Q & A with Ron Dennis

As Formula One prepares for the world title showdown between Lewis Hamilton and Felipe Massa, Ron Dennis faces another tortuous, nail-biting afternoon, waiting to see if all McLaren's hard work will come to fruition in 2008

Q & A with Ron Dennis

Speaking to the press after qualifying for the season finale in Brazil yesterday, the McLaren boss explained why despite the pressure of a title fight his team were calm and ready for battle, and why he knows, whatever the outcome, that they have done their level best to deal with any eventuality. Autosport.com was there to hear what he had to say.

Q. Given what happened to Lewis two days ago, do you think it's right to continue to put your drivers up for these sorts of promotional events?

Ron Dennis: Why don't you ask a controversial question? The reality is that we have obligations that we have with our sponsors and obviously some of these present opportunities for people who are being properly credentialed to get involved in our press conferences. That was a press conference that by its very nature related to the dedicated driver programme that we have in this country and eight other countries throughout the world.

We are monitoring how effective that is because we can see how many lives we saved. That was a conference which lasted an hour, this was two practical jokers and we just have to be dismissive of it. You know, Lewis was initially a little upset because he didn't understand what it was all about and you don't expect to have two practical jokers in a media event. You just relax and don't let it get to you and realise that these things happen in this world and just look at those people and feel sorry for them if that's how they are going to try and get something.

Q. Almost all of the time that Lewis is giving away to Massa is in the middle sector on that Q3 run. It's almost four tenths in the middle sector?

RD: The guys at the front are on three-stop strategies - simple as that. It's just fuel load. You don't have the level of competitiveness that we had in practice and Q1 and Q2 and then suddenly lose it.

We know how much fuel we put in the car, we know what the expected laptime is for that fuel load and we were close to that time. It's purely a different strategy. The problem with a three stop strategy is that the whole thing is refelctive of what they have to do an d what we have to do. The three-stop strategy gives you tremendous vulnerability to two things - rain and safety car. And our objective is to come in the first five. We knew that we wanted to eliminate those things.

Obviously Toyota isn't a threat. Massa, we don't have to beat him, we can finish behind him, so we have to avoid first-lap incident and run a disciplined race and I think our strategy will become very apparent to everybody and that's our target. To go that light really puts you at a huge risk if it rains.

Q. So following on, the other question mark that raises is do you feel it's safer to have your driver who has a lot to lose starting in a pack with other cars around him, one of which is Fernando Alonso who passed him from the same place last year rather than having him off the front?

RD: Off the front, with a safety car or weather, could cost us the world championship because from tenth back you've got everybody fuelled long. All of those guys are going to be ahead of anyone who has to stop in the early part of the race and that's going to be a challenge, to get past them. You don't need much - trying to get past people even on a circuit where you have the ability to overtake is fraught with risk. So it's a complete risk assessment.

We've run every single analysis not just for two weeks, for longer, of what is the right thing to do. Whatever the outcome, the decision we took was absolutely the right decision, we don't regret one moment of it.

Q. How do you feel on the eve of this race compared to last year?

RD: Well, you know I feel a little hungry, so I'm going to a Churrascaria! I'm completely relaxed, the team has done a great job through the whole season. There are lots of great moments of frustration - Spa was very frustrating, the penalty we had in Fuji was very frustrating. There's things that obviously didn't go as we wanted them to but in the end we have done an exceptionally good job here. We were a little bit confused by the performance later but it was very apparent there were a lot of light cars yesterday. There's not much that we haven't provided for.

Q. How do you get around Fernando Alonso's enduring bitterness. He says he would rather any team other than McLaren won the championship?

RD: First of all I wasn't there. If you are accurately quoting Fernando and he said he'd rather have anyone other than McLaren then it would be very easy and it's very tempting to go back and talk about some of the weaknesses in his character, in his approach to grand prix racing. But I'm not going to do it. I hope that, not just him, all the grand prix drivers should realise that to come down to the last grand prix to determine the world champion is a good thing and that both of these guys should be given every opportunity to try to beat each other. I hope that all drivers are clean and appreciate that their role is to allow these guys to fight fairly and not interfere with the world champions and that applies to everybody including Heikki and Kimi. That's my wish and I hope whoever is world champion isn't soured by the behaviour of any other driver.

Q. Lewis comes here seven points ahead of a Ferrari. How much better is Lewis now than a year ago?

RD: It's just maturity. The statistics prove everything. He was more world championship points accumulated since the beginning of last year than any other driver. But he understands now that you don't just drive the car at all times to win the race and that's one of the many things that he has learned over the last year. He's maturerer, a better race driver, more tactical. But it's no more than you would expect having had the experience of last year.

Q. Did you say it has taken two weeks of background analysis or did you decide two weeks ago?

RD: No, we used all the time to run every single possible scenario that we could think of. And also introduced all the problems that we imagined could occur and factored those in. Can we damage a nose? Can we stop? Can we change a nose and still come fifth? All those things we factored into every scenario we could think of.

