Haas protest of Force India's F1 entry dismissed in Abu Dhabi

The Abu Dhabi Grand Prix stewards have dismissed Haas's protest against the Racing Point Force India Formula 1 team ahead of the 2018 season finale

Haas protest of Force India's F1 entry dismissed in Abu Dhabi

Haas alleged that the new Force India entry, accepted by the FIA at the Belgian Grand Prix after the original entity fell into administration, is not a constructor because it used a design from a different company and team.

Haas asserted that Racing Point Force India was therefore ineligible to enter those cars in the championship.

After a long, disrupted hearing that ran across two days in Abu Dhabi, the stewards have dismissed the protest and ruled in favour of Force India in a lengthy verdict.

Haas was represented by team principal Gunther Steiner and team manager Peter Crolla plus a legal representative, with Force India's sporting director Andy Stevenson joined by a legal representive and general counsel.

FIA F1 race director Charlie Whiting joined the hearing, as did the FIA's head of governance, integrity and regulatory affairs Pierre Ketterer via teleconference.

They published nine decisions in response to the hearing, with the chief verdicts based on F1's rules over 'listed parts'.

These are parts that teams are asked to design themselves but they can outsource the design/manufacture provided those processes are not carried out by a competitor.

Haas had contested that Racing Point Force India had neither designed nor outsourced the parts.

The stewards ruled that the original Force India team could not be considered a "competitor or constructor" because it no longer exists and stated there is no regulatory support that listed parts cannot come from a former or excluded team.

Force India ceased to meet the FIA definition of both a competitor and a constructor on August 16, when its assets were sold to allow the formation of the new Racing Point Force India organisation.

The stewards thus determined that the procurement of the listed parts was allowed.

As they are satisfied Racing Point Force India meets the definition of a constructor and a competitor of the 2018 world championship, they have ruled that it is a valid entry.

Haas's protests were therefore dismissed, although the team has the right to appeal.

The stewards noted that Haas acted good faith as "significant material" only came to light recently.

Though the appeal was over a sporting matter, the row is a legacy of a dispute of whether the new Force India team should be eligible for prize money.

Haas does not believe the team should be allowed to immediately qualify for 'Column 1' payments, which teams need to finish in the top 10 in two of three seasons to be eligible for.

It argues that as Haas had to wait for those payments after it joined the grid in 2016 then the new Force India entry should do the same.

In their verdict over the protest, the stewards made it clear that Force India is a "new team" and a "separate and different legal entity", and therefore "cannot be considered the same team as the former Force India".

shares
comments
Carlos Sainz Jr's early McLaren F1 test an 'important head start'

Previous article

Carlos Sainz Jr's early McLaren F1 test an 'important head start'

Next article

Force India accuses Haas of 'hypocrisy' for F1 protest

Force India accuses Haas of 'hypocrisy' for F1 protest
Load comments
Why Alfa's boss is ready for the task of securing a stronger F1 future Plus

Why Alfa's boss is ready for the task of securing a stronger F1 future

Two tenth places in recent races have lifted Alfa Romeo to the head of Formula 1's 'Class C' battle in 2021, but longer-term the Swiss-based squad has far loftier ambitions. With the new 2022 rules set to level out the playing field, team boss Frederic Vasseur has good reason to be optimistic, as he explained to Autosport in an exclusive interview

How Barnard’s revolutionary McLaren transformed F1 car construction Plus

How Barnard’s revolutionary McLaren transformed F1 car construction

The MP4/1 was pioneering by choice, but a McLaren by chance. STUART CODLING relates the tangled (carbonfibre) weaves which led to the creation of one of motor racing’s defining cars

Why the end is nigh for F1’s most dependable design tool Plus

Why the end is nigh for F1’s most dependable design tool

Windtunnel work forms the bedrock of aerodynamic development in Formula 1. But as PAT SYMONDS explains, advances in virtual research are signalling the end of these expensive and complicated relics

Formula 1
Jun 13, 2021
Why polarising Mosley’s legacy amounts to far more than tabloid rumour Plus

Why polarising Mosley’s legacy amounts to far more than tabloid rumour

The newspapers, naturally, lingered over Max Mosley’s tainted family history and niche sexual practices. But this is to trivialise the legacy of a big beast of motor racing politics. STUART CODLING weighs the life of a man whose work for safety on both road and track has saved hundreds of thousands of lives, but whose penchant for cruelty remains problematic and polarising

Formula 1
Jun 12, 2021
Why pragmatic Perez isn't fazed by no-nonsense Red Bull F1 culture Plus

Why pragmatic Perez isn't fazed by no-nonsense Red Bull F1 culture

Sergio Perez has spent most of his career labouring in Formula 1’s midfield, wondering whether he’d ever get another shot at the big time. Red Bull has handed him that chance and, although life at the top is tough, the Baku winner is doing all the right things to get on terms with Max Verstappen, says BEN ANDERSON

Formula 1
Jun 11, 2021
What the data tells us about the F1 2021 title fight Plus

What the data tells us about the F1 2021 title fight

Formula 1 has been tracking car performance using timing loops mounted every 200m around each circuit – to the extent that it was able to anticipate Ferrari’s 'surprise’ pole in Monaco. PAT SYMONDS explains what this means for this season and beyond

Formula 1
Jun 10, 2021
The weighty issue F1 needs to find a balance with Plus

The weighty issue F1 needs to find a balance with

OPINION: After consecutive street races with contrasting highlights, one theme stood out which has become a prevalent issue with modern Formula 1 cars. But is there a way to solve it or, at least, reach a happy middle ground to help all parties?

Formula 1
Jun 10, 2021
The changes behind a ‘feel-good’ F1 result in Baku Plus

The changes behind a ‘feel-good’ F1 result in Baku

OPINION: The Azerbaijan Grand Prix had elements that make Formula 1 really exciting – unpredictability and shock results. This resulted in heartbreak for several of the championship’s regular contenders and joy for others who rarely reach the ultimate limelight. And one of those on the Baku podium is riding a wave of form he’s keen to continue

Formula 1
Jun 9, 2021