Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

History repeats as 70th anniversary of Mallory Park is celebrated

National
History repeats as 70th anniversary of Mallory Park is celebrated

How Sutton's BTCC steamroller overcame Snetterton challenges

Feature
BTCC
Snetterton (300 Circuit)
How Sutton's BTCC steamroller overcame Snetterton challenges

Rossi faces key decision: Who will replace di Giannantonio at VR46?

MotoGP
Catalan GP
Rossi faces key decision: Who will replace di Giannantonio at VR46?

Red Bull reacts to Verstappen’s criticism – why ‘I told you’ moments are needed

Formula 1
Canadian GP
Red Bull reacts to Verstappen’s criticism – why ‘I told you’ moments are needed

Mini miracles as remarkable podium stories play out at Snetterton

National
Mini miracles as remarkable podium stories play out at Snetterton

Why Russell doesn’t want to see the 2026 F1 rules changed

Formula 1
Canadian GP
Why Russell doesn’t want to see the 2026 F1 rules changed

How Rosenqvist came of age in the closest Indy 500 finish in history

Feature
IndyCar
110th Running of the Indianapolis 500
How Rosenqvist came of age in the closest Indy 500 finish in history

Why "awesome" Canadian GP has convinced Hamilton he's "probably better without" Ferrari simulator

Formula 1
Canadian GP
Why "awesome" Canadian GP has convinced Hamilton he's "probably better without" Ferrari simulator

Australian GP: Are F1's hands tied over the latest halo irritation?

The interference of the halo in on-board camera shots from Formula 1 cars was met with a negative reaction by TV viewers and those in the Melbourne paddock

But the F1 organisation is limited on what it can do to improve the situation with available camera housing points.

FIA technical regulations state that "All cars must be equipped with four positions in which cameras or camera housings can be fitted."

All 20 cars are currently obliged to carry a camera for the overhead shot from the top of the airbox.

The fitting of cameras in the other positions - either side of the airbox, in the mirrors and on either the side of the nose - varies from car to car, and is decided by the F1 organisation on a race to race basis.

While some camera shots were seen when teams tested the Halo in FP1 sessions over the past couple of seasons, Friday's practice sessions in Australia represented the first real opportunity to see extensive running involving the definitive halo on a range of cars.

Most observers believe that the traditional main overhead shot that is available from all 20 cars is still acceptable, and while the halo appears, it does not cause too much disruption.

The bigger issue was with the optional "chassis shot", provided by cameras mounted alongside the airbox, which provide a view over the driver's shoulder that is now almost completely obscured by the halo.

"One thing that strikes me is that a good 50% of the useful screen is black," said Force India chief operating officer Otmar Szafnauer.

"It's early days. I'm sure with feedback we'll think of clever ways to do it."

F1 sources acknowledge that the organisation has some work to do to hone its coverage, but the challenge is that it is limited to the camera positions that are mandated in the regulations.

The rules also states "Competitors must be notified of any changes to the camera or transponder installation instructions before 30 June of the previous season."

This ensures that there can be no changes to mounting positions within this season - and that any planned modifications for 2019 will have to be agreed and confirmed by that date.

In the interim, F1 can now play around with its usage of the existing camera mounting points, some of which have previously been employed relatively sparingly.

With the now compromised forward chassis shot likely to be phased out, more emphasis can be put on nose cameras, and chassis mounting points can be used instead for a reverse view.

Meanwhile F1 can work on revising the location of camera housing points for 2019 in time to meet the June 30 deadline.

"We don't want to have shots that aren't interesting or exciting," an F1 insider told Autosport.

"Our model is to evolve shots that are entertaining. But we're not going to make a knee-jerk reaction."

Previous article 10 things we've learned from Melbourne so far
Next article Video: How Ferrari's 2018 F1 car differs from its predecessor

Top Comments