TF105 will change 'substantially'

Toyota's new TF105 chassis - unveiled to the world in an event at Barcelona's Estacio de France railway station today (Saturday) - may look substantially different by the time the 2005 Formula 1 season begins in March

The team revealed at the launch that a revised aerodynamic package would be seen on the new car in Melbourne. The changes to Formula 1's technical regulations for 2005 have led to a programme of constant development and alteration at Toyota, with the team working hard to minimise the amount of downforce lost as a result of the new rules.

"Initially, we lost around 25 per cent of downforce with the new aero regulations, but we are striving to reduce this by the largest possible amount in time for the first race of the season in Australia," said Toyota's technical director Mike Gascoyne.

Because the new regulations represent such a substantial change to the F1 rules, Toyota stopped development on its 2004 car last summer and instead focussed on ensuring that the 2005 chassis maximised the possibilities of the revised rules - although the TF105 is ostensibly an evolution of its predecessor.

The new car's electronic systems have been specifically designed to aid tyre durability, as teams will be unable to change tyres during races from the start of this season. The engine department, led by Luca Marmorini, has had to design a unit capable of lasting twice the duration required in 2004. Toyota has also engaged in unprecedented levels of windtunnel activity as it tries to negate the downforce-reducing effect of the regulations as much as possible.

"We have placed a lot more resources into the windtunnel area over the last year and I hope that the TF105 will represent the fruits of our labours," said Gascoyne. "Since the end of 2003 we have restructured the chassis area considerably in order to place more emphasis on our work in the windtunnel, not simply to increase the number of parts being tested, but more importantly to enhance the accuracy of the results."

Although conforming to the 2005 rules has required drastic action by Toyota, much of the new car can still be traced back to last season's TF104B.

"Mechanically, the car is an evolution," said chief designer Gustav Brunner. "We worked hard to reduce the weight of the car from the TF104 to the TF104B. This has now naturally progressed to the TF105, but the devil is in the detail, so we have made many meticulous changes to the mechanical side of the car."

This attention to improving the detail of the design has been one of the team's main aims, as Gascoyne explained: "Aside from the aerodynamics, we have improved in all other areas of the car by paying close attention to the detailed design," he said. "Gustav and his team have looked at the entire mechanical package and put in a large effort particularly on the rear end of the car, something we felt was one of our weaknesses last season.

"We have greatly enhanced stiffness and damping characteristics at the rear of the TF105. As part of this process, we have also concentrated on producing a lighter and stiffer gearbox."

Gascoyne also believes that the integration between chassis and engine departments at Toyota has proved to be a significant advantage in the new design. "We have worked closely on the engine installation, producing a significantly improved package," he said. "Overall performance has not been compromised at any stage and there has been a highly proficient co-operation between chassis and engine, which is only possible with Toyota's all-under-one-roof philosophy."

shares
comments

Ralf Expects to Fight for Podiums by End of Season

Toyota engine 'among the best'

Why the end of F1’s design divergence is nothing to be sad about 

Why the end of F1’s design divergence is nothing to be sad about 

Plus
Plus
Formula 1
Jonathan Noble

Why the end of F1’s design divergence is nothing to be sad about  Why the end of F1’s design divergence is nothing to be sad about 

Why Mercedes may be wrong to be so cagey on new F1 expectations

Why Mercedes may be wrong to be so cagey on new F1 expectations

Plus
Plus
Formula 1
Alex Kalinauckas

Why Mercedes may be wrong to be so cagey on new F1 expectations Why Mercedes may be wrong to be so cagey on new F1 expectations

Is this F1's most underrated driver of 2023?

Is this F1's most underrated driver of 2023?

Plus
Plus
Formula 1
Spanish GP
Jake Boxall-Legge

Is this F1's most underrated driver of 2023? Is this F1's most underrated driver of 2023?

Spanish Grand Prix Driver Ratings 2023

Spanish Grand Prix Driver Ratings 2023

Plus
Plus
Formula 1
Spanish GP
Jake Boxall-Legge

Spanish Grand Prix Driver Ratings 2023 Spanish Grand Prix Driver Ratings 2023

Why Verstappen's 2023 Spanish GP win wasn't as simple as it looked

Why Verstappen's 2023 Spanish GP win wasn't as simple as it looked

Plus
Plus
Formula 1
Spanish GP
Alex Kalinauckas

Why Verstappen's 2023 Spanish GP win wasn't as simple as it looked Why Verstappen's 2023 Spanish GP win wasn't as simple as it looked

How F1 teams manage the punishing reality of F1’s relentless schedule

How F1 teams manage the punishing reality of F1’s relentless schedule

Plus
Plus
Formula 1
GP Racing

How F1 teams manage the punishing reality of F1’s relentless schedule How F1 teams manage the punishing reality of F1’s relentless schedule

The war reality that shines a light on the job Red Bull is doing

The war reality that shines a light on the job Red Bull is doing

Plus
Plus
Formula 1
Monaco GP
Jonathan Noble

The war reality that shines a light on the job Red Bull is doing The war reality that shines a light on the job Red Bull is doing

How Mercedes' new F1 upgrades fared - and what's next for the revitalised W14

How Mercedes' new F1 upgrades fared - and what's next for the revitalised W14

Plus
Plus
Formula 1
Monaco GP
Jake Boxall-Legge

How Mercedes' new F1 upgrades fared - and what's next for the revitalised W14 How Mercedes' new F1 upgrades fared - and what's next for the revitalised W14

Subscribe