Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes AMG F1, 2nd position, pours Champagne over James Allison, Technical Director, Mercedes AMG, on the podium
Feature
Opinion

The ulterior motive behind Mercedes' F1 engineering talent stockpile

When talented Formula 1 engineers start to think about retiring or taking up other interests, it creates headaches for their current employers when rival teams come sniffing. This, as STUART CODLING explains, could answer what was behind the planned Mercedes engineering management reshuffle

Monopolising the talent pool is a virtually surefire way to ensure success in Formula 1. Until pretty recently, for instance, Mercedes had so many former technical directors from other teams on its books that it seemed to have one for every day of the week and another for Sunday best.

Aside from laying hands on sufficient coin of the realm to pay all those salaries, the challenge is how to manage that inevitable moment when they decide they want to leave – either for another team or to enjoy more time on the sofa, spending Sundays digesting Bridgerton or somesuch froth rather than performance data.

Long-time McLaren insiders remember what ensued when John Barnard signalled his intention to move to Ferrari: blazing rows, followed by Ron Dennis flying to Maranello to have it out with Enzo Ferrari personally. Ron thought nobody would be left to design his car, temporarily forgetting there was a whole team responsible for putting pen to paper.

Even today, while no one person is responsible for drawing every detail of the car, senior engineers with a vision of car concept and performance remain highly prized. That’s why, to flick back to the 1980s, Dennis tried to ‘get medieval’ with Ferrari, then poached the inventive and highly rated Gordon Murray from Brabham (parenthetically, authorship of the legendary MP4/4 remains the subject of a bunfight too steeped in angst to go into here).

John Barnard and Ron Dennis, 1995 Brazilian Grand Prix

John Barnard and Ron Dennis, 1995 Brazilian Grand Prix

Photo by: Ercole Colombo/Motorsport Images

It’s also why, when Murray pronounced himself sick of F1’s ever tighter regulations, Ron threw him the F1 road car project – better to sink millions into that than let Murray ‘retire’ and be recruited by someone else. What was Murray doing between 1998, when the last F1 was built, and 2004, when he left McLaren? Not being involved in the design of any other team’s racing cars, that’s for sure. More recently, Red Bull has had to perform the same dance of the seven veils to keep Adrian Newey on board.

PLUS: The clues Hamilton’s F1 contract afterthought gives to his future

The concept of being ‘paid and displayed’ remains alive and well, it seems. A few weeks ago, Mercedes issued a press released detailing a new management structure in which technical director James Allison would move to a newly created chief technical officer role, with technology director Mike Elliott slotting in as technical director.

Essentially the chief technical officer role has been created by team principal Toto Wolff to keep Allison engaged as part of the organisation, rather than drifting into a retirement from which he might quickly become bored, as creative and driven people are wont to do

In the carefully crafted corporate communication, Allison said “people have a shelf life in senior roles in this sport”, and that it was “the right time for the organisation and myself” to step aside so the team would “benefit from the freshness” a new person might bring to the role.

Subsequent conversations have added more nuance, as Allison revealed that establishing an end point formed part of his last round of contract negotiations in 2019.

“I wanted to make sure I could be true to this team,” he said, “to make sure that I committed to being a technical director over a period where I could earn my salt but not to outstay my welcome, and to know when the right time to step away was. I would much rather that was done while I was still useful than becoming an old embarrassment…”

Andrew Shovlin, chief race engineer, Mercedes AMG, and James Allison, technical director, Mercedes AMG, on the pitwall

Andrew Shovlin, chief race engineer, Mercedes AMG, and James Allison, technical director, Mercedes AMG, on the pitwall

Photo by: Steve Etherington / Motorsport Images

Essentially the chief technical officer role has been created by team principal Toto Wolff to keep Allison engaged as part of the organisation, rather than drifting into a retirement from which he might quickly become bored, as creative and driven people are wont to do.

This Allison has tacitly acknowledged, saying, “I thought I would be stepping away to my sofa to cheer the team from the sidelines as a punter. Happily, Toto saw it a little differently.”

The new role will enable Allison to “focus on longer wavelength” stuff and not tread on Elliott’s toes. Who knows? In the next 15 years he might design the ultimate road car…

James Allison, technical director, Mercedes AMG in the press conference

James Allison, technical director, Mercedes AMG in the press conference

Photo by: Mark Sutton / Motorsport Images

Previous article Leclerc to start Monaco GP from pole after Ferrari gearbox check
Next article McLaren F1 team will help Ricciardo "recalibrate" - Seidl

Top Comments

More from GP Racing

Latest news