Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Indecent proposal? How Sainz's big idea to change F1 qualifying might work

Feature
Formula 1
British GP
Indecent proposal? How Sainz's big idea to change F1 qualifying might work

Why Ferrari fears "deficit could be twice as big" to Mercedes at Silverstone and Spa

Formula 1
British GP
Why Ferrari fears "deficit could be twice as big" to Mercedes at Silverstone and Spa

How "charging station" Silverstone will really look different in F1 2026

Formula 1
British GP
How "charging station" Silverstone will really look different in F1 2026

Alonso denies claim that Aston Martin's Hungarian GP upgrade will decide his F1 future

Formula 1
British GP
Alonso denies claim that Aston Martin's Hungarian GP upgrade will decide his F1 future

Dixon to leave Chip Ganassi Racing at end of 2026 IndyCar season

IndyCar
Mid-Ohio
Dixon to leave Chip Ganassi Racing at end of 2026 IndyCar season

Kay back to the top of Autosport National Rankings table

National
Kay back to the top of Autosport National Rankings table

Alonso: Silverstone will be "not fun to drive" with 2026 F1 cars

Formula 1
British GP
Alonso: Silverstone will be "not fun to drive" with 2026 F1 cars

Motorsport UK and BRDC unite to develop young British drivers

National
Motorsport UK and BRDC unite to develop young British drivers

Vodafone Denies Jordan Claims

Vodafone hit back today in its 150 million-pound ($252.3 million) High Court battle with Formula One racing team Jordan, which claims the mobile phone giant wrongly pulled out of a sponsorship deal.

Vodafone hit back today in its 150 million-pound ($252.3 million) High Court battle with Formula One racing team Jordan, which claims the mobile phone giant wrongly pulled out of a sponsorship deal.

Launching its defence, Vodafone said it did not enter into a binding three-year agreement with Jordan as a result of a telephone conversation between its global branding director David Haines and the racing team's boss Eddie Jordan.

Jordan had earlier argued that Haines told Jordan 'You've got the deal' and that, based on previous negotiations between the parties, this statement constituted a binding agreement.

Vodafone claims that, while it conducted discussions with Jordan and four other Formula One constructors in 2001, no agreement was reached with Jordan and no binding contract existed.

It says that as of March 22, 2001 when the conversation between Haines and Jordan is alleged to have taken place, Jordan was aware that many essential terms of any such agreement remained unresolved and that Vodafone had yet to discuss any Formula One sponsorship proposals with its governing bodies.

It claims that, in a letter written after that date, Eddie Jordan recognised that any sponsorship agreement would have to be in writing, and that other correspondence shows that the race team were aware that no agreement had been reached.

It says it is unheard of in Formula One circles for such an important deal to be concluded verbally, and that Jordan was aware that no sponsorship agreement of this value would be entered into in such a way.

It also argues that Haines, who was travelling in the back of a car in Germany at the time, had neither actual nor ostensible authority to conclude a deal of this magnitude, and at no time held himself out to Jordan as having that authority.

The hearing continues.

Previous article Schumacher: 'I deserve to be leading'
Next article McLaren misses Silverstone test

Top Comments

Latest news