Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Why Aston Martin is a better destination on the F1 driver market than it seems

Feature
Formula 1
Why Aston Martin is a better destination on the F1 driver market than it seems

What is it like being a Williams F1 simulator driver?

Formula 1
What is it like being a Williams F1 simulator driver?

Marquez expects rivals to risk more in hunt for MotoGP title

MotoGP
British GP
Marquez expects rivals to risk more in hunt for MotoGP title

MotoGP title challenger Bezzecchi pessimistic for British GP

MotoGP
British GP
MotoGP title challenger Bezzecchi pessimistic for British GP

The rising Japanese star with his sights set firmly on IndyCar

Feature
Super Formula
Sugo
The rising Japanese star with his sights set firmly on IndyCar

WRC drivers split on whether Rally Finland was "too fast" after several crashes

WRC
Rally Finland
WRC drivers split on whether Rally Finland was "too fast" after several crashes

Silverstone to continue hosting MotoGP's British GP after new deal

MotoGP
British GP
Silverstone to continue hosting MotoGP's British GP after new deal

Should the algorithms in F1 power units be banned? FIA explains why it won’t work

Formula 1
Should the algorithms in F1 power units be banned? FIA explains why it won’t work

Ferrari defends F1 commitment

Ferrari has made moves to claim that it did not betray its fellow manufacturers planning the breakaway GPWC series by committing itself unilaterally to Formula 1 until the end of 2012 - even though its move has stirred up a huge amount of controversy

The reigning world champion's decision has effectively ended hopes of the GPWC forming its own series - and has sparked outrage from several teams who will be pressured into making their own commitment at a meeting with F1 supremo Bernie Ecclestone in London today.

But after declining to comment until now, Ferrari has issued a statement claiming that it kept its fellow GPWC members (Renault, BMW and Mercedes-Benz) fully informed of its plans.

"Back in the end of July 2004, Ferrari had informed in writing the other members of the GPWC that, as from 1st August of that same year, it would not be bound exclusively to the GPWC, while nevertheless remaining part of it," said the statement. "It intended examining the possibility of an agreement with the FIA and FOM regarding the long term future of the FIA Formula 1 World Championship."

Most interestingly, the statement also publicly declared that the more generous terms Ferrari had agreed to with Ecclestone in its new version of the Concorde Agreement, the document by which F1 is run, would come into effect from the start of this year - and not from 2008 after the current deal runs out.

"As a result of what was established in the agreement announced on the 19th of this month, the new version of the Concorde Agreement will come into effect from 2005 on the revenues owed to the signatories thereof," it read.

This latter comment may have been included as a means of putting further pressure on the teams to sign up to a new offer from Ecclestone.

Previous article Ferrari Clarify GPWC Position
Next article McLaren Seek to Benefit from Third Car

Top Comments

Latest news