Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Silverstone to continue hosting MotoGP's British GP after new deal

MotoGP
British GP
Silverstone to continue hosting MotoGP's British GP after new deal

Should the algorithms in F1 power units be banned? FIA explains why it won’t work

Formula 1
Should the algorithms in F1 power units be banned? FIA explains why it won’t work

Mercedes "closely monitoring" upgrades for the rest of F1 2026

Formula 1
Belgian GP
Mercedes "closely monitoring" upgrades for the rest of F1 2026

How the McLaren MP4/8B's engine blow-up changed F1 history

Feature
Formula 1
How the McLaren MP4/8B's engine blow-up changed F1 history

The novelty of Cadillac is starting to wear off - but that's a compliment

Feature
Formula 1
The novelty of Cadillac is starting to wear off - but that's a compliment

Is the MP4/8B McLaren’s greatest what-might-have-been?

Feature
Formula 1
Is the MP4/8B McLaren’s greatest what-might-have-been?

Rovanpera set for Toyota talks to discuss motorsport future

WRC
Rally Finland
Rovanpera set for Toyota talks to discuss motorsport future

Top five roles on Motorsport Jobs this week

General
Top five roles on Motorsport Jobs this week

Q & A with Renault's Pat Symonds

Conducted and provided by Renault's press office

Q. Pat, looking at the list of fastest laps, Montoya's best was eight tenths quicker than Fernando. Is that a worry?

PS: We are certainly concerned about McLaren's pace. Yesterday, we had a good balance on the cars and no specific problem, but there was a 0.8s gap to Montoya on similar fuel loads. We are not sure why, but our absolute performance was not too good yesterday.

Q. Even so, Fernando and Giancarlo finished second and fourth...

PS: I think the result showed all the strengths of the team. We recognised the potential problems we might have last weekend, reacted to them, and made the absolute best of the situation.

Q. You ran an unusual race strategy...

PS: Yes, we almost ran the race backwards: we did a short first stint, followed by two longer ones, and it was absolutely the right thing to do. Had we fuelled to lap 20 with our starting slots in qualifying, we would have been further back on the grid - and the race would have become much more complicated...

Q. What about the next race in Monza - will the status quo continue?

PS: Monza is a real one-off race - completely different to anything else during the season. During recent years, we have run some great races there without a powerful engine. With the RS25, the engine situation is much closer - so I think it could be quite good for us.

Q. But the performance gap remains -" what developments have you got coming?

PS: Looking in order, Monza is a one-off race and Spa the type of circuit where McLaren are likely to be quicker than us. But we have a big aerodynamic update in Brazil, and engine development is ongoing: every fresh engine contains extra performance developments.

Q. Does yesterday's race show the value of an aggressive approach as the season comes to an end?

PS: I think it demonstrates that the best form of defence is attack. That was the lesson we took from Hungary: it showed us we needed to be adaptable, and to try and take the fight to McLaren. This weekend, we did that and it worked: Montoya was under pressure from Fernando two laps from the end, and he made a mistake. We got the best possible result from the weekend - and that was very satisfying.

Previous article Ferrari: Massa could Stay Long
Next article Jordan Plan Monza Debut for Revised Car

Top Comments