Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Alonso has "no idea" what he’ll do when he eventually retires from F1

Formula 1
British GP
Alonso has "no idea" what he’ll do when he eventually retires from F1

MotoGP German GP: Marquez tops Friday practice as Ducati edges out Aprilia

MotoGP
German GP
MotoGP German GP: Marquez tops Friday practice as Ducati edges out Aprilia

What's Racing Bulls doing that Red Bull isn't?

Feature
Formula 1
What's Racing Bulls doing that Red Bull isn't?

F1 drivers and cars at the 2026 Goodwood Festival of Speed

Goodwood Festival of Speed
F1 drivers and cars at the 2026 Goodwood Festival of Speed

Why Williams is still feeling the weight of expectation

Feature
Formula 1
Why Williams is still feeling the weight of expectation

Supercars Townsville: Waters takes second win of the season in Ford 1-2-3-4

Supercars
Townsville 500
Supercars Townsville: Waters takes second win of the season in Ford 1-2-3-4

Audi calls for F1 ADUO rethink amid exploit fears

Formula 1
British GP
Audi calls for F1 ADUO rethink amid exploit fears

Is Red Bull better or worse off one year after Horner's sacking? Our writers have their say

Formula 1
British GP
Is Red Bull better or worse off one year after Horner's sacking? Our writers have their say

Head, Berger Against Engine Changes

Williams' technical director Patrick Head and BMW's boss Gerhard Berger have expressed their disagreement with a proposed change to the engine regulations when the current Concorde Agreement - the document which rules Formula One - expires in 2007.

Williams' technical director Patrick Head and BMW's boss Gerhard Berger have expressed their disagreement with a proposed change to the engine regulations when the current Concorde Agreement - the document which rules Formula One - expires in 2007.

The changes, which would see the engine capacity reduced from 3 to 2.5 litres, had been discussed in the past and were again brought up at last weekend's British Grand Prix.

The move is thought to be aimed at reducing the cost and improve safety, but Williams' Head believes it won't make a difference and added the manufacturers are happy with the current regulations.

"Martin Whitmarsh [McLaren's managing director] suggested a 2.5-litre V6 and part of it was him expressing opinion and some was concern over current engine cost," Head said. "The normally aspirated engines were brought in because turbos were supposed to be too expensive but, in fact, I don't think anyone suggests that these normally aspirated engines even eight or nine years ago were any cheaper than the turbo engines.

"It was a proposal at a technical working group some time ago and it wasn't in any way taken up enthusiastically by the engine suppliers. They said they are happy with the regs as they are now and do not believe that engine power intrinsically is a major factor in the safety of the cars."

Berger, motorsport director of German engine manufacturer BMW, who supply their units to the Williams team, agreed with Head.

"There will be no change until 2007 but, from a driver's point of view, I don't think it would be right to reduce performance," said Berger. "A Formula One car should have the power that we see, I don't think it would be right. I also think it is important that there stays an equality between different factors so that it doesn't become that the aerodynamics or the tyres are a dominating factor.

"For this reason, you need a certain amount of horsepower. If you reduce it to 2.5-litre V6s you would just reduce horsepower and I don't think it would be safer or cheaper."

Previous article 'I was very lucky' says Schumacher
Next article Grapevine: Alonso Linked to Prost Drive in 2002

Top Comments

Latest news