Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Why Aston Martin is a better destination on the F1 driver market than it seems

Feature
Formula 1
Why Aston Martin is a better destination on the F1 driver market than it seems

What is it like being a Williams F1 simulator driver?

Formula 1
What is it like being a Williams F1 simulator driver?

Marquez expects rivals to risk more in hunt for MotoGP title

MotoGP
British GP
Marquez expects rivals to risk more in hunt for MotoGP title

MotoGP title challenger Bezzecchi pessimistic for British GP

MotoGP
British GP
MotoGP title challenger Bezzecchi pessimistic for British GP

The rising Japanese star with his sights set firmly on IndyCar

Feature
Super Formula
Sugo
The rising Japanese star with his sights set firmly on IndyCar

WRC drivers split on whether Rally Finland was "too fast" after several crashes

WRC
Rally Finland
WRC drivers split on whether Rally Finland was "too fast" after several crashes

Silverstone to continue hosting MotoGP's British GP after new deal

MotoGP
British GP
Silverstone to continue hosting MotoGP's British GP after new deal

Should the algorithms in F1 power units be banned? FIA explains why it won’t work

Formula 1
Should the algorithms in F1 power units be banned? FIA explains why it won’t work

Team chiefs debate impact of '03 rules

At Suzuka, leading team figures were asked their opinion on Formula 1's success in 2003 and whether it was down to the FIA rule changes or other more general factors, prompting some interesting debate

Toyota team principal Ove Andersson said: "It's a very difficult question to answer. Generally speaking, I believe that the championship, due to the new qualifying regulations - doing qualifying with fuel - has mixed up the grid and has been making races very interesting. So probably the rule changes have had a big influence."

Williams technical director Patrick Head, meanwhile, argued: "I think the main influence has been that there have been three and sometimes four teams running competitively and that wasn't the case. We were able to qualify well last year but we weren't able to sustain that. The degradation of our tyres was much worse than with the Ferrari, and so we were promising only to deceive in reality.

"But now there are three, sometimes four competitive teams, because the Renault is probably competitive at every circuit now. Certainly its engine no longer seems to be as far behind as it was at the beginning of the season. Last year, the Ferrari was just head and shoulders above the other cars and however you mixed up the regulations you were still going to get a similar outcome."

Head's opposite number at BAR, Geoff Willis, added: "Probably we've seen more varied effects of the tyre battle this year. There hasn't been such a consistent benefit one way or the other and it has depended on circuits and on conditions. And also, yes, there are more teams competing at a close to equal level technically so I think that's mixed it up. I personally don't think the qualifying has made any real difference to the outcome of the championship."

Previous article Schuey and Williams top of the pops
Next article Saturday First Free Practice - Japanese GP

Top Comments