothing and overall it will make things more exciting so it is good for Formula One - but I think the proposal in its original form was better for the sport."

Stoddart revealed that, despite calls from himself and Jordan, there was not even a vote on whether to introduce the rule next year. He also added that calls for just two engines per car at each 2003 Grand Prix weekend were ignored and admitted that changing to a two-day weekend was "never a starter".

Stoddart believes the latest rule change is only part of the major re-structuring required to ensure Formula One survives, and he has called for team bosses to get together to work on other proposals for the future.

"At the moment we have to digest the reaction to this set of rules," said Stoddart. "A lot of teams don't pay for the engines so there are a lot of other costs that need to be addressed. We as team owners will discuss that. Testing is for a team discussion but we need to look at all the costs in Formula One.

"All the teams are talking to each other. I think we are all responsible enough to understand that if we don't control costs then the costs will control us. If we are all sensible and look at it as a united voice then we will avoid more problems. There is a united concern and that has to be worked on. It is up to us to convert it to a united voice on cutting costs."

Previous article Ove Andersson Q&A
Next article Barcelona, day 3: New Ferrari fastest

Top Comments