Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Why Aston Martin is a better destination on the F1 driver market than it seems

Feature
Formula 1
Why Aston Martin is a better destination on the F1 driver market than it seems

What is it like being a Williams F1 simulator driver?

Formula 1
What is it like being a Williams F1 simulator driver?

Marquez expects rivals to risk more in hunt for MotoGP title

MotoGP
British GP
Marquez expects rivals to risk more in hunt for MotoGP title

MotoGP title challenger Bezzecchi pessimistic for British GP

MotoGP
British GP
MotoGP title challenger Bezzecchi pessimistic for British GP

The rising Japanese star with his sights set firmly on IndyCar

Feature
Super Formula
Sugo
The rising Japanese star with his sights set firmly on IndyCar

WRC drivers split on whether Rally Finland was "too fast" after several crashes

WRC
Rally Finland
WRC drivers split on whether Rally Finland was "too fast" after several crashes

Silverstone to continue hosting MotoGP's British GP after new deal

MotoGP
British GP
Silverstone to continue hosting MotoGP's British GP after new deal

Should the algorithms in F1 power units be banned? FIA explains why it won’t work

Formula 1
Should the algorithms in F1 power units be banned? FIA explains why it won’t work

Banks Claim First Blood in Ecclestone Legal Bout

Formula One's shareholder banks drew first blood on Friday in a legal battle with commercial supremo Bernie Ecclestone for control of the sport.

Formula One's shareholder banks drew first blood on Friday in a legal battle with commercial supremo Bernie Ecclestone for control of the sport.

An appeal court judge dismissed an appeal on behalf of Ecclestone's Formula One Holdings Ltd (FOH) and Bambino Holdings Ltd for a dispute with the banks to be heard under Swiss law rather than British.

Leave to appeal was refused, with the main case scheduled to be heard in London this month.

Lord Justice Carnwath upheld a decision that the case should be heard in Britain and stated that the alternative, to wait for a ruling in a Geneva court, would serve "no purpose but to increase delay and expense".

Although Friday's judgment concerned the narrow issue of jursidiction, the underlying dispute has major implications for the sport.

"The overall dispute concerns the control and future of Formula One racing," the judge declared in his written judgment.

The banks - Bayerische Landesbank, JP Morgan and Lehman Brothers - control 75 percent of the SLEC holding company that owns the commercial rights to Formula One. The other 25 percent is owned by Bambino Holdings, an Ecclestone family trust.

SLEC also owns FOH but the banks are contesting the appointment of that company's directors, arguing that although they own the majority of the shares they do not have control because of the board's composition.

The banks acquired their stake in Formula One after Germany's Kirch media empire collapsed, owing them $1.6 billion. Ultimate victory for the banks would weaken Ecclestone's decades-long grip on the billion-dollar sport.

The case is being closely watched by major carmakers who have threatened to set up their own 'rival' series from 2008 via GPWC Holdings. A GPWC spokesman said on Friday the carmakers and their recently appointed sports marketing consultants were pressing on with their plans.

Previous article BMW boss disputes Ferrari claims
Next article Ecclestone set for F1 showdown

Top Comments