Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Spool party: How F1's drivers will fight against turbo lag in Monaco

Feature
Formula 1
Monaco GP
Spool party: How F1's drivers will fight against turbo lag in Monaco

Why Norris and Leclerc have been summoned to the FIA stewards before hitting the track in Monaco

Formula 1
Monaco GP
Why Norris and Leclerc have been summoned to the FIA stewards before hitting the track in Monaco

Marquez to "forget" about Hungarian GP podium as he offers recovery update

MotoGP
Hungarian GP
Marquez to "forget" about Hungarian GP podium as he offers recovery update

What makes the Le Mans 24 Hours so special?

Feature
WEC
24 Hours of Le Mans
What makes the Le Mans 24 Hours so special?

Bagnaia: Lack of Balaton Park safety changes linked to circuit's uncertain MotoGP future

MotoGP
Hungarian GP
Bagnaia: Lack of Balaton Park safety changes linked to circuit's uncertain MotoGP future

F1 teams fit unique rear wings for Monaco GP

Formula 1
Monaco GP
F1 teams fit unique rear wings for Monaco GP

Newey set to return to F1 paddock in Monaco

Formula 1
Monaco GP
Newey set to return to F1 paddock in Monaco

The best Saturday of the year? Why F1 must accept Monaco for what it is

Feature
Formula 1
Monaco GP
The best Saturday of the year? Why F1 must accept Monaco for what it is

F1 removing MGU-H for 2021 engines a 'backwards step' - Mercedes

The decision to drop the MGU-H is a "backwards step" for Formula 1's 2021 engine regulations, according to Mercedes' powertrain boss Andy Cowell

Last year the FIA outlined a detailed plan to lose the thermal energy recovery element for the next generation of F1's hybrid engines, which it reiterated last month.

Honda technical director Toyoharu Tanabe said his company would "miss" the component, and F1's other engine manufacturers agreed they supported keeping the MGU-H when asked by Autosport.

Cowell, the managing director of Mercedes High Performance Powertrains, said it will remove "a lot of energy" from the engines.

He explained the MGU-H provides 60% of the electric energy used to power the other part of the energy recovery system, the MGU-K, and contributes 5% of the current engine's thermal efficiency.

"The MGU-H has been blamed for the lack of noise and for high complexity," said Cowell.

"It's been referred to as a miracle. There are four technology companies that have made it work.

"To make up the power difference we're going to have to increase the fuel flow rate, which is a backwards step.

"It's not progress. It feels like a backwards step when the development work has been done."

Cowell said engine manufacturers would now need to develop anti-lag systems for the turbocharged engines as the MGU-H is "the most marvellous anti-lag system because it gives you speed control".

He added: "We'll have to come up with various systems and devices and that will probably involve burning some fuel through the exhaust, which doesn't feel the most honourable thing to do as an engineer.

"But it's a balance between technology and entertainment and we've got to get that balance right."

Ferrari technical director Mattia Binotto said Cowell's examples were evidence of the MGU-H being a "fantastic, efficient component".

However, he said the need for compromise in pursuit of "better noise, simplification and costs" is why Ferrari "accept" the MGU-H will be removed.

"When you are dealing with compromises there are always different opinions," he said.

"It doesn't mean we need to standardise all the power unit components.

"It's important we maintain the challenge of these technologies and maintain the engine as a competitive differentiator between the manufacturers because that is the DNA of F1."

Renault's engine technical director Remi Taffin said all four manufacturers had outlined their desire to keep the MGU-H as part of an "initial proposal".

He claimed that there were now "alternatives", and Renault would find other uses for the technology.

"We are trying to have good discussions to go forward for keeping developing this power unit in a different way," he said.

"We did a lot of work on the MGU-H, it's working, it's a very nice part. It's not something we will put on the shelf and forget.

"We have other projects, we have Formula E.

"The MGU-H is not directly translatable but it's a high-speed motor, it's quite a unique technology, and we're not going to put that on the shelf."

Previous article The stealth favourite for the Spanish GP
Next article Spanish GP: Magnussen reprimanded for 'dangerous' FP1 Leclerc block

Top Comments

Latest news