Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

'This is not F1 on two wheels' - Ezpeleta on investment and evolution in MotoGP

MotoGP
British GP
'This is not F1 on two wheels' - Ezpeleta on investment and evolution in MotoGP

Could McLaren follow Red Bull’s path with its own F1 engine – and should it?

Feature
Formula 1
Dutch GP
Could McLaren follow Red Bull’s path with its own F1 engine – and should it?

The Radical rise of a top prototype squad

Feature
National
The Radical rise of a top prototype squad

The subtle but significant changes McLaren will make for its 2027 F1 car

Feature
Formula 1
The subtle but significant changes McLaren will make for its 2027 F1 car

Willmott and Thompson on the move in Autosport National Rankings

National
Willmott and Thompson on the move in Autosport National Rankings

Buemi to leave Formula E after 12 seasons

Formula E
London ePrix I
Buemi to leave Formula E after 12 seasons

Why Cadillac has decided to act now and replace Lowdon with Budkowski

Formula 1
Why Cadillac has decided to act now and replace Lowdon with Budkowski

Cadillac confirms Lowdon's shock exit wasn't a "mutual decision"

Formula 1
Cadillac confirms Lowdon's shock exit wasn't a "mutual decision"

F1 2019 changes produced 'worst possible outcome' simulations

Formula 1's 2019 rules changes cost "a few seconds of lap time" and produced "the worst possible outcome" when the Racing Point team completed its first simulations

Simplified front and rear wing regulations will be introduced for 2019 with the aim of improving on-track action by reducing front wing sensitivity in turbulent air and minimising the difficulty of following another car closely.

How F1's quick-fix 2019 rules were born

While the jury is out on whether this will result on better racing and more overtaking, Racing Point technical director Andy Green said the "relatively small" rules change impacted the car's performance and balance "a lot".

"It's been a big hit," he told Autosport. "And when we first put it in the tunnel a few months ago, we're talking a few seconds of lap time, and a poorly balanced car as well.

"It was the worst possible outcome.

"Hopefully, it has some positives with respect to closer racing.

"We, like everyone else, have been trying to crawl our way out of the hole that we jumped into with these new regulations.

"It's significant and it's right up there with, not-quite a complete change of car, but it's pretty close."

Teams have predicted a development race at the start of 2019 specifically in a bid to recover the downforce lost by simplified aero components.

Green argued that the development curve is "really steep" and that during the design of the 2019 car they have been "bringing updates all the time to try and keep on top of the change in performance of the model".

Racing Point is the reincarnation of the Force India team that fell into administration last summer, and Green is not sure that the team would have coped well with the rule changes in its under-resourced previous guise.

"It's a big challenge," said Green. "I wonder if old Force India would have really struggled.

"Significant architectural changes would need to keep being developed throughout the season, we would be struggling.

"We're in a much better place now, it's going to help us."

While the impact on car performance has been clear to see during development work, Green warned that F1 will "struggle to see a big difference following another car".

"I hope I'm wrong, I hope all this work will result in some positives in following another car," he said.

"But for the analysis we've seen, it looks relatively small."

Previous article Mick Schumacher close to Ferrari F1 junior deal for 2019
Next article Ferrari president denies talk of F1 team management 'rupture'

Top Comments