Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

What McLaren thought of Piastri's explosive F1 Hungarian GP radio outburst

Formula 1
Hungarian GP
What McLaren thought of Piastri's explosive F1 Hungarian GP radio outburst

How Norris shrugged off his first-lap error to deliver on McLaren's Hungarian GP pace

Feature
Formula 1
Hungarian GP
How Norris shrugged off his first-lap error to deliver on McLaren's Hungarian GP pace

BTCC Thruxton: Ingram wins race three despite penalty to cut into Sutton’s lead

BTCC
Thruxton
BTCC Thruxton: Ingram wins race three despite penalty to cut into Sutton’s lead

New Honda F1 engine to debut in Aston Martin filming day ahead of Dutch GP

Formula 1
Hungarian GP
New Honda F1 engine to debut in Aston Martin filming day ahead of Dutch GP

Piastri slams "unacceptable" Sainz blue-flag incident, accepts McLaren strategy in Hungarian GP

Formula 1
Hungarian GP
Piastri slams "unacceptable" Sainz blue-flag incident, accepts McLaren strategy in Hungarian GP

How blue-flag malfunction caused chaos in F1 Hungarian GP

Formula 1
Hungarian GP
How blue-flag malfunction caused chaos in F1 Hungarian GP

DS Penske had key to success in Formula E Tokyo E-Prix

Formula E
Tokyo ePrix II
DS Penske had key to success in Formula E Tokyo E-Prix

Why Sainz only got a five-second penalty for Hungarian GP clash with Piastri

Formula 1
Hungarian GP
Why Sainz only got a five-second penalty for Hungarian GP clash with Piastri

Q & A with Patrick Head

Conducted and provided by Williams's press office

Conducted and provided by Williams's press office

Q. Was the team's 2002 performance a profound disappointment for you?

Patrick Head:

Well, second place in the Constructors' Championship was a step forward from 2001, but you can't duck the old adage that we were, in truth, the first of the losers. We heaped expectations upon ourselves, and these were added to by the public at large, our sponsors and the media, to be competitive with Ferrari. We fell short of that, and there is no other way of describing that than disappointing. Naturally, we intend to do better next year.

Q. And what was the key to Ferrari's success?

PH:

Well, although the obvious answer might appear to be 'speed', in many respects it was their unrivalled reliability that underpinned their success. If you remember, every time a Ferrari got away from the grid last season, it finished the race, which is remarkable really. Because of a significant performance advantage, though, they were able to run their engines less hard than us or perhaps McLaren, and this probably in turn contributed to the reliability they managed to achieve.

Q. It seems that WilliamsF1 is responding to the challenge. What precise changes and developments are underway at Grove?

PH:

The growth you refer to goes right across the company, but from a technical perspective, we are expanding the design group, the wind tunnel operation, and manufacturing as well.

Q. What can you tell us about your plans for a new wind tunnel?

PH:

Well, first and foremost, it won't have any impact on the 2003 car of course. Our existing facility has not remained static, and we have been developing the tunnel continuously, but aside from increasing our capacity and effectively doubling our experimental resource, current tunnels should address how the wheels are supported, how the model is supported, the quality of the airflow in terms of how good the boundary layer is, transient testing and so on.

Previous article Q & A with BMW Motorsport Bosses
Next article Q & A with Frank Williams

Top Comments