Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Why Aston Martin is a better destination on the F1 driver market than it seems

Feature
Formula 1
Why Aston Martin is a better destination on the F1 driver market than it seems

What is it like being a Williams F1 simulator driver?

Formula 1
What is it like being a Williams F1 simulator driver?

Marquez expects rivals to risk more in hunt for MotoGP title

MotoGP
British GP
Marquez expects rivals to risk more in hunt for MotoGP title

MotoGP title challenger Bezzecchi pessimistic for British GP

MotoGP
British GP
MotoGP title challenger Bezzecchi pessimistic for British GP

The rising Japanese star with his sights set firmly on IndyCar

Feature
Super Formula
Sugo
The rising Japanese star with his sights set firmly on IndyCar

WRC drivers split on whether Rally Finland was "too fast" after several crashes

WRC
Rally Finland
WRC drivers split on whether Rally Finland was "too fast" after several crashes

Silverstone to continue hosting MotoGP's British GP after new deal

MotoGP
British GP
Silverstone to continue hosting MotoGP's British GP after new deal

Should the algorithms in F1 power units be banned? FIA explains why it won’t work

Formula 1
Should the algorithms in F1 power units be banned? FIA explains why it won’t work

Michelin: Two stops are the way to go

Teams at Indianapolis are likely to go for two pit stops on Sunday's Grand Prix. That's the view of Michelin's F1 programme manager Pascal Vasselon.

"A two-stop strategy will probably be the favoured strategy here, given that the fuel weight penalty is relatively slight - less than 0.3 seconds per lap for every extra 10kg. Pit stops are also relatively swift, with a pit visit taking about 28 seconds."

Vasselon also highlighted yet another way in which Indianapolis is a track of two halves. In addition to the obvious differences between the infield and the banking, and the aerodynamic set-up compromise this requires, there is also the surface to consider.

"The surface on the banking is very abrasive. The infield, on the other hand, is fairly smooth. That is the most significant contrast between the two different parts of the track."

Michelin motorsport director Pierre Dupasquier added that, rather like its partner McLaren, Monza was a good showing considering it was not a suitable track for Michelins.

"We knew the previous race in Monza would place a greater emphasis on aerodynamics than on the relationship between a chassis and its tyres. In circumstances that perhaps favoured our main rival our partners proved to be extremely competitive.

"We're aiming to use cutting-edge tyre technology at Indianapolis to help our partners overcome the aerodynamic dilemma."

Michelin will be bringing similar tyres to those used at Monza. They'll be based on the new constructions developed during the tyres controversy in the Italian Grand Prix build-up.

Previous article Indianapolis Will be a Thriller, Says Schumacher
Next article Ask Nigel Roebuck: September 24

Top Comments