Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

The principles Stella holds dear at McLaren to make the F1 team tick

Feature
Formula 1
The principles Stella holds dear at McLaren to make the F1 team tick

The challenge Haas faces in trying to meet F1 budget cap: "Fighting with both hands tied"

Formula 1
Hungarian GP
The challenge Haas faces in trying to meet F1 budget cap: "Fighting with both hands tied"

Top 10 McLaren F1 cars ranked: MCL39, M23, MP4/4 and more

Feature
Formula 1
Top 10 McLaren F1 cars ranked: MCL39, M23, MP4/4 and more

WRC Rally Finland: Ogier claims lead after incident-packed morning

WRC
Rally Finland
WRC Rally Finland: Ogier claims lead after incident-packed morning

How Pirelli will deal with F1’s unexpected return to Sepang

Formula 1
Bahrain GP in Malaysia
How Pirelli will deal with F1’s unexpected return to Sepang

Thailand to host MotoGP 2027 season opener

MotoGP
Thailand to host MotoGP 2027 season opener

Why progress 'won't satisfy' Red Bull until it can give Verstappen a winning car

Feature
Formula 1
Hungarian GP
Why progress 'won't satisfy' Red Bull until it can give Verstappen a winning car

Lecuona to replace Aldeguer at MotoGP British GP

MotoGP
British GP
Lecuona to replace Aldeguer at MotoGP British GP

Australian GP: Red Bull insists Ricciardo fuel-flow rate was legal

The Red Bull Formula 1 team has no doubts that its fuel-flow rate was within the FIA's maximum limits, despite Daniel Ricciardo's exclusion from the Australian Grand Prix

Team boss Christian Horner said on Sunday night that there was 'zero' variance from the 100kg/h limit on Red Bull's own calibrated equipment that it relied on, after faults meant it did not trust the FIA's own sensor.

"These fuel-flow sensors that are provided by the FIA to measure fuel have proved problematic down the pitlane since their introduction in testing," said Horner, speaking after news broke of Daniel Ricciardo's disqualification from second place.

"There have been discrepancies and they have been unreliable - indeed some cars may well have run without them in the race itself or failed in the race itself.

"We had a fuel-flow sensor that was fitted to the car that we believed had an error.

"Based on our calculation on the fuel that the injectors are providing to the engine, which is a calibrated piece of equipment and is consistently standard across the pitlane, there is zero variance."

The stewards' ruling in full

Horner confirmed that Red Bull had been told by the FIA that the governing body felt its fuel-flow use in the race was too high - but said it did not turn down the rate because it felt the governing body's opinion was incorrect as it believed the sensor was producing wrong data.

"They informed us [to turn the flow down], and we informed them that we had serious concerns over their sensors," he said.

"We believed in our reading, otherwise there was a situation where you are reducing significant amounts of power in the engine at a time when we believe we fully comply within the regulations.

"We end up in a situation where, depending on the calibration of your sensor, of plus or minus, it will dictate who is going to be competitive and who isn't."

Previous article Australian GP: FIA says Red Bull ignored fuel flow requests
Next article Felipe Massa reckons Williams may have second quickest F1 car

Top Comments

Latest news