Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Why the WEC's BoP blackout is a bad call for all parties

Feature
WEC
Imola
Why the WEC's BoP blackout is a bad call for all parties

Are F1's technical changes for Miami enough to ease 2026 concerns?

Feature
Formula 1
Are F1's technical changes for Miami enough to ease 2026 concerns?

FIA confirms changes to 2026 F1 rules ahead of Miami GP

Formula 1
Miami GP
FIA confirms changes to 2026 F1 rules ahead of Miami GP

Wolff warns against ADUO “gamesmanship”: Only one F1 manufacturer has a problem

Formula 1
Wolff warns against ADUO “gamesmanship”: Only one F1 manufacturer has a problem

Why 2026 F1 rule changes involve "a scalpel, not a baseball bat"

Formula 1
Miami GP
Why 2026 F1 rule changes involve "a scalpel, not a baseball bat"

Cars and stars from the 2026 Goodwood Members’ Meeting

General
Cars and stars from the 2026 Goodwood Members’ Meeting

Sutton takes early BTCC lead after Donington Park opener

Feature
BTCC
Donington Park (National Circuit)
Sutton takes early BTCC lead after Donington Park opener

Close encounters bookend glorious Goodwood’s 83rd Members’ Meeting

General
Close encounters bookend glorious Goodwood’s 83rd Members’ Meeting

How tweaks to fuel rules could affect the 2017 Formula 1 season

While most of the spotlight of Formula 1's 2017 rule changes is on the aerodynamic revamp, there are significant changes under the fin-style engine covers too

With the engine token system gone, restrictions on fuel blends, weight and materials will instead be used to try to limit manufacturers' scope for excess expenditure.

For 2017, each team will only be able to nominate five fuel blends for the season, and only two at any given race weekend. Previously, an unlimited number was on offer.

This will heavily reduce the scope for vast changes between qualifying and race conditions, along with restricting teams' flexibility to run fuel blends tailored to different circuits' characteristics.

Even for a team with a close and stable relationship with a fuel and lubricant supplier - such as Mercedes with Petronas - this will require some adaptation.

The impact will really be felt by teams affected by the fuel partner shuffle going on elsewhere, as Red Bull switches to Exxon/Mobil and McLaren moves to BP/Castrol. Renault too is poised to confirm a move away from Total imminently.

At least Red Bull can benefit from the wealth of experience Mobil built up with McLaren and its previous engine partners Mercedes and Honda.

And though BP is three seasons behind in development understanding, it will build a database quickly - especially if it does add Renault and Toro Rosso to its roster.

Lubricant quality is key to power output throughout the rev range, efficiency and reliability in F1 engines.

Teams' suppliers travel around the world with them, setting up their own labs in the pitlane to check legality, monitor their products' performance, help make decisions on what specifications should be used and, in some circumstances, spot potential failures before they even happen.

There is a hefty workload at each race. As fuel is shipped direct to each grand prix, the engineers must first check it hasn't been contaminated and won't fall foul of the FIA's scrutineering processes.

A gas chromatography machine breaks down the fuel and makes sure its molecular make-up matches the sample held by the FIA. Around 40 samples are tested each GP weekend.

It's not only the fuel that is under scrutiny in the fuel suppliers' trackside lab, with tests conducted on the oil being run through the V6 hybrid power unit and the gearbox too.

Shell, for example, uses a rotating disc electrode optical imaging spectography device (or RDEOES for short), to test the lubricant for any sign of metallic contaminants that might signal too much wear and a looming failure.

The lubricant-makers also face a challenge from the new aerodynamic regulations, as the substantial rise in cornering speeds will increase the forces placed on all areas of the car and the life expectancy of components.

THE POST-TOKEN SOLUTION

The token system was a logical move by the FIA ahead of the turbo hybrid era, as it looked to contain spending and development.

But it backfired when Mercedes began with a monumental advantage and its rivals lacked opportunities to close the gap with their development restricted.

For 2017, the manufacturers and FIA agreed to a different approach - with restrictions now focused on weight and dimension.

The weight of the MGU-K and MGU-H can be no less than 7kg and 4kg respectively, and there are stipulations for the weight of the pistons, rods and crankshaft (no less than 300g, 300g and 5300g respectively) too.

The rules have also added dimensional restrictions to the crankshaft bearings, limiting the compression ratio of the cylinders (no higher than 18.0) and limiting coating thickness for gold, platinum, ruthenium, iridium and rhenium to 0.035mm.

These changes are designed to limit development, preventing the manufacturers from chasing finite gains - and updates will have to be more considered too, now that drivers only get four power units per season.

Previous article Felipe Massa can keep F1 chassis Williams gave him for retirement
Next article Marcus Ericsson a potential grand prix winner says Sauber F1 boss

Top Comments