Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Why Aston Martin is a better destination on the F1 driver market than it seems

Feature
Formula 1
Why Aston Martin is a better destination on the F1 driver market than it seems

What is it like being a Williams F1 simulator driver?

Formula 1
What is it like being a Williams F1 simulator driver?

Marquez expects rivals to risk more in hunt for MotoGP title

MotoGP
British GP
Marquez expects rivals to risk more in hunt for MotoGP title

MotoGP title challenger Bezzecchi pessimistic for British GP

MotoGP
British GP
MotoGP title challenger Bezzecchi pessimistic for British GP

The rising Japanese star with his sights set firmly on IndyCar

Feature
Super Formula
Sugo
The rising Japanese star with his sights set firmly on IndyCar

WRC drivers split on whether Rally Finland was "too fast" after several crashes

WRC
Rally Finland
WRC drivers split on whether Rally Finland was "too fast" after several crashes

Silverstone to continue hosting MotoGP's British GP after new deal

MotoGP
British GP
Silverstone to continue hosting MotoGP's British GP after new deal

Should the algorithms in F1 power units be banned? FIA explains why it won’t work

Formula 1
Should the algorithms in F1 power units be banned? FIA explains why it won’t work

Full Statement by the Court of Appeal

The FIA International Court of Appeal met in Paris on Tuesday, August 19, 2003, to hear the appeal introduced by the Motor Sports Association Ltd, on behalf of competitor BMW WilliamsF1 Team, car n°4: driver Ralf Schumacher, against Stewards' decision No. 41 taken on August 3, 2003, during the German Grand Prix.

The FIA International Court of Appeal met in Paris on Tuesday, August 19, 2003, to hear the appeal introduced by the Motor Sports Association Ltd, on behalf of competitor BMW WilliamsF1 Team, car n°4: driver Ralf Schumacher, against Stewards' decision No. 41 taken on August 3, 2003, during the German Grand Prix.

Having heard the explanations of the parties and examined the various documents and other evidence, the Court confirmed the Stewards' findings against Ralf Schumacher but considered that the sanction imposed (a loss of 10 places on the starting grid at his next Grand Prix) was inappropriate and substituted a fine of 50,000 $US.

It appeared to the Court, in particular from reading the report by Peter Wright (technical and safety consultant) analysing Accident Data Recorder information, not available to the Stewards, that some responsibility might possibly be imputed to the other two drivers involved in the incident. The Court decided that the case should be referred back to the Panel of the Stewards of the German Grand Prix so that the conduct of Rubens Barrichello and Kimi Raikkonen can be considered in light of the evidence from Mr Wright.

The International Court of Appeal was presided over by Mr Philippe Roberti de Winghe (Belgium), and composed of Mr Pedro Romero (Spain), Mr Vassilis Koussis (Greece) and Mr Harry Duijm (Netherlands).

The full text of the International Court of Appeal's decision is available, on request, from the Secretariat of the FIA International Court of Appeal in Paris.

Previous article Appeal court overturns Ralf's grid penalty
Next article Hungary Preview Quotes: Michelin

Top Comments