Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Indecent proposal? How Sainz's big idea to change F1 qualifying might work

Feature
Formula 1
British GP
Indecent proposal? How Sainz's big idea to change F1 qualifying might work

Why Ferrari fears "deficit could be twice as big" to Mercedes at Silverstone and Spa

Formula 1
British GP
Why Ferrari fears "deficit could be twice as big" to Mercedes at Silverstone and Spa

How "charging station" Silverstone will really look different in F1 2026

Formula 1
British GP
How "charging station" Silverstone will really look different in F1 2026

Alonso denies claim that Aston Martin's Hungarian GP upgrade will decide his F1 future

Formula 1
British GP
Alonso denies claim that Aston Martin's Hungarian GP upgrade will decide his F1 future

Dixon to leave Chip Ganassi Racing at end of 2026 IndyCar season

IndyCar
Mid-Ohio
Dixon to leave Chip Ganassi Racing at end of 2026 IndyCar season

Kay back to the top of Autosport National Rankings table

National
Kay back to the top of Autosport National Rankings table

Alonso: Silverstone will be "not fun to drive" with 2026 F1 cars

Formula 1
British GP
Alonso: Silverstone will be "not fun to drive" with 2026 F1 cars

Motorsport UK and BRDC unite to develop young British drivers

National
Motorsport UK and BRDC unite to develop young British drivers

Renault backs Ferrari's stance on F1 engine freeze

Renault has backed Ferrari in suggesting that lifting Formula 1's engine freeze will not lead to a dramatic hiking in costs

A crunch Formula 1 Commission meeting is scheduled to vote later this month on a proposal to relax engine development rules and allow some in-season modifications.

While Ferrari, Renault and Honda are in favour of the change, Mercedes is against the move - and has vowed to block the regulation tweak going ahead.

Renault: Caught in the F1 crossfire

It argues that such a late change to rules for 2015 will only lead to a big ramping up in expenditure that will need to be passed on to customer teams.

Renault is not so sure, though, and thinks that with careful planning it is possible to allow in-season changes without it being hugely expensive.

Remi Taffin, Renault's head of track operations, told AUTOSPORT: "In terms of development it [the engine] is being developed anyway, so the guys, computers and dynos will be running.

"It's fair to say we will be spending the money we've got and running the means we've got.

"At some point if it's a matter of introducing [an upgrade] mid-season then it's just a matter of a few parts that will be overlayed at some point, but it's not going to be a massive overspending I think."

Taffin does warn, however, that costs could rise dramatically if a manufacturer started running parallel development programmes on its engines.

"If you choose a plan A for the start of the season and plan B from July onwards, then it could be costing a lot - because you have to double the sourcing of parts," he said.

Taffin says that Renault's development push for the start of 2015 will not ease off if the relaxation of the freeze happens.

"We are still developing it [the engine] - and it is more a matter of phasing in what we are going to be introducing in Melbourne.

"We have not yet dropped anything for the first race. Everything that will come through and is not possible for Melbourne, we will slot it in later in the year."

Previous article Analysis: Could Formula 1 cockpit canopies work?
Next article Negativity over 2014 rules still hurting Formula 1 - Alain Prost

Top Comments

Latest news