BAR, Toyota Exploit Testing Loophole

The testing limitation agreement reached between the non-Ferrari teams has been thrown into chaos after BAR and Toyota chose to exploit a loophole in the accord  and bring extra cars to Jerez, Autosport-Atlas can reveal

BAR, Toyota Exploit Testing Loophole

The non-Ferrari teams had all agreed at the start of this year to a strict testing limit over the course of the season in a bid to bring down costs. They restricted themselves to 30 days running, and stipulated that they could run a maximum of two cars on those days and only test at one track.

The latter limits were laid down in a bid to further keep a lid on costs, so there would be no temptation for teams to fund two separate test teams at different venues, or bring extra personnel or more cars to each test.

But in a controversial move at Jerez, Toyota and BAR have turned up at the test with more than two cars. This week's test is crucially the last before the summer break in August.

Toyota have brought three machines with them, two regular cars and one fitted with a V8 engine, while BAR have brought four different cars with them.

There are three regular machines and one other development car that features components and electronic systems planned for longer-term development. The team want to keep this car's programme separate from their 2005 work.

Toyota made the most of the opportunity with their cars and ran Ralf Schumacher and Ricardo Zonta in their 2005 machines, with Olivier Panis concentrating on the V8 work.

At BAR, Jenson Button concentrated on aerodynamic developments in one car, while Anthony Davidson swapped between two machines. He ran the engine spec planned for the German Grand Prix in one car, before switching to mechanical development in the second car.

BAR's fourth car stayed in the garage but will be run by Takuma Sato tomorrow.

Both Japanese manufacturers made sure not to break the wording of the testing agreement, however, by only running two of their cars on the track at any one time. Their rivals watched them closely all day to ensure there was no breach, although they are far from happy with the situation.  

Their rivals claim that having the use of the extra cars hands the teams a huge advantage, because it virtually guarantees that they will not lose any track time if they suffer problems with one of their other machines.

At Jerez on Wednesday, for example, Williams and McLaren both had their testing compromised because of the two-car limit.

Williams, in need of as much mileage as possible to sort out the aerodynamic issues with their new bodywork, have had to devote one car to V8 testing for BMW, while McLaren were limited because Juan Pablo Montoya was sidelined with an engine failure early on.

One leading team member from a rival team, who did not wish to be identified, told Autosport-Atlas: "What BAR and Toyota are doing is not how we interpreted the regulation. It is a little bit naughty."

The actions of Toyota and BAR will almost certainly increase the danger of all teams now turning up at tests with more than two cars - which will effectively negate any of the cost-saving brought about by the 30-day limit.

Toyota proved that testing costs would go up if teams bring the extra cars after drafting in three separate crews for the three cars at Jerez.

The only way to avoid this situation would be for the teams to reach a fresh agreement closing off the loophole to prevent teams turning up at tracks with extra cars.

The Jerez controversy is not the first time that the wording of the 30-day limit has led to bizarre situations. Earlier this year McLaren famously paid out to send a test team down to Spain just in case a planned outing at Silverstone was rained off.

The Silverstone test went ahead and the other test team enjoyed a day off in the paddock instead.

Other teams have been present at venues but not run because of fears that poor weather later in the day would limit their dry running, and they did not want to lose one of their valuable days doing wet-weather work.

Toyota and BAR's action are in contrast to the lengths that some teams have gone not to break the two-car limit. Renault even asked permission from their rivals to be allowed to shakedown a 2004 demonstration car at Silverstone while their test teams were running elsewhere.

shares
comments
Ralf Fastest at Jerez despite Crash
Previous article

Ralf Fastest at Jerez despite Crash

Next article

Analysis: F1 Dances to a Different Tune

Analysis: F1 Dances to a Different Tune
The inconvenient questions posed by Vettel’s Williams run Plus

The inconvenient questions posed by Vettel’s Williams run

Sebastian Vettel's demo laps on board his own Williams FW14B was not only a great spectacle for the fans, but were carried out with a fully sustainable, carbon-neutral fuel. And it begs the question - for all of the money F1 has spent on championing hybrids and electric components, could it go back to V8s or V10s with a similar kind of fuel?

The pioneering pair who brought a new glory era to an F1 heavyweight  Plus

The pioneering pair who brought a new glory era to an F1 heavyweight 

With the team’s founder now retired and a new boss at the helm, change was coming to Brabham – change that would shape the future of Formula 1. In the third part of our four-part history of Brabham, DAMIEN SMITH examines the effect Bernie Ecclestone had on the team

The combination behind the Silverstone racing battles Hamilton called "F1 at its best" Plus

The combination behind the Silverstone racing battles Hamilton called "F1 at its best"

OPINION: The late battling in the British Grand Prix wowed Formula 1 fans and surely represents the best racing action of the season so far. And there was a cocktail of factors that created the action, from which Carlos Sainz emerged as a popular new winner

Formula 1
Jul 6, 2022
How Ferrari’s Monaco headache became its Silverstone migraine Plus

How Ferrari’s Monaco headache became its Silverstone migraine

OPINION: Ferrari won the British Grand Prix with Carlos Sainz, but it ultimately cost Charles Leclerc a chance to make a bigger dent in Max Verstappen's title lead by leaving the Monegasque out on old tyres towards the end. Like Monaco, indecision over strategy proved to be the Scuderia's biggest issue - and if the team doesn't reflect, the headache can only intensify

Formula 1
Jul 5, 2022
The five factors behind Sainz winning a British GP he’d twice lost Plus

The five factors behind Sainz winning a British GP he’d twice lost

Formula 1 has a newest race winner, in a grand prix the victor appeared to have lost twice, only to charge back to headline a sensational and dramatic British Grand Prix. From a massive start crash to a late sprint finish, here’s how five factors saw Carlos Sainz take his maiden grand prix win

Formula 1
Jul 4, 2022
Why there was no case to answer in Aston’s latest F1 copycat saga Plus

Why there was no case to answer in Aston’s latest F1 copycat saga

The appearance of a revised Aston Martin in Spain caused controversy but PAT SYMONDS explains why the FIA investigation found the Silverstone team had no case to answer

Formula 1
Jul 3, 2022
Why it's Red Bull that really leads a three-way fight so far at Silverstone Plus

Why it's Red Bull that really leads a three-way fight so far at Silverstone

After a slow start to Friday at Silverstone, all the Formula 1 teams had to effectively cram in a day’s worth of practice into one hour. But there was still plenty to learn and while Ferrari topped the times, a three-way battle is brewing ahead of the British Grand Prix

Formula 1
Jul 2, 2022
Why the future is bright for the British GP Plus

Why the future is bright for the British GP

It wasn’t so long ago the situation looked bleak at Silverstone with the future of the British Grand Prix under threat. But a transformation has seen it restored to one of the most important races on the Formula 1 calendar, with bigger and better to come

Formula 1
Jul 1, 2022