Drivers call for restructure of Formula 1 governance
Leading Formula 1 drivers have called for change to the way F1 is governed, calling the current structure "obsolete"
F1 has come under fire recently after hastily introducing unpopular changes to its qualifying format on the eve of the season.
This came shortly after commercial chief Bernie Ecclestone called the current version of F1 "the worst it's ever been".
World champion Lewis Hamilton criticised the way F1 is run following his second place finish in the Australian Grand Prix and now the Grand Prix Drivers Association has described the decision-making process "obsolete and ill-structured".
In a letter signed by Jenson Button, Sebastian Vettel and GPDA president Alex Wurz, released through the body's Twitter account, the GPDA - which represents drivers - has asked for F1's governance structure to change.
"Formula 1 is currently challenged by a difficult global economic environment, a swift change in fan and consumer behaviour, and a decisive shift in the TV and media landscape," the statement read.
"This makes it fundamental that the sport's leaders make smart and well-considered adjustments.
"We feel that some recent rule changes - on both the sporting and technical side, and including some business decisions - are disruptive, do not address the bigger issues our sport is facing and in some cases could jeopardise its future success.
"We know that among the leaders of the sport - be it the owners, their representatives, the governing body, the teams or other stakeholders - every individual acts with the very best intentions.
"Therefore, the drivers have come to the conclusion that the decision-making process in the sport is obsolete and ill-structured and prevents progress being made.
"Indeed, it can sometimes lead to just the opposite, a gridlock.
"This reflects negatively on our sport, prevents it being fit for the next generation of fans and compromises future global growth.
"We would like to request and urge the owners and all stakeholders of Formula 1 to consider restructuring its own governance."
NOT A 'BLIND AND DISRESPECTFUL ATTACK'
The GPDA says drivers are "probably the people with the purest interest for Formula 1, beside our fans" and urges F1's bosses to view its statement as being "in the best interests of all" not "a blind and disrespectful attack".
"The future directions and decisions of F1, be they short or long-term, sporting, technical or business orientated, should be based on a clear masterplan," the statement said.
"We need to ensure that F1 remains a sport, a closely-fought competition between the best drivers in extraordinary machines on the coolest race tracks.
"F1 should be home only to be best teams, drivers and circuits, with partners and suppliers fit for such an elite championship.
"Formula 1 has undoubtedly established itself as the pinnacle of motorsport and as such one of the most viewed and popular sports around the world.
"We drivers stand united, offer our help and support for F1 to keep it as such, and further to make it fit and exciting for many years and generations to come."
Previous article
Williams feels it's now behind Toro Rosso in Formula 1 order
Next article
GPDA's F1 intervention long-planned and not a knee-jerk - Wurz
The times that suggest Verstappen should be confident of F1 Russian GP recovery
For the second race in a row, Mercedes has ended the first day of track action on top. It’s in a commanding position at the Russian Grand Prix once again – this time largely thanks to Max Verstappen’s upcoming engine-change grid penalty. But there’s plenty to suggest all hope is not lost for the championship leader at Sochi
The ‘backwards step’ that is the right move for Formula 1
OPINION: With its days apparently numbered, the MGU-H looks set to be dropped from Formula 1’s future engine rules in order to entice new manufacturers in. While it may appear a change of direction, the benefits for teams and fans could make the decision a worthwhile call
The floundering fortunes of F1’s many Lotus reboots
Team Lotus ceased to exist in 1994 - and yet various parties have been trying to resurrect the hallowed name, in increasingly unrecognisable forms, ever since. DAMIEN SMITH brings GP Racing’s history of the legendary team to an end with a look at those who sought to keep the flame alive in Formula 1
Why the 2021 title fight is far from F1's worst, despite its toxic background
OPINION: Formula 1 reconvenes for the Russian Grand Prix two weeks after the latest blow in ‘Max Verstappen vs Lewis Hamilton’. While the Silverstone and Monza incidents were controversial, they thankfully lacked one element that so far separates the 2021 title fight from the worst examples of ugly championship battles
How F1’s other champion to emerge from 1991 thrived at Lotus
Mika Hakkinen became Michael Schumacher’s biggest rival in Formula 1 in the late-90s and early 2000s, having also made his F1 debut in 1991. But as MARK GALLAGHER recalls, while Schumacher wowed the world with a car that was eminently capable, Hakkinen was fighting to make his mark with a famous team in terminal decline
The forgotten F1 comeback that began Jordan’s odyssey
Before Michael Schumacher – or anyone else – had driven the 191 (or 911 as it was initially called), Eddie Jordan turned to a fellow Irishman to test his new Formula 1 car. JOHN WATSON, a grand prix winner for Penske and McLaren, recalls his role in the birth of a legend…
The squandered potential of a 70s F1 underdog
A podium finisher in its first outing but then never again, the BRM P201 was a classic case of an opportunity squandered by disorganisation and complacency, says STUART CODLING
The other notable Monza escape that F1 should learn from
OPINION: The headlines were dominated by the Italian Grand Prix crash between Max Verstappen and Lewis Hamilton, who had the halo to thank for avoiding potentially serious injury. But two days earlier, Formula 1 had a lucky escape with a Monza pitlane incident that could also have had grave consequences
