Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Trackhouse Aprilia set to finalise Raul Fernandez 2027 MotoGP deal

MotoGP
Czech GP
Trackhouse Aprilia set to finalise Raul Fernandez 2027 MotoGP deal

Acosta points out the major flaw in MotoGP's plan to ban front holeshot device mid-season

MotoGP
Czech GP
Acosta points out the major flaw in MotoGP's plan to ban front holeshot device mid-season

The bold Ferrari turnaround that enabled Hamilton's Barcelona win

Feature
Formula 1
Barcelona-Catalunya GP
The bold Ferrari turnaround that enabled Hamilton's Barcelona win

Vital step made towards USA's WRC return

WRC
Vital step made towards USA's WRC return

How British GT is on for an enthralling 2026 title fight

Feature
British GT
How British GT is on for an enthralling 2026 title fight

Mercedes reveals conclusions after costly DNFs in recent F1 races

Formula 1
Barcelona-Catalunya GP
Mercedes reveals conclusions after costly DNFs in recent F1 races

Ferrari to introduce new F1 fuel and engine updates in Austria

Formula 1
Austrian GP
Ferrari to introduce new F1 fuel and engine updates in Austria

MotoGP’s own ‘Concorde Agreement’ is finally official

MotoGP
Czech GP
MotoGP’s own ‘Concorde Agreement’ is finally official

Four teams supported Renault case

Renault received letters of support from four of its rival teams in its bid to overturn its European Grand Prix race ban at this week's FIA International Court of Appeal hearing, it has been revealed

On Wednesday, the FIA published the reasons behind the Court's decision to drop Renault's suspension from the Valencia event and replace it with a $50,000 (USD) fine for the unsafe release of Fernando Alonso after a pit-stop at the Hungarian GP.

In the reasons it was clearly explained that the ban was dropped because there was no proof that Renault deliberately let Alonso out of the pits without his front right wheel safely attached.

The findings stated: "The Court endorses the FIA's view that it is always necessary to have regard to the potential dangers which arise from a situation, as recent tragic incidents have proved.

"However, in assessing the penalty which is appropriate in an individual case, great care must be taken not to equate potential danger with conscious wrong-doing."

It was also revealed that Renault's case was helped by the fact that Red Bull Racing, McLaren, Ferrari and Toyota all wrote letters supporting Renault's case - with two teams admitting that their own pit-stop procedures have had to be changed to avoid a repeat of an Alonso-type situation.

The court stated: "The Court notes that it has taken account of the letters of support which the Appellant has received from Red Bull Racing, Vodafone McLaren Mercedes, Scuderia Ferrari Marlboro, and Toyota F1 Team and which it has submitted to the Court.

"These letters confirm that two of the above-mentioned teams lay claim to having followed improved procedures precisely in order to avoid the very serious safety risks which unquestionable arose in the present case.

"While the Court accepts the FIA's submissions that the letters should not be regarded as wholly unsolicited testimonials of support, it considers that it would be wrong in the circumstances of this case to ignore the other teams' views, which they have formally recorded in writing with the knowledge and intention that they should be submitted to the Court."

Previous article Europe preview quotes: Brawn
Next article Button not nervous over Brawn form

Top Comments

Latest news