We increased the intensity of the real-time analysis so we should be able to pick up any variation or tyre pressure within two or three seconds so that if he does pick up a puncture and he's a few hundred yards from the pit-lane entrance that we can pick it up fast enough. Every single part on the car has been re-analysed. We looked at the history over the last year of each components reliability, anything that falls close to being of concern.

These things have been selected out of known batches, eliminate what we call infant mortality by running a number of tests over a period of time. It's a phenomenally detailed and focused effort to get the most reliability we can. I can say whatever the outcome, if our car fails - and we don't want that to happen - that no more effort could have been put in than we put in.

You can only do your best and if that isn't good enough you've got to be able to look back and say is there any more we could done? And I can categorically say now that we couldn't have done more. The 0.15 of a second that we improved the car from the last grand prix to here is the most expensive tenth that we have ever, ever produced. We threw everything at this race, to get that squeezed out after the intensity of our development programme has been a huge amount of effort.

We can't have made it faster, put more effort into making it reliable and we can't have put more effort into trying to accommodate anything that could happen in the race tomorrow. If we fail, you will obviously be very critical especially as I've set myself up, but the one thing we won't be doing is going away from here saying we screwed up because we could have put more effort into it.

Q. Can you quantify the aggregate performance gain over the season?

RD: We hit our target and our target was two and a half seconds from the first race to this one. Theoretically we should able to go back to Australia and go two-and-a-half seconds quicker. By and large, every circuit we have been to we have been quickest and we have made significant steps throughout the season.

shares
comments
Dennis: We could not be more prepared

Previous article

Dennis: We could not be more prepared

Next article

Kubica baffled by qualifying slump

Kubica baffled by qualifying slump
Load comments
Why McLaren's expanding agenda will benefit its F1 resurgence Plus

Why McLaren's expanding agenda will benefit its F1 resurgence

In the 1960s and 1970s, McLaren juggled works entries in F1, sportscars and the Indy 500 while building cars for F3 and F2. Now it’s returning to its roots, expanding 
into IndyCars and Extreme E while continuing its F1 renaissance. There’s talk of Formula E and WEC entries too. But is this all too much, too soon? STUART CODLING talks to the man in charge

How Tsunoda plans to achieve his F1 potential Plus

How Tsunoda plans to achieve his F1 potential

Yuki Tsunoda arrived in grand prix racing amid a whirlwind of hype, which only increased after his first race impressed the biggest wigs in Formula 1. His road since has been rocky and crash-filled, and OLEG KARPOV asks why Red Bull maintains faith in a driver who admits he isn’t really that big a fan of F1?

Formula 1
Oct 15, 2021
The danger of reading too much into F1's clickbait radio messages Plus

The danger of reading too much into F1's clickbait radio messages

OPINION: After Lewis Hamilton responded to reports labelling him 'furious' with Mercedes following his heated exchanges over team radio during the Russian Grand Prix, it provided a snapshot on how Formula 1 broadcasting radio snippets can both illuminate and misrepresent the true situation

Formula 1
Oct 14, 2021
Why F1’s approach to pole winners with grid penalties undermines drivers Plus

Why F1’s approach to pole winners with grid penalties undermines drivers

OPINION: Valtteri Bottas is credited with pole position for the 2021 Turkish Grand Prix, despite being beaten in qualifying. This is another example of Formula 1 and the FIA scoring an own goal by forgetting what makes motorsport magic, with the Istanbul race winner also a victim of this in the championship’s recent history

Formula 1
Oct 13, 2021
Turkish Grand Prix Driver Ratings Plus

Turkish Grand Prix Driver Ratings

On a day that the number two Mercedes enjoyed a rare day in the sun, the Turkish Grand Prix produced several standout drives - not least from a driver who has hit a purple patch of late

Formula 1
Oct 11, 2021
The hidden factors that thwarted Hamilton's bid for shock Turkish GP glory Plus

The hidden factors that thwarted Hamilton's bid for shock Turkish GP glory

Starting 11th after his engine change grid penalty, Lewis Hamilton faced a tough task to repeat his Turkish Grand Prix heroics of 2020 - despite making strong early progress in the wet. Instead, his Mercedes team-mate Valtteri Bottas broke through for a first win of the year to mitigate Max Verstappen re-taking the points lead

Formula 1
Oct 11, 2021
How pitstops evolved into an F1 art form Plus

How pitstops evolved into an F1 art form

A Formula 1 pitstop is a rapid-fire blend of high technology and human performance. PAT SYMONDS describes how the science of margin gains makes stops so quick

Formula 1
Oct 10, 2021
Why Mercedes' Istanbul edge is both stronger and weaker than it seems Plus

Why Mercedes' Istanbul edge is both stronger and weaker than it seems

Mercedes and Lewis Hamilton dominated the opening day of action for the 2021 Turkish Grand Prix, on the Istanbul circuit’s much improved track surface. But the Black Arrows squad’s position isn’t quite what it seems. Here’s why

Formula 1
Oct 8, 2021