Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

It’s not overtaking, it’s “avoiding action" - why Alonso says F1 lost a full decade of “pure racing”

Formula 1
Canadian GP
It’s not overtaking, it’s “avoiding action" - why Alonso says F1 lost a full decade of “pure racing”

Williams signs key leaders from McLaren, Mercedes, Alpine

Formula 1
Canadian GP
Williams signs key leaders from McLaren, Mercedes, Alpine

Behind the scenes at Pirelli: The hidden factors that go into developing F1 tyres

Feature
Formula 1
Behind the scenes at Pirelli: The hidden factors that go into developing F1 tyres

Alex Marquez to miss next two MotoGP rounds after Barcelona crash

MotoGP
Barcelona Official Testing
Alex Marquez to miss next two MotoGP rounds after Barcelona crash

How Hamilton switched to a "different approach" for F1 Canadian GP

Formula 1
Canadian GP
How Hamilton switched to a "different approach" for F1 Canadian GP

Where you can find the best battles of F1 2026

Feature
Formula 1
Where you can find the best battles of F1 2026

Red Bull outlines timeline for new F1 wind tunnel

Formula 1
Canadian GP
Red Bull outlines timeline for new F1 wind tunnel

Monster to become Aprilia's title sponsor in MotoGP from Italian GP

MotoGP
Monster to become Aprilia's title sponsor in MotoGP from Italian GP

Banks Claim First Blood in Ecclestone Legal Bout

Formula One's shareholder banks drew first blood on Friday in a legal battle with commercial supremo Bernie Ecclestone for control of the sport.

Formula One's shareholder banks drew first blood on Friday in a legal battle with commercial supremo Bernie Ecclestone for control of the sport.

An appeal court judge dismissed an appeal on behalf of Ecclestone's Formula One Holdings Ltd (FOH) and Bambino Holdings Ltd for a dispute with the banks to be heard under Swiss law rather than British.

Leave to appeal was refused, with the main case scheduled to be heard in London this month.

Lord Justice Carnwath upheld a decision that the case should be heard in Britain and stated that the alternative, to wait for a ruling in a Geneva court, would serve "no purpose but to increase delay and expense".

Although Friday's judgment concerned the narrow issue of jursidiction, the underlying dispute has major implications for the sport.

"The overall dispute concerns the control and future of Formula One racing," the judge declared in his written judgment.

The banks - Bayerische Landesbank, JP Morgan and Lehman Brothers - control 75 percent of the SLEC holding company that owns the commercial rights to Formula One. The other 25 percent is owned by Bambino Holdings, an Ecclestone family trust.

SLEC also owns FOH but the banks are contesting the appointment of that company's directors, arguing that although they own the majority of the shares they do not have control because of the board's composition.

The banks acquired their stake in Formula One after Germany's Kirch media empire collapsed, owing them $1.6 billion. Ultimate victory for the banks would weaken Ecclestone's decades-long grip on the billion-dollar sport.

The case is being closely watched by major carmakers who have threatened to set up their own 'rival' series from 2008 via GPWC Holdings. A GPWC spokesman said on Friday the carmakers and their recently appointed sports marketing consultants were pressing on with their plans.

Previous article BMW boss disputes Ferrari claims
Next article Ecclestone set for F1 showdown

Top Comments