Formula 1 team payments for 2017 revealed

Ferrari will receive the largest share of revenues allocated for Formula 1 teams despite finishing third in the 2016 constructors' championship, Autosport can reveal

Formula 1 team payments for 2017 revealed

At the start of each season, Formula One Management projects revenues from three streams - hosting fees, media rights and other income avenues, such as hospitality and trackside sponsorship.

FOM's 2017 turnover is estimated at $1.83bn, with underlying revenues estimated at $1.38bn.

It then distributes approximately 68% of projected underlying revenues among the qualifying teams.

That figure of $940m is 3.5% down on last year's figure due to anticipated increases in marketing costs in line with FOM owner Liberty's plans, and a reduction in the number of grands prix from 21 to 20.

Revenues are distributed across the 10 teams through nine monthly payments from April, with a final "check" payment - when definitive revenues have been calculated - in March 2018.

The amount each team receives is based on a series of factors, including performance over the course of the season, past success and special agreements.

The table below, sourced by Autosport, details how revenues are distributed.

Projected 2017 Formula 1 payments to teams ($m)

Disbursed over 10 instalments during 2017, in order of payout.

Col 1 Col 2 Total LST CCB Other Total 2016 +/- 2016 Class
Ferrari 36 41 (13%) 77 68 35 - 180 -9% 3
Mercedes 36 61 (19%) 97 - 39 35 171 - 1
Red Bull Racing 36 52 (16%) 88 - 39 35 161 +12% 2
McLaren 36 31 (9%) 67 - 30 - 97 +18% 6
Williams 36 33 (10%) 69 - - 10 79 -9% 5
Force India 36 36 (11%) 72 - - - 72 +7% 4
Toro Rosso 36 23 (7%) 59 - - - 59 +3% 7
Renault 36 16 (5%) 52 - - - 52 -19% 9
Sauber 36 13 (4%) 49 - - - 49 -10% 10
Haas - 19 (6%) 19 - - - 19 - 8
Total 324.5 324.5 649 68 143 80 940 965 (-3.5%)

(Figures rounded off for simplicity)

COL 1 = Payments are based a team's classification over two of the past three years
COL 2 = Payments are based solely on a team's 2016 classification
LST = Long-standing team
CCB = Constructors' championship bonus

Column 1 payments are calculated based on a team's classification over two of the past three years, while Column 2 payments are based solely on a team's 2016 classification with only the top 10 qualifying.

The Column 1 pot is divided equally among all qualifying teams, with each estimated to earn $36m.

Had Manor survived, that figure would have been $32.5m, $1m down on the previous season, but following the outfit's closure, that payment was shared equally with the other nine qualifying teams.

As Haas has only completed one season, it does not qualify for Column 1 payments.

Column 2 is calculated on a sliding scale from first to 10th place with first receiving 19% of the fund, sixth 9% and 10th 4%.

Ferrari, Mercedes, Red Bull and McLaren have agreed separate deals for constructors' championship bonus payments.

Ferrari also receives a long-standing team payment while Williams collects a heritage payment.

Red Bull receives an extra payment for being the first team to sign the current bi-lateral agreement, which runs to 2020, and this totals $35m.

After meeting its agreed target of two world championships, Mercedes earns a special annual payment that matches Red Bull's.

Ferrari will receive $180m, representing almost one fifth of the total 'pot' but $12m less than last year.

That's $108m more than Force India receives, despite the latter finishing just one place adrift in the constructors' championship.

Mercedes won both the drivers' and constructors' championships for the third successive year, but still received $9m less than Ferrari.

Force India and Williams both finished ahead of McLaren in the standings, but each receive less courtesy of McLaren's CCB payment.

If the pot was shared out equally, each team would get $94m. That would leave Ferrari's payment down by $86m while Sauber, the final team to qualify for Column 1 and 2 payments, would receive an extra $45m.

Autosport contacted FOM, which refused to comment on the revenues.

shares
comments
Why Button's F1 return is confusing

Previous article

Why Button's F1 return is confusing

Next article

Mercedes F1 team has 'no magic bullets' for Hamilton's Sochi woes

Mercedes F1 team has 'no magic bullets' for Hamilton's Sochi woes
Load comments
The 'surprise' Mercedes time that puts F1's victory fight back on a knife-edge in France Plus

The 'surprise' Mercedes time that puts F1's victory fight back on a knife-edge in France

Red Bull led the way after the first two practice sessions for the 2021 French Grand Prix, but only just ahead of Mercedes. There was all the usual practice skulduggery complicating the performance picture, but one aspect seen at the world champion squad gave it a ‘surprise’ lift, as it looks to leave its street-circuit struggles firmly in the past

How Ferrari got its F1 recovery plan working Plus

How Ferrari got its F1 recovery plan working

After its worst campaign in 40 years, the famous Italian team had to bounce back in 2021 – and it appears to be delivering. Although it concedes the pole positions in Monaco and Baku paint a somewhat misleading picture of its competitiveness, the team is heading into the 2022 rules revamp on much stronger footing to go for wins again

The joy that exposes F1’s key weakness Plus

The joy that exposes F1’s key weakness

Long-awaited wins for ex-Formula 1 drivers Marcus Ericsson and Kevin Magnussen in IndyCar and IMSA last weekend gave F1 a reminder of what it is missing. But with the new rules aimed at levelling the playing field, there’s renewed optimism that more drivers can have a rewarding result when their day of days comes

Formula 1
Jun 17, 2021
The figures Red Bull and Mercedes can't afford to see again in F1 2021 Plus

The figures Red Bull and Mercedes can't afford to see again in F1 2021

OPINION: An interloper squad got amongst the title contenders during Formula 1’s street-circuit mini-break, where Red Bull left with the points lead in both championships. But, as the campaign heads back to purpose-built venues once again, how the drivers of the two top teams compare in one crucial area will be a major factor in deciding which squad stays in or retakes the top spot

Formula 1
Jun 16, 2021
Why Alfa's boss is ready for the task of securing a stronger F1 future Plus

Why Alfa's boss is ready for the task of securing a stronger F1 future

Two tenth places in recent races have lifted Alfa Romeo to the head of Formula 1's 'Class C' battle in 2021, but longer-term the Swiss-based squad has far loftier ambitions. With the new 2022 rules set to level out the playing field, team boss Frederic Vasseur has good reason to be optimistic, as he explained to Autosport in an exclusive interview

Formula 1
Jun 15, 2021
How Barnard’s revolutionary McLaren transformed F1 car construction Plus

How Barnard’s revolutionary McLaren transformed F1 car construction

The MP4/1 was pioneering by choice, but a McLaren by chance. STUART CODLING relates the tangled (carbonfibre) weaves which led to the creation of one of motor racing’s defining cars

Formula 1
Jun 15, 2021
Why the end is nigh for F1’s most dependable design tool Plus

Why the end is nigh for F1’s most dependable design tool

Windtunnel work forms the bedrock of aerodynamic development in Formula 1. But as PAT SYMONDS explains, advances in virtual research are signalling the end of these expensive and complicated relics

Formula 1
Jun 13, 2021
Why polarising Mosley’s legacy amounts to far more than tabloid rumour Plus

Why polarising Mosley’s legacy amounts to far more than tabloid rumour

The newspapers, naturally, lingered over Max Mosley’s tainted family history and niche sexual practices. But this is to trivialise the legacy of a big beast of motor racing politics. STUART CODLING weighs the life of a man whose work for safety on both road and track has saved hundreds of thousands of lives, but whose penchant for cruelty remains problematic and polarising

Formula 1
Jun 12, 2021