Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Why Aston Martin is a better destination on the F1 driver market than it seems

Feature
Formula 1
Why Aston Martin is a better destination on the F1 driver market than it seems

What is it like being a Williams F1 simulator driver?

Formula 1
What is it like being a Williams F1 simulator driver?

Marquez expects rivals to risk more in hunt for MotoGP title

MotoGP
British GP
Marquez expects rivals to risk more in hunt for MotoGP title

MotoGP title challenger Bezzecchi pessimistic for British GP

MotoGP
British GP
MotoGP title challenger Bezzecchi pessimistic for British GP

The rising Japanese star with his sights set firmly on IndyCar

Feature
Super Formula
Sugo
The rising Japanese star with his sights set firmly on IndyCar

WRC drivers split on whether Rally Finland was "too fast" after several crashes

WRC
Rally Finland
WRC drivers split on whether Rally Finland was "too fast" after several crashes

Silverstone to continue hosting MotoGP's British GP after new deal

MotoGP
British GP
Silverstone to continue hosting MotoGP's British GP after new deal

Should the algorithms in F1 power units be banned? FIA explains why it won’t work

Formula 1
Should the algorithms in F1 power units be banned? FIA explains why it won’t work

Vodafone Denies Jordan Claims

Vodafone hit back today in its 150 million-pound ($252.3 million) High Court battle with Formula One racing team Jordan, which claims the mobile phone giant wrongly pulled out of a sponsorship deal.

Vodafone hit back today in its 150 million-pound ($252.3 million) High Court battle with Formula One racing team Jordan, which claims the mobile phone giant wrongly pulled out of a sponsorship deal.

Launching its defence, Vodafone said it did not enter into a binding three-year agreement with Jordan as a result of a telephone conversation between its global branding director David Haines and the racing team's boss Eddie Jordan.

Jordan had earlier argued that Haines told Jordan 'You've got the deal' and that, based on previous negotiations between the parties, this statement constituted a binding agreement.

Vodafone claims that, while it conducted discussions with Jordan and four other Formula One constructors in 2001, no agreement was reached with Jordan and no binding contract existed.

It says that as of March 22, 2001 when the conversation between Haines and Jordan is alleged to have taken place, Jordan was aware that many essential terms of any such agreement remained unresolved and that Vodafone had yet to discuss any Formula One sponsorship proposals with its governing bodies.

It claims that, in a letter written after that date, Eddie Jordan recognised that any sponsorship agreement would have to be in writing, and that other correspondence shows that the race team were aware that no agreement had been reached.

It says it is unheard of in Formula One circles for such an important deal to be concluded verbally, and that Jordan was aware that no sponsorship agreement of this value would be entered into in such a way.

It also argues that Haines, who was travelling in the back of a car in Germany at the time, had neither actual nor ostensible authority to conclude a deal of this magnitude, and at no time held himself out to Jordan as having that authority.

The hearing continues.

Previous article Schumacher: 'I deserve to be leading'
Next article McLaren misses Silverstone test

Top Comments

Latest news