Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Vinales after German GP woes: “I need support from team but all I get is criticism”

MotoGP
German GP
Vinales after German GP woes: “I need support from team but all I get is criticism”

What we learned as MotoGP's title fight tightened in German GP

Feature
MotoGP
German GP
What we learned as MotoGP's title fight tightened in German GP

What would you like to ask Esteban Ocon?

Formula 1
Belgian GP
What would you like to ask Esteban Ocon?

MotoGP German Grand Prix as it happened

MotoGP
German GP
MotoGP German Grand Prix as it happened

WEC Brazil: BMW pips Ferrari to second Hypercar win of 2026

WEC
Interlagos
WEC Brazil: BMW pips Ferrari to second Hypercar win of 2026

MotoGP German GP: Marc Marquez takes clean sweep with dominant victory

MotoGP
German GP
MotoGP German GP: Marc Marquez takes clean sweep with dominant victory

Bezzecchi undergoes successful surgery in Italy, targets British GP return

MotoGP
German GP
Bezzecchi undergoes successful surgery in Italy, targets British GP return

Why Leclerc’s battle of the brakes has left him trailing his Ferrari team-mate

Feature
Formula 1
Why Leclerc’s battle of the brakes has left him trailing his Ferrari team-mate

Q & A with Pat Symonds

Conducted and provided by Renault's press office

Q. Pat, how do you look back over the 2006 season?

Pat Symonds - Renault's director of engineering: To win a world title is always an honour for the people involved. But to do the same again the following year, with a double championship victory, is an achievement that really deserves recognition. It proves that the previous year's success was in no way lucky. These results are the consequence of a clearly-defined strategy, and unstinting work from the whole team.

Q. How did your approach change from 2005 to 2006?

PS: Our only rivals this year were Ferrari, and they have always enjoyed exceptional reliability. So managing our lead, or going conservative, were never an option. We had to go on the offensive. We knew that the level of performance of the Ferrari was similar to our R26 and that most of the time, the differences came from differing tyre characteristics.

There was no way of knowing, before the race weekend, if we would have the upper hand. And the balance of power between Michelin and Bridgestone could change literally overnight. That meant we needed to be adaptable in our approach.

Q. You have said this season was among the toughest of your career. Why?

PS: First of all, the battle on track was tough. Really tough. Our rivals didn't seem to have any weaknesses, or almost none. We had to seize every little opportunity. And it was a difficult season politically as well. It was hard to come to terms with events like the mass damper affair and Fernando's penalty in Monza.

Q. The team seemed to cope with the pressure though. How did you keep the motivation high?

PS: We worked very hard to keep everybody motivated. We explained the situation to them, and made sure everybody remained confident. They were already world champions, and there was no reason why they could not do it again.

Q. Finally, if you could start the season again, what mistakes would you want to avoid?

PS: With the benefit of hindsight, I would make sure we redesigned the wheel nut mechanism before Budapest, not afterwards! And I would not have changed Fernando's front tyres in China. Those two mistakes cost us two wins. But in terms of our approach, our philosophy and how we went racing this year, I wouldn't change a thing.

Previous article Analysis: all-new Ferrari for Raikkonen
Next article Grapevine: Another setback for Mansell's plans

Top Comments