Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

The new strengths Antonelli has shown in F1, 12 months on from 'reaching the bottom'

Formula 1
Belgian GP
The new strengths Antonelli has shown in F1, 12 months on from 'reaching the bottom'

How Estonia crowned Pajari as the WRC’s new flying Finn

Feature
WRC
Rally Estonia
How Estonia crowned Pajari as the WRC’s new flying Finn

What we can learn from Mercedes' floor after Russell's Belgian GP retirement

Formula 1
Belgian GP
What we can learn from Mercedes' floor after Russell's Belgian GP retirement

The important lesson Solberg put into practice in Estonia

WRC
Rally Estonia
The important lesson Solberg put into practice in Estonia

Wolff admits Mercedes has most powerful F1 engine – and Red Bull agrees – as ADUO returns to spotlight

Formula 1
Belgian GP
Wolff admits Mercedes has most powerful F1 engine – and Red Bull agrees – as ADUO returns to spotlight

Citroen Formula E team boss Cyril Blais dies aged 43

Formula E
Citroen Formula E team boss Cyril Blais dies aged 43

Belgian Grand Prix Driver Ratings 2026

Formula 1
Belgian GP
Belgian Grand Prix Driver Ratings 2026

Welcome to the jungle? When Formula 1.5 came to Spa

Feature
Formula 1
Belgian GP
Welcome to the jungle? When Formula 1.5 came to Spa

GPDA's F1 intervention long-planned and not a knee-jerk - Wurz

Grand prix drivers were considering speaking out against the way Formula 1 is governed for "quite a while" according to GPDA chairman Alex Wurz

Ex-F1 racer Wurz, together with world champions Sebastian Vettel and Jenson Button, released a statement on behalf of the current grid on Wednesday, saying "disruptive" changes being made by F1's decision-makers "could jeopardise its future success".

While Wurz accepted the statement came as a result of hot debate over F1's direction, he dismissed suggestions the drivers had simply reacted to a controversial Australian Grand Prix weekend that featured the debut of an unpopular new qualifying format.

IN QUOTES: How F1 paddock reacted to new qualifying

"Drivers are the real stars and protagonists of our sport and in response to some heated discussions by our fans and also inside the paddock, the drivers felt it is time to express their collective opinion," Wurz said.

"This was not a knee-jerk reaction to the qualifying experiment.

"This statement was well-considered and planned between all drivers for quite a while now and discussed in Melbourne again during the special drivers' briefing the GPDA held.

"Since the GPDA's existence in the 1960s we operate by majority vote, which works very well.

"In this case, it was an extremely clear vote regarding the desire to express our opinion."

Wurz said the drivers believe F1 will not be able to achieve the changes they are calling for by continuing to make minor adjustments on and off-track.

"It is the majority opinion of the drivers, in order to make our sport fit for the future and next generations, the business model and the way F1 is run needs to be addressed and redefined, and followed by a clear road map or masterplan," he said.

"We are not convinced that individual updates to sporting or technical rules are the solution.

"We believe every acting individual of the stakeholders wants the best for the sport.

"However, the process of how the stakeholders decide over the sport doesn't seem to work too well right now when one observes it from the outside."

Previous article Drivers call for restructure of Formula 1 governance
Next article Why F1 drivers have had enough with grand prix racing's direction

Top Comments