Technical analysis: the science of fuel-flow sensors in F1
AUTOSPORT technical expert CRAIG SCARBOROUGH explains the science of Formula 1's 2014 fuel-flow regulations following the exclusion of Daniel Ricciardo's Red Bull from the Australian Grand Prix
Two fuel restrictions were introduced for the 2014 season: an instantaneous fuel-flow limit of 100kg/hour, and a race fuel limit of 100kg.
In Australia, and the wake of the exclusion of Daniel Ricciardo's Red Bull, all eyes have been on the former of those two regulations.
The instantaneous fuel-flow restriction is a measure of the amount of fuel flowing into the engine at any given point in time.
A formula based on RPM is used to determine and monitor that flow, with the full 100kg/hour available at 10,500 RPM.
| Red Bull fuel flow controversy |
| Ricciardo excluded from Australian GP |
| The stewards' ruling in full |
| FIA: Red Bull ignored requests |
 |
The flow restriction is designed to cap engine power - without it, teams would be free to burn lots of fuel at certain points of the lap while still adhering to the race-fuel limit.
This also applies to qualifying, where teams would otherwise be able to use specific engine maps that would not have to adhere to the race fuel limit.
Running more fuel flow than the 100kg/hr restriction provides an obvious power benefit, and any team doing so - intentionally or by accident - is in clear contravention of the rules.
To enforce the regulation, the FIA uses an ultrasonic sensor that gauges the mass of fuel passing through to the engine and feeds this back to the FIA and the team. The sensor is contactless to ensure that it does not restrict fuel flow.
The challenge has been to ensure these sensors are both accurate and reliable, with several teams complaining of deficiencies in both areas over the Australian GP weekend.
With the sensor designed to be accurate to within a fraction of a percentage, the FIA can apply a 'correction factor' to bring them into an acceptably accurate range. This was done in Australia, with the FIA changing the frequency of the sensors from 5Hz to 10Hz.
Even if the sensor fails it is still possible to calculate the fuel flow via readings from the fuel pressure and injector timings. This is not as accurate as the sensor, but does at least provide a reserve option.
The FIA therefore has to take the sensor - plus its correction factor - and/or a calculated fuel-flow reading as the de facto measure for a car or team.
With Red Bull insisting its fuel-flow rate was legal, any decision will be massively important, setting a precedent for the future operational procedures of every team on the grid.
Kimi Raikkonen says immediate fix to F1 Ferrari issues unlikely
Red Bull blames 'immature' F1 technology for FIA sensor mistrust
The “solemn promise” that cost quiet hero Brooks an F1 title
After two terrifying crashes, one of the best British racers of the 1950s retired before his career peaked. But that’s why GP Racing’s MAURICE HAMILTON was able to speak to Tony Brooks in 2014. Like his friend Stirling Moss, Brooks was regarded as one of the best drivers never to have won the world championship. Here, as our tribute to Brooks who died last month, is that interview in full
Inside the Faenza facility where AlphaTauri’s F1 pragmatic vision is realised
AlphaTauri’s mission in F1 is to sell clothes and train young drivers rather than win the championship – but you still need a cutting-edge factory to do that. Team boss Franz Tost takes GP Racing’s OLEG KARPOV on a guided tour of a facility that’s continuing to grow
Connecting two of Ferrari's favourite F1 sons
Gilles Villeneuve's exploits behind the wheel of a Ferrari made him a legend to the tifosi, even 40 years after his death. The team's current Formula 1 star Charles Leclerc enjoys a similar status, and recently got behind the wheel of a very special car from the French-Canadian’s career
How a 30cm metal wire triggered open warfare in the F1 paddock
Porpoising has become the key talking point during the 2022 Formula 1 season, as teams battle to come to terms with it. An FIA technical directive ahead of the Canadian Grand Prix and a second stay appearing on the Mercedes cars only served to create a bigger debate and raise tensions further
Does Verstappen have any weaknesses left?
Having extended his Formula 1 points lead with victory in Canada, Max Verstappen has raised his game further following his 2021 title triumph. Even on the days where Red Bull appears to be second best to Ferrari, Verstappen is getting the most out of the car in each race. So, does he have any weaknesses that his title rivals can exploit?
How F1's future fuels can shape the automotive sector
In 2026, Formula 1 plans to make the switch to a fully sustainable fuel, as the greater automotive world considers its own alternative propulsion methods. Biogasoline and e-fuels both have merit as 'drop-in' fuels but, equally, both have their shortcomings...
The breakthrough behind Sainz’s best weekend of F1 2022 so far
OPINION: Carlos Sainz came close to winning in Monaco but needed that race’s specific circumstances for his shot at a maiden Formula 1 victory to appear. Last weekend in Canada, he led the line for Ferrari in Charles Leclerc’s absence from the front. And there’s a key reason why Sainz has turned his 2022 form around
Canadian Grand Prix Driver Ratings 2022
Plenty of high scores but just a single perfect 10 from the first Montreal race in three years, as Max Verstappen fended off late pressure from Carlos Sainz. Here’s Autosport’s assessment on the Formula 1 drivers from the Canadian Grand Prix