Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Alonso denies claim that Aston Martin's Hungarian GP upgrade will decide his F1 future

Formula 1
British GP
Alonso denies claim that Aston Martin's Hungarian GP upgrade will decide his F1 future

Dixon to leave Chip Ganassi Racing at end of 2026 IndyCar season

IndyCar
Mid-Ohio
Dixon to leave Chip Ganassi Racing at end of 2026 IndyCar season

Kay back to the top of Autosport National Rankings table

National
Kay back to the top of Autosport National Rankings table

Alonso: Silverstone will be "not fun to drive" with 2026 F1 cars

Formula 1
British GP
Alonso: Silverstone will be "not fun to drive" with 2026 F1 cars

Motorsport UK and BRDC unite to develop young British drivers

National
Motorsport UK and BRDC unite to develop young British drivers

Tsolov or Lawson? Red Bull and Racing Bulls face a tough decision over 2027 F1 line-up

Feature
Formula 1
British GP
Tsolov or Lawson? Red Bull and Racing Bulls face a tough decision over 2027 F1 line-up

F1 drivers to take to Lego minicars at British GP

Formula 1
British GP
F1 drivers to take to Lego minicars at British GP

Gresini signs Mir and Holgado on two-year MotoGP deals

MotoGP
Dutch GP
Gresini signs Mir and Holgado on two-year MotoGP deals

Name doubts over 'F1'

Max Mosley's assertion that "the difference between Bernie and the GPWC is that Bernie has the F1 brand" has been called into question following comments made by a Patent Office spokesman yesterday.

While it has long been assumed that ownership of variations on the term Formula One is controlled by a number of companies controlled by a holding company, SLEC, owned by a group of three banks and Bernie Ecclestone's family trust, this belief has been called into question by the remarks, given to The Daily Telegraph.

Dr Jeremy Philpott, spokesman for the Patent Office, noted that Formula 1 refers to "a type of motor sport, rather than applying to goods or services coming from a specific individual or legal entity." With the term also used for triathlon and power boat events he noted that "the marks are in common parlance, and insufficiently associated with a single provider of goods and services, [which] may act as a problem for registration."

Trademark records have revealed that Formula One Licensing (FOL), SLEC's intellectual property division, has no pan-European registrations for the terms 'Formula One', 'F1' or 'Formula 1' in the category covering sporting and cultural events, and Philpott suggested that either Ecclestone or the GPWC would be entitled to use the terms in any future series featuring cars in this category.

The commercial rights that SLEC controls are specific to 'The FIA Formula One World Championship' - the company bought these rights for 100 years in 2000 from the Federation Internationale de l'Automobile (FIA) for $360m. This championship is governed by terms agreed between Ecclestone and the teams and laid down as the Concorde Agreement, which is due to expire on December 31, 2007.

Philpott also suggested that SLEC's rights regarding its registered logos are "very enforceable", although registration of a logo does not infer any rights on the text therein. A spokesman for the GPWC noted: "the GPWC is not excluding the possibility of using the Formula One name" in any future motor racing series.

Previous article Analysis: Day of Truth Nears for F1 Teams
Next article GPWC Not Ruling Out Using 'Formula One'

Top Comments