Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Tsolov or Lawson? Red Bull and Racing Bulls face a tough decision over 2027 F1 line-up

Feature
Formula 1
British GP
Tsolov or Lawson? Red Bull and Racing Bulls face a tough decision over 2027 F1 line-up

F1 drivers to take to Lego minicars at British GP

Formula 1
British GP
F1 drivers to take to Lego minicars at British GP

Gresini signs Mir and Holgado on two-year MotoGP deals

MotoGP
Dutch GP
Gresini signs Mir and Holgado on two-year MotoGP deals

Why this looks like Russell’s best chance yet at the British GP

Feature
Formula 1
British GP
Why this looks like Russell’s best chance yet at the British GP

Vote: Autosport Best of the Month for June 2026

General
Vote: Autosport Best of the Month for June 2026

Why similar Williams and Aston Martin failures are oddly reassuring

Feature
Formula 1
Austrian GP
Why similar Williams and Aston Martin failures are oddly reassuring

McLaren still to investigate why it's losing to Mercedes on the straights, despite same PU

Formula 1
Austrian GP
McLaren still to investigate why it's losing to Mercedes on the straights, despite same PU

Explained: The factors behind WRC’s big 2027 transition and the hurdles it still faces

Feature
WRC
Rally Greece
Explained: The factors behind WRC’s big 2027 transition and the hurdles it still faces

McLaren wants F1 regulations tightened to prevent further car copying

McLaren Formula 1 chief Andreas Seidl is eager for the regulations to be tightened to limit the extent to which teams can copy other cars

The FIA is currently reviewing a protest from Renault over the legality over Racing Point's RP20 car, which was based on the design of the 2019 title-winning Mercedes W10.

Racing Point has openly admitted it used pictures of the Mercedes to design its car for this year, but stressed it did so entirely within the regulations and has no concerns over Renault's protest.

Seidl previously said there were "no grounds" for a protest against Racing Point, but that the case was important for F1's future as it risked becoming a "copying championship".

While Seidl accepted there had always been a degree of copying in F1, he said the current regulations allowed the practice to go beyond simply looking at pictures of another car.

"There's obviously copying [which] is not just copying," Seidl said.

"There's copying which has always been around in Formula 1, and which is part of Formula 1.

"We have tried to analyse what competitors are doing by pictures that are publicly available, pictures you can take in the pit lane or on-track. I think no-one has any problem with copying parts or cars from these pictures.

"What is more important is to simply clarify and maybe also change the regulations on what can be done in terms of copying beyond this copying, where you only use publicly-available information.

"There's room in the regulations at the moment that you can do actually a lot more, that you can do co-operations on wind tunnel technology, on the way you use the wind tunnel, on the way how you map your car in the wind tunnel.

"Also in the way how you get access to pictures of cars, and so on.

"I think that's something that needs to be clarified, that we have a clear direction on what Formula 1 wants to allow there in the future."

PLUS: Why F1 has always been a "copying championship"

Renault's protest against Racing Point has centred on the brake ducts of the RP20 car. Last year, Racing Point were supplied brake ducts by Mercedes as they were a listed part, but they no longer are for 2020.

Renault has also stressed that its protest is not about brake ducts, but about defining the future of F1 and the degree of collaboration permitted between teams.

Seidl said that remained the "key question" McLaren also wanted answering in this case.

"It's not necessarily about doing something legal or illegal," Seidl said.

"As I said many times, there is room in the regulations to do a lot more than just take pictures in the pit lane.

"That's why we think it's important to have these clarifications now."

Previous article Monza confirms F1 Italian GP to take place without fans
Next article How Red Bull's task to beat Mercedes just got harder

Top Comments

Latest news