Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

The not-so-obvious chance Leclerc missed to usurp Verstappen

Formula 1
Formula 1
Singapore GP
The not-so-obvious chance Leclerc missed to usurp Verstappen

Cheshire cats de la Roche and Musgrave grin after Silverstone Historic F3 thrillers

National
National
Cheshire cats de la Roche and Musgrave grin after Silverstone Historic F3 thrillers

Dramatic Mini fight goes to the wire as Ovenden wins title by a point at Brands Hatch

National
National
Dramatic Mini fight goes to the wire as Ovenden wins title by a point at Brands Hatch

How Ingram made his mark on the 2026 BTCC campaign – before going out with a bang

BTCC
BTCC
Brands Hatch (Grand Prix Circuit)
How Ingram made his mark on the 2026 BTCC campaign – before going out with a bang

The hidden factor that gives Verstappen and Red Bull extra hope for 2027

Formula 1
Formula 1
Singapore GP
The hidden factor that gives Verstappen and Red Bull extra hope for 2027

From Argentina to Mandalika: The path to Aprilia's ultimate MotoGP race result

MotoGP
MotoGP
Indonesian GP
From Argentina to Mandalika: The path to Aprilia's ultimate MotoGP race result

How last-lap heartbreak turned the Bathurst 1000 on its head

Supercars
Supercars
Bathurst 1000
How last-lap heartbreak turned the Bathurst 1000 on its head

Why Antonelli avoided a penalty despite four track limits incidents in Singapore GP

Formula 1
Formula 1
Singapore GP
Why Antonelli avoided a penalty despite four track limits incidents in Singapore GP

FIA set to tighten up F1 right of review procedure

The FIA is set to change its regulations in order to tighten up the process that allows Formula 1 teams to request a right of review, Autosport understands.

FIA flag

The window for asking for a review after an event will be shortened from the current 14 day period to four days, or 96 hours.

In addition a fee will be introduced, whereas currently there is no charge. 

The plan for change was discussed before the recent request for a review from Haas regarding track limits offences committed by rivals at the US GP that was rejected last week.

However, that case highlights the fact that review requests are more common than they used to be, and the FIA is keen to make teams think twice about pursuing them.

In addition to the Haas example, this year has also seen requests submitted by Aston Martin (Jeddah), Ferrari (Australia) and McLaren (Canada). Only the first of these was successful, as Aston overturned a penalty handed out to Fernando Alonso.

The FIA now intends to tweak both the International Sporting Code and its own judicial rules for 2024, pending approval at the Annual General Assembly in December. The changes will apply to all FIA competitions, and not just F1.

Originally, there was no time limit on a right of review request, so a team could in theory challenge the result of a race that took place months earlier.

That was subsequently changed to 14 days, a limit that Haas took full advantage of when collating its evidence.

The plan is to change that to 96 hours from the end of the competition, although in exceptional circumstances the stewards will be able to extend the deadline to 120 hours.

Nico Hulkenberg, Haas F1 Team, Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes-AMG, arrive in Parc Ferme after the Sprint race

Photo by: Simon Galloway / Motorsport Images

Nico Hulkenberg, Haas F1 Team, Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes-AMG, arrive in Parc Ferme after the Sprint race

A fee equivalent to the cost of an appeal – currently €6,000 in the case of F1 – will be introduced. That will be refunded only if the right of review is upheld by the stewards.

In addition, there are set to be changes to how the appeal system works. 

At the moment teams can submit a notice of intention to appeal, and then have 96 hours during which they can decide whether or not they then pursue the matter with a formal appeal.

The problem with the current system is that a notice of intention to appeal can suspend a penalty. 

Thus, a driver could receive a grid penalty and have it negated by a notice of intention to appeal. The team could then withdraw from the appeal process, having raced from the original grid position.

From now on, even if the notice is withdrawn the matter will be referred to the International Court of Appeal, and the team concerned could receive a penalty if it was deemed that they gained an advantage through the process.

Currently, no fee is payable unless the team then proceeds with the appeal. Henceforth, that fee will have to be paid up front, accompanying the notice of intention to appeal.

Previous article How cold Las Vegas conditions will test F1's engineers
Next article Aston Martin admits it was a mistake to make "painful" F1 experiments so public

Top Comments