Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

BTCC Snetterton: Cammish fastest from Ingram in hot conditions

BTCC
Snetterton (300 Circuit)
BTCC Snetterton: Cammish fastest from Ingram in hot conditions

Norris points out a key problem with F1 2026's energy management demands

Formula 1
Canadian GP
Norris points out a key problem with F1 2026's energy management demands

Can anyone stop Reddick from lifting the NASCAR Cup title?

Feature
NASCAR Cup
Can anyone stop Reddick from lifting the NASCAR Cup title?

Super Formula Suzuka: Fenestraz wins chaotic opening race

Super Formula
Suzuka
Super Formula Suzuka: Fenestraz wins chaotic opening race

Who qualifies for ADUO? Red Bull shares its F1 power unit pecking order

Formula 1
Canadian GP
Who qualifies for ADUO? Red Bull shares its F1 power unit pecking order

The details in Mercedes' Montreal F1 updates

Feature
Formula 1
Canadian GP
The details in Mercedes' Montreal F1 updates

Supercars Symmons Plains: Toyota pair Mostert and Heimgartner share wins

Supercars
Tasmania Super 440
Supercars Symmons Plains: Toyota pair Mostert and Heimgartner share wins

“A serious matter” – why the FIA hit Racing Bulls with a €30,000 fine when Lawson stopped on track

Formula 1
Canadian GP
“A serious matter” – why the FIA hit Racing Bulls with a €30,000 fine when Lawson stopped on track

Australian GP: Red Bull insists Ricciardo fuel-flow rate was legal

The Red Bull Formula 1 team has no doubts that its fuel-flow rate was within the FIA's maximum limits, despite Daniel Ricciardo's exclusion from the Australian Grand Prix

Team boss Christian Horner said on Sunday night that there was 'zero' variance from the 100kg/h limit on Red Bull's own calibrated equipment that it relied on, after faults meant it did not trust the FIA's own sensor.

"These fuel-flow sensors that are provided by the FIA to measure fuel have proved problematic down the pitlane since their introduction in testing," said Horner, speaking after news broke of Daniel Ricciardo's disqualification from second place.

"There have been discrepancies and they have been unreliable - indeed some cars may well have run without them in the race itself or failed in the race itself.

"We had a fuel-flow sensor that was fitted to the car that we believed had an error.

"Based on our calculation on the fuel that the injectors are providing to the engine, which is a calibrated piece of equipment and is consistently standard across the pitlane, there is zero variance."

The stewards' ruling in full

Horner confirmed that Red Bull had been told by the FIA that the governing body felt its fuel-flow use in the race was too high - but said it did not turn down the rate because it felt the governing body's opinion was incorrect as it believed the sensor was producing wrong data.

"They informed us [to turn the flow down], and we informed them that we had serious concerns over their sensors," he said.

"We believed in our reading, otherwise there was a situation where you are reducing significant amounts of power in the engine at a time when we believe we fully comply within the regulations.

"We end up in a situation where, depending on the calibration of your sensor, of plus or minus, it will dictate who is going to be competitive and who isn't."

Previous article Australian GP: FIA says Red Bull ignored fuel flow requests
Next article Felipe Massa reckons Williams may have second quickest F1 car

Top Comments

Latest news