Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Why Aston Martin is a better destination on the F1 driver market than it seems

Feature
Formula 1
Why Aston Martin is a better destination on the F1 driver market than it seems

What is it like being a Williams F1 simulator driver?

Formula 1
What is it like being a Williams F1 simulator driver?

Marquez expects rivals to risk more in hunt for MotoGP title

MotoGP
British GP
Marquez expects rivals to risk more in hunt for MotoGP title

MotoGP title challenger Bezzecchi pessimistic for British GP

MotoGP
British GP
MotoGP title challenger Bezzecchi pessimistic for British GP

The rising Japanese star with his sights set firmly on IndyCar

Feature
Super Formula
Sugo
The rising Japanese star with his sights set firmly on IndyCar

WRC drivers split on whether Rally Finland was "too fast" after several crashes

WRC
Rally Finland
WRC drivers split on whether Rally Finland was "too fast" after several crashes

Silverstone to continue hosting MotoGP's British GP after new deal

MotoGP
British GP
Silverstone to continue hosting MotoGP's British GP after new deal

Should the algorithms in F1 power units be banned? FIA explains why it won’t work

Formula 1
Should the algorithms in F1 power units be banned? FIA explains why it won’t work

Jag boss optimistic over future

Jaguar Racing team principal Tony Purnell is hopeful that the team can generate additional funding to guarantee the long-term future of the Ford-owned Formula 1 team

Jaguar entered Formula 1 in 2000 and, after three tough and relatively unsuccessful years riddled by a lack of cohesive management structure, faced a crucial moment two years ago when it was widely anticipated that Ford management in the USA was about to pull the plug.

Similar rumours exist once again in the F1 paddock, with the word that Ford has delayed approval of the 2005 programme until there are assurances of additional sponsorship revenue.

Purnell explained recently that work on next year's R6 had been interrupted by indecision on the '05 rule changes, with front wing changes meaning that considerable R&D work was no longer valid. Others, however, have suggested that there are more fundamental reasons.

Purnell said in Hungary: "I think you'll find Ford is doing okay and when they decided to stick with this two years ago, it could not have been a worse time. They were facing meltdown and now they've recovered quite well. And, tell me if I'm wrong, but I think generally, the way this team is run now, is admired."

He admitted, however, that he could not give cast-iron assurances that the team would be on the grid next year. As for the prospect of generating additional sponsorship revenue, however, he was positive, despite the expected loss of HSBC at the end of the year.

Previous article Sato puts Button in shade
Next article Williams sacrifices qual speed

Top Comments