Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

MotoGP British GP: Bezzecchi leads Aprilia domination in Friday practice

MotoGP
British GP
MotoGP British GP: Bezzecchi leads Aprilia domination in Friday practice

FIA wants F1 cars to lose another 80kg under next rules overhaul

Formula 1
FIA wants F1 cars to lose another 80kg under next rules overhaul

KTM allowed to fix faulty MotoGP engine after U-turn from rivals

MotoGP
British GP
KTM allowed to fix faulty MotoGP engine after U-turn from rivals

How a Le Mans winner is changing the game for female racing in Japan

Feature
Super Formula
Sugo
How a Le Mans winner is changing the game for female racing in Japan

How the revised WEC 2026 calendar impacts title fight

WEC
How the revised WEC 2026 calendar impacts title fight

How F1 learned to grow without growing

Feature
Formula 1
How F1 learned to grow without growing

Clark, Senna, Antonelli – How the grand chelem age record has evolved

Formula 1
Clark, Senna, Antonelli – How the grand chelem age record has evolved

Why Aston Martin is a better destination on the F1 driver market than it seems

Feature
Formula 1
Why Aston Martin is a better destination on the F1 driver market than it seems

Head, Berger Against Engine Changes

Williams' technical director Patrick Head and BMW's boss Gerhard Berger have expressed their disagreement with a proposed change to the engine regulations when the current Concorde Agreement - the document which rules Formula One - expires in 2007.

Williams' technical director Patrick Head and BMW's boss Gerhard Berger have expressed their disagreement with a proposed change to the engine regulations when the current Concorde Agreement - the document which rules Formula One - expires in 2007.

The changes, which would see the engine capacity reduced from 3 to 2.5 litres, had been discussed in the past and were again brought up at last weekend's British Grand Prix.

The move is thought to be aimed at reducing the cost and improve safety, but Williams' Head believes it won't make a difference and added the manufacturers are happy with the current regulations.

"Martin Whitmarsh [McLaren's managing director] suggested a 2.5-litre V6 and part of it was him expressing opinion and some was concern over current engine cost," Head said. "The normally aspirated engines were brought in because turbos were supposed to be too expensive but, in fact, I don't think anyone suggests that these normally aspirated engines even eight or nine years ago were any cheaper than the turbo engines.

"It was a proposal at a technical working group some time ago and it wasn't in any way taken up enthusiastically by the engine suppliers. They said they are happy with the regs as they are now and do not believe that engine power intrinsically is a major factor in the safety of the cars."

Berger, motorsport director of German engine manufacturer BMW, who supply their units to the Williams team, agreed with Head.

"There will be no change until 2007 but, from a driver's point of view, I don't think it would be right to reduce performance," said Berger. "A Formula One car should have the power that we see, I don't think it would be right. I also think it is important that there stays an equality between different factors so that it doesn't become that the aerodynamics or the tyres are a dominating factor.

"For this reason, you need a certain amount of horsepower. If you reduce it to 2.5-litre V6s you would just reduce horsepower and I don't think it would be safer or cheaper."

Previous article 'I was very lucky' says Schumacher
Next article Grapevine: Alonso Linked to Prost Drive in 2002

Top Comments

Latest news