Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

How the 2027 MotoGP grid is shaping up

MotoGP
How the 2027 MotoGP grid is shaping up

Why Lindblad’s Montreal setback masked another statement weekend

Feature
Formula 1
Canadian GP
Why Lindblad’s Montreal setback masked another statement weekend

Why McLaren thinks it wouldn’t have beaten Hamilton and Verstappen in Canada

Formula 1
Canadian GP
Why McLaren thinks it wouldn’t have beaten Hamilton and Verstappen in Canada

History repeats as 70th anniversary of Mallory Park is celebrated

National
History repeats as 70th anniversary of Mallory Park is celebrated

How Sutton's BTCC steamroller overcame Snetterton challenges

Feature
BTCC
Snetterton (300 Circuit)
How Sutton's BTCC steamroller overcame Snetterton challenges

Rossi faces key decision: Who will replace di Giannantonio at VR46?

MotoGP
Catalan GP
Rossi faces key decision: Who will replace di Giannantonio at VR46?

Red Bull reacts to Verstappen’s criticism – why ‘I told you’ moments are needed

Formula 1
Canadian GP
Red Bull reacts to Verstappen’s criticism – why ‘I told you’ moments are needed

Mini miracles as remarkable podium stories play out at Snetterton

National
Mini miracles as remarkable podium stories play out at Snetterton

Q & A with Pat Symonds

Conducted and provided by Renault's press office

Q. Pat, how do you look back over the 2006 season?

Pat Symonds - Renault's director of engineering: To win a world title is always an honour for the people involved. But to do the same again the following year, with a double championship victory, is an achievement that really deserves recognition. It proves that the previous year's success was in no way lucky. These results are the consequence of a clearly-defined strategy, and unstinting work from the whole team.

Q. How did your approach change from 2005 to 2006?

PS: Our only rivals this year were Ferrari, and they have always enjoyed exceptional reliability. So managing our lead, or going conservative, were never an option. We had to go on the offensive. We knew that the level of performance of the Ferrari was similar to our R26 and that most of the time, the differences came from differing tyre characteristics.

There was no way of knowing, before the race weekend, if we would have the upper hand. And the balance of power between Michelin and Bridgestone could change literally overnight. That meant we needed to be adaptable in our approach.

Q. You have said this season was among the toughest of your career. Why?

PS: First of all, the battle on track was tough. Really tough. Our rivals didn't seem to have any weaknesses, or almost none. We had to seize every little opportunity. And it was a difficult season politically as well. It was hard to come to terms with events like the mass damper affair and Fernando's penalty in Monza.

Q. The team seemed to cope with the pressure though. How did you keep the motivation high?

PS: We worked very hard to keep everybody motivated. We explained the situation to them, and made sure everybody remained confident. They were already world champions, and there was no reason why they could not do it again.

Q. Finally, if you could start the season again, what mistakes would you want to avoid?

PS: With the benefit of hindsight, I would make sure we redesigned the wheel nut mechanism before Budapest, not afterwards! And I would not have changed Fernando's front tyres in China. Those two mistakes cost us two wins. But in terms of our approach, our philosophy and how we went racing this year, I wouldn't change a thing.

Previous article Analysis: all-new Ferrari for Raikkonen
Next article Grapevine: Another setback for Mansell's plans

Top Comments