Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Why Russell doesn’t want to see the 2026 F1 rules changed

Formula 1
Canadian GP
Why Russell doesn’t want to see the 2026 F1 rules changed

How Rosenqvist came of age in the closest Indy 500 finish in history

Feature
IndyCar
110th Running of the Indianapolis 500
How Rosenqvist came of age in the closest Indy 500 finish in history

Why "awesome" Canadian GP has convinced Hamilton he's "probably better without" Ferrari simulator

Formula 1
Canadian GP
Why "awesome" Canadian GP has convinced Hamilton he's "probably better without" Ferrari simulator

Canadian Grand Prix Driver Ratings 2026

Formula 1
Canadian GP
Canadian Grand Prix Driver Ratings 2026

How Ferrari and Audi could decide Verstappen's F1 future

Feature
Formula 1
Canadian GP
How Ferrari and Audi could decide Verstappen's F1 future

Antonelli takes a decisive step in Montreal's all-action thriller

Feature
Formula 1
Canadian GP
Antonelli takes a decisive step in Montreal's all-action thriller

Russell "lost for words" after heartbreaking Canadian GP exit

Formula 1
Canadian GP
Russell "lost for words" after heartbreaking Canadian GP exit

F1 Canadian GP: Antonelli lands F1 2026 blow as Russell retires in Montreal

Formula 1
Canadian GP
F1 Canadian GP: Antonelli lands F1 2026 blow as Russell retires in Montreal

Losing Force India F1 bidder Uralkali says it is taking legal action

Russian company Uralkali says it is suing the administrators responsible for finding a new owner for the Force India Formula 1 team

Uralkali, which is linked to GP3 race winner Nikita Mazepin's father Dmitry, attempted to buy the team after Force India fell into administration in the summer.

However, it lost out to a consortium led by Lawrence Stroll, father of Williams F1 driver Lance, and raised concerns about the administration process.

Now, Uralkali says it has launched legal action in London's High Court.

In a statement given to Autosport, Uralkali cites "inadequate responses" from the administrators, Geoff Rowley and Jason Baker of FRP Advisory LLP, over why its bid was unsuccessful.

It claims that the administrator has confirmed that the winning bid was "significantly inferior" to its own and Uralkali believes "the highest bid should have been determined as the winner".

Uralkali states that the administration process contained "misrepresentations and lack of transparency" and "failed to achieve the maximisation of sale proceeds for the benefit of creditors, shareholders and other stakeholders".

It says it made what it calls "an extremely generous offer to acquire the company's business, assets and goodwill", tabling a cash consideration of between £101.5million and £122million.

This would have satisfied creditors, which included engine supplier Mercedes, in full and paid the administrators' costs, as well as backing a five-year development programme, according to Uralkali.

It also claims more than £40m would have been left after those payments to distribute to the sole shareholder of Force India, Orange India Holdings Sarl.

This would have been held subject to the terms of the freezing order issued by UK's High Court in favour of 13 Indian banks.

The administrators entered an exclusivity agreement with the consortium led by Stroll, which eventually bought the assets and re-entered the team as Racing Point Force India.

Uralkali, a global producer of potash fertilizer, says its business rationale for trying to buy Force India was to market the company, as it services 20 of the 21 host countries in F1.

Paul James Ostling, senior independent director and a member of Uralkali's board for seven years, led its bid for Force India.

He said: "Because of these concerns and the costs of our bid, as well as potential large business revenue losses, Uralkali has no option but to launch these proceedings and seek substantial damages."

However, a statement from the joint administrators, given to Autosport, noted Uralkali's release but said it was not aware the claim had been made and defended its own actions.

"No such claim has been received by us or, as far as we are aware, by the Court," the statement read.

"If a claim is issued it will be defended vigorously.

"We have fulfilled our statutory duties as administrators throughout this process and ultimately achieved a very successful outcome for all stakeholders.

"Any legal action brought against us will be defended vigorously, and we are confident it would be dismissed."

Previous article F1 triple-header only considered for flyaway races, not Europe
Next article Idea of Renault beating F1's top three teams in 2019 is 'ludicrous'

Top Comments

Latest news