Force India accuses Haas of 'hypocrisy' for F1 protest

Force India Formula 1 boss Otmar Szafnauer has questioned Haas's protest against his team, and says Force India has more right to call itself a constructor than Haas

Force India accuses Haas of 'hypocrisy' for F1 protest

In its protest the US-owned outfit claimed that current entrant Racing Point Force India is using a car designed and manufactured by its predecessor, Sahara Force India, with specific reference to listed parts - those the FIA specifies cannot be shared between teams, in essence the chassis itself and the bodywork.

The FIA stewards dismissed the protest and confirmed the new Force India entry first accepted for the Belgian GP was valid, and the new team met the definition of a constructor.

They asserted that the rules make it clear a team cannot use parts provided by a rival - and that because the original Force India team was out of the world championship and no longer a competitor, the use of the car created by the original team is legal.

Szafnauer questioned Haas boss's Gunther Steiner's claim that the protest was part of a quest for equality after the new Force India team was guaranteed the commercial rights earned by the original entry.

"I don't understand how they were claiming that they're trying to get equality by claiming that we're not a constructor when we clearly are," Szafnauer told Autosport.

"We design and make more parts than most teams, maybe a hundredfold more than Haas do.

"The irony and hypocrisy of it is they are protesting us, saying that we're not a constructor, when we are the definition of a constructor, and they aren't.

"The protest was that we are not a constructor because we didn't design and make the listed parts.

"Well, we did. Andy Green and Akio Haga and Ian Hall and Dan Carpenter, those are the guys that designed it, and guess what, they work for us!"

Szafnauer is adamant that when the new team was created prior to the Belgian GP it was allowed to take over the technology created by the original organisation.

"What the regulations say is that a designed part cannot be used by two competitors in the championship," he said. "And that's not the case with us.

"If you buy designs and IP from an entity that is not a participant in F1, that's allowed.

"What's not allowed is to buy from another participant that is in F1, unless the parts are non-listed.

"And Haas employ that as well. They don't design themselves, they don't make themselves, they buy from Dallara. That is allowed.

"And we've done exactly that with Sahara Force India, that isn't racing any more.

"Now, if we had 11 teams, if Sahara Force India and Racing Point Force India raced with identical cars, then they would have a case."

Szafnauer pointed out that when teams change owners and chassis names they inevitably use technology designed under the previous identity.

"When Renault bought Lotus I'm sure that the next year's car was not 100% new, they used some designs that were there from the Lotus days," he added.

"You don't redesign pedals or steering columns every year, so this kind of thing happens all the time. The only difference is this happened mid-season."

shares
comments
Haas protest of Force India's F1 entry dismissed in Abu Dhabi
Previous article

Haas protest of Force India's F1 entry dismissed in Abu Dhabi

Next article

Markelov set to drive Renault Formula 1 car in post-season test

Markelov set to drive Renault Formula 1 car in post-season test
Load comments
The downside to F1's show and tell proposal Plus

The downside to F1's show and tell proposal

Technology lies at the heart of the F1 story and it fascinates fans, which is why the commercial rights holder plans to compel teams to show more of their ‘secrets’. STUART CODLING fears this will encourage techno-quackery…

How getting sacked gave Mercedes F1’s tech wizard lasting benefits Plus

How getting sacked gave Mercedes F1’s tech wizard lasting benefits

He’s had a hand in world championship-winning Formula 1 cars for Benetton, Renault and Mercedes, and was also a cog in the Schumacher-Ferrari axis. Having recently ‘moved upstairs’ as Mercedes chief technical officer, James Allison tells STUART CODLING about his career path and why being axed by Benetton was one of the best things that ever happened to him

Formula 1
Nov 28, 2021
The remarkable qualities that propelled Kubica’s F1 comeback Plus

The remarkable qualities that propelled Kubica’s F1 comeback

It’s easy to look at
 Robert Kubica’s second Formula 1 career and feel a sense of sadness that he didn’t reach the heights for which he seemed destined. But as BEN ANDERSON discovered, performance and results are almost meaningless in this context – something more fundamental and incredible happened…

Formula 1
Nov 27, 2021
The humbling changes Ricciardo made to deliver the goods for McLaren  Plus

The humbling changes Ricciardo made to deliver the goods for McLaren 

From being lapped by his own team-mate in Monaco to winning at Monza, it’s been a tumultuous first season at McLaren for Daniel Ricciardo. But, as he tells STUART CODLING, there’s more to the story of his turnaround than having a lovely summer holiday during Formula 1's summer break...

Formula 1
Nov 26, 2021
The potential benefits of losing the F1 constructors' title Plus

The potential benefits of losing the F1 constructors' title

As the battle continues to rage over the F1 2021 drivers' championship, teams up and down the grid are turning their attentions to the prize money attributed to each position in the constructors' standings. But F1's sliding scale rules governing windtunnel and CFD use will soften the blow for those who miss out on the top places

Formula 1
Nov 25, 2021
The invisible enemy that’s made Hamilton’s title charge tougher Plus

The invisible enemy that’s made Hamilton’s title charge tougher

After winning his past few Formula 1 titles at a canter, Lewis Hamilton currently trails Max Verstappen by eight points heading into the final double-header of 2021. Although Red Bull has been his biggest on-track challenge, Hamilton feels that he has just as much to grapple with away from the circuit

Formula 1
Nov 24, 2021
Why F1’s inconvenient penalties have to stay Plus

Why F1’s inconvenient penalties have to stay

OPINION: Quibbles over the length of time taken by Formula 1's stewards over decisions are entirely valid. But however inconvenient it is, there can be no questioning the importance of having clearly defined rules that everyone understands and can stick to. Recent events have shown that ambiguity could have big consequences

Formula 1
Nov 23, 2021
The mistakes Red Bull cannot afford to repeat in F1 2021’s title fight climax Plus

The mistakes Red Bull cannot afford to repeat in F1 2021’s title fight climax

OPINION: Red Bull has had Formula 1’s fastest package for most of 2021, but in several of the title run-in events it has wasted the RB16B’s potential. It cannot afford to do so again with Lewis Hamilton motoring back towards Max Verstappen in the drivers’ standings with two rounds remaining

Formula 1
Nov 23, 2021