Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Mercedes reveals conclusions after costly DNFs in recent F1 races

Formula 1
Barcelona-Catalunya GP
Mercedes reveals conclusions after costly DNFs in recent F1 races

Ferrari to introduce new F1 fuel and engine updates in Austria

Formula 1
Austrian GP
Ferrari to introduce new F1 fuel and engine updates in Austria

MotoGP’s own ‘Concorde Agreement’ is finally official

MotoGP
Czech GP
MotoGP’s own ‘Concorde Agreement’ is finally official

Mercedes explains why it won't challenge Russell's Monaco GP penalties

Formula 1
Monaco GP
Mercedes explains why it won't challenge Russell's Monaco GP penalties

Supercars Darwin: Waters takes first win of 2026 as Ford sweeps top five

Supercars
Darwin Triple Crown
Supercars Darwin: Waters takes first win of 2026 as Ford sweeps top five

You Ask The Questions: Robert Kubica

Feature
Formula 1
You Ask The Questions: Robert Kubica

What to expect – and what not to – from Red Bull's Austria upgrade

Formula 1
Austrian GP
What to expect – and what not to – from Red Bull's Austria upgrade

Mercedes withdraws Russell Monaco GP penalty review request

Formula 1
Monaco GP
Mercedes withdraws Russell Monaco GP penalty review request

Russian GP: Horner says FIA is wrong about engine parity

The FIA's criteria for calculating whether Formula 1 engine performance has converged is flawed, according to Red Bull boss Christian Horner

Last year, F1's manufacturers and the FIA agreed to work towards engine parity with the leading three engines - from Mercedes, Ferrari and Renault - all within a 0.3-second bracket based on a theoretical lap of the Barcelona circuit.

Followed detailed analysis, using "a very detailed methodology for simulating this based on all the data", the FIA believes this has been achieved.

But Horner, whose Renault-powered Red Bull team was 1.711s off the pace of Ferrari polesitter Sebastian Vettel in Russia, questioned the FIA's formula.

"The problem is the methodology behind that," he told Autosport.

"Any lap that's half a second quicker gets discounted.

"It's a very convenient formula.

"Realistically you've only got to look at the spreads here to see that's not the case.

"It's quite clear that the FIA don't really want to get involved in it, so the numbers fit accordingly."

Red Bull's Max Verstappen agreed with his team boss and said the gap was bigger than 0.3s.

"I heard how they did the calculation so if you cancel out all the fast laps with good power, the full power modes - you can't calculate like that," he said.

"At the end of the day, as a team, we know where we have to improve and that's both chassis and engine.

"It's definitely more than [three tenths] I can tell you."

Daniel Ricciardo repeated his team-mate's claim, stressing: "I'd put money on that."

Toro Rosso's Carlos Sainz said he "nearly laughed" when he read the FIA's verdict and comments from Force India's Sergio Perez who said Ferrari and Renault had caught Mercedes.

"I saw news coming out this week about the FIA that the top three engines are within three tenths and I nearly put a comment on Twitter laughing at it," said the Spaniard after qualifying 11th.

"And then [Force India's Sergio] Perez saying 'yes, it's true, it's true'.

"I nearly laughed at it - I think Max also nearly laughed.

"We've made progress, Renault has made progress.

"If not [Nico] Hulkenberg would not be where he is, but we are definitely not closer than half a second compared to Mercedes, especially in qualifying.

"In the race it's not that bad, but in qualifying the Mercedes engine has half a second or more."

Previous article Haas's Romain Grosjean fears "long and painful" Russian Grand Prix
Next article Russian GP: Palmer says qualifying crash happened under pressure

Top Comments