Ex-Caterham F1 boss Fernandes denies wrongdoing in Airbus bribery case

Former Caterham Formula 1 team boss Tony Fernandes has denied any wrongdoing in relation to a bribery scandal involving aircraft maker Airbus

Ex-Caterham F1 boss Fernandes denies wrongdoing in Airbus bribery case

AirAsia, the company co-founded and run by Fernandes, is one of several airlines named in the case brought against Airbus by the UK's Serious Fraud Office.

A worldwide investigation was shared between British, US and French authorities, with the SFO taking responsibility for Malaysia, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Indonesia and Ghana.

It has resulted in Airbus facing more than €3.5billion in fines and penalties via settlement agreements.

A sponsorship deal between Airbus parent company EADS and Caterham is alleged to have influenced AirAsia's decision to order the company's planes. The Malaysian airline only uses Airbus products.

Details of the case were revealed in an approved judgement issued on Friday by Dame Victoria Sharp, president of the Queen's Bench Division of the Royal Courts of Justice.

In it she wrote: "The first count alleges that contrary to section 7 of the Bribery Act 2010, between 1 July 2011 and 1 June 2015, Airbus SE failed to prevent persons associated with Airbus SE from bribing others concerned with the purchase of aircraft by AirAsia and AirAsia X airlines from Airbus, namely directors and/or employees of AirAsia airlines where the said bribery was intended to obtain or retain business or advantage in the conduct of business for Airbus SE."

She added in relation to Caterham: "The improper payment consisted of $50million [and Airbus employees also offered but did not pay an additional $55m] paid to directors and/or employees of AirAsia and AirAsia X airlines as sponsorship for a sports team.

"The sports team was jointly owned by AirAsia Executive 1 and AirAsia Executive 2 but was legally unrelated to AirAsia and AirAsia X."

In a statement released on Monday, AirAsia said it "vigorously rejects and denies any and all allegations of wrongdoing".

AirAsia also confirmed that CEO Fernandes and executive chairman Datuk Kamarudin bin Meranun have stepped aside from their roles for two months while an investigation is completed.

They will remain as advisors, with no executive authority.

Regarding this step, the company said "the main objective will be to review the allegations therein so far as it concerns [AirAsia], and to take any necessary action based on the review".

It added: "The involvement of Airbus in the sponsorship of the sports team was a well-known and widely publicised matter bringing branding and other benefits to Airbus.

"AirAsia's own sponsorship of the sports team went through due internal assessment and approvals before being considered and approved by the board."

In a separate statement, Fernandes and Kamarudin denied any impropriety in relation to the Caterham sponsorship deal, also stressing it was highly publicised at the time.

They said that they "categorically deny any and all allegations of wrongdoing or misconduct on our part as directors of AirAsia.

We would not harm the very companies that we spent our entire lives building up to their present global status".

They added: "Caterham F1, the company alleged to have been sponsored improperly by Airbus, was at the relevant time a Formula 1 racing team that had gone round the globe promoting amongst others AirAsia, AirAsia X, GE and Airbus.

"Throughout the period we were shareholders in Caterham, the company made no profit and was eventually disposed of for [£1] in 2014.

"From start to finish, this was a branding exercise and not a venture to make profit."

shares
comments

Inside Ocon's first day at Renault

Ricciardo: Drive to Survive helped 'put F1 on the map' in the US

Ranking the top 10 pre-war grand prix drivers

Ranking the top 10 pre-war grand prix drivers

Plus
Plus
Formula 1
Kevin Turner

Ranking the top 10 pre-war grand prix drivers Ranking the top 10 pre-war grand prix drivers

Why drivers are the least of Ferrari’s F1 worries

Why drivers are the least of Ferrari’s F1 worries

Plus
Plus
Formula 1
GP Racing

Why drivers are the least of Ferrari’s F1 worries Why drivers are the least of Ferrari’s F1 worries

How Vasseur has begun Ferrari’s mission to keep Leclerc on side

How Vasseur has begun Ferrari’s mission to keep Leclerc on side

Plus
Plus
Formula 1
GP Racing

How Vasseur has begun Ferrari’s mission to keep Leclerc on side How Vasseur has begun Ferrari’s mission to keep Leclerc on side

Why Red Bull’s biggest F1 adversary is now itself

Why Red Bull’s biggest F1 adversary is now itself

Plus
Plus
Formula 1
Saudi Arabian GP
Jonathan Noble

Why Red Bull’s biggest F1 adversary is now itself Why Red Bull’s biggest F1 adversary is now itself

How "only tough" Tost's public lack of trust could hurt AlphaTauri

How "only tough" Tost's public lack of trust could hurt AlphaTauri

Plus
Plus
Formula 1
Saudi Arabian GP
Jake Boxall-Legge

How "only tough" Tost's public lack of trust could hurt AlphaTauri How "only tough" Tost's public lack of trust could hurt AlphaTauri

What Perez's Jeddah joy means for F1’s 2023 hopes for a real title fight

What Perez's Jeddah joy means for F1’s 2023 hopes for a real title fight

Plus
Plus
Formula 1
Saudi Arabian GP
Alex Kalinauckas

What Perez's Jeddah joy means for F1’s 2023 hopes for a real title fight What Perez's Jeddah joy means for F1’s 2023 hopes for a real title fight

Saudi Arabian Grand Prix Driver Ratings 2023

Saudi Arabian Grand Prix Driver Ratings 2023

Plus
Plus
Formula 1
Saudi Arabian GP
Alex Kalinauckas

Saudi Arabian Grand Prix Driver Ratings 2023 Saudi Arabian Grand Prix Driver Ratings 2023

How Perez kept Verstappen’s Saudi Arabian GP surge at bay

How Perez kept Verstappen’s Saudi Arabian GP surge at bay

Plus
Plus
Formula 1
Saudi Arabian GP
Jake Boxall-Legge

How Perez kept Verstappen’s Saudi Arabian GP surge at bay How Perez kept Verstappen’s Saudi Arabian GP surge at bay