Toro Rosso's Kvyat "100% disagrees" with less F1 testing proposal

Toro Rosso driver Daniil Kvyat says he "100% disagrees" with Formula 1's mooted pre-season testing reduction, while new Red Bull driver Alex Albon says F1 needs to "respect rookies"

Toro Rosso's Kvyat "100% disagrees" with less F1 testing proposal

With the 2020 grand prix calendar set to expand to 22 races, F1 is believed to be heading towards a revamped testing schedule, with options such as a single five-day test week or six days across two weeks proposed to replace the current eight-day arrangement.

Kvyat is convinced, however, that either of these moves would be wrong for F1, as they would mean the balance between real on-track testing and simulator work for an F1 driver would shift further towards the latter.

"I disagree with that [idea] completely, to be honest, because we already have too little testing," Kvyat said.

"I mean, we should do more real driving, rather than simulator driving. I 100% disagree with that.

"What we are doing now is a minimum from a driver point of view.

"I am not too keen to drive in a simulator, I'd rather do a lot more test days and travel even [more].

"This is not the way Formula 1 should be. We should be driving.

"This is the only sport where we practice so little outside the racing weekend.

"Maybe I am not saying [it needs to be] as much as it was in the past with free testing, but we shouldn't get less than now, I think."

Kvyat believes that the ideal amount of official testing per year lies somewhere "between 16 and 20" days, as opposed to the current 12 days.

"But then also the amount of races will increase next year, so it goes a bit against it, but then maybe simulator should be reduced or something. I don't know.

"But me as a driver I would rather [prefer] so much more [to] drive the real car on a real track, than do this simulator job. No way!"

Kvyat's now-former team-mate Albon has likewise argued against a reduction in testing, believing it would adversely affect newcomers to grand prix racing.

"I think it's the wrong way, to be honest," said new Red Bull Racing driver Albon.

"I know we've got budget cuts and everything like that but you also have to respect rookies, I think.

"In the end it has to be for cost reasons, which I kind of understand, but the big teams, when they're not testing, then they invest the money in software, et cetera, and they'll always spend the money elsewhere to develop simulations to simulate testing.

"So I kind of understand the reason but I wouldn't wish anyone to be a rookie and to only do that amount of testing."

shares
comments
Sainz has dodged a Red Bull-et

Previous article

Sainz has dodged a Red Bull-et

Next article

McLaren boosted by earlier start on '20 F1 car than in recent years

McLaren boosted by earlier start on '20 F1 car than in recent years
Load comments
The forgotten F1 comeback that began Jordan’s odyssey  Plus

The forgotten F1 comeback that began Jordan’s odyssey 

Before Michael Schumacher – or anyone else – had driven the 191
 (or 911 as it was initially called), Eddie Jordan turned to a fellow Irishman to test his new Formula 1 car. JOHN WATSON, a grand prix winner for Penske and McLaren, recalls his role in the birth of a legend…

The squandered potential of a 70s F1 underdog Plus

The squandered potential of a 70s F1 underdog

A podium finisher in its first outing but then never again, the BRM P201 was a classic case of an opportunity squandered by disorganisation and complacency, says STUART CODLING

Formula 1
Sep 18, 2021
The other notable Monza escape that F1 should learn from Plus

The other notable Monza escape that F1 should learn from

OPINION: The headlines were dominated by the Italian Grand Prix crash between Max Verstappen and Lewis Hamilton, who had the halo to thank for avoiding potentially serious injury. But two days earlier, Formula 1 had a lucky escape with a Monza pitlane incident that could also have had grave consequences

Formula 1
Sep 17, 2021
How Monza only added more questions to F1's sprint race conundrum Plus

How Monza only added more questions to F1's sprint race conundrum

With two sprint races under its belt, Formula 1 must now consider its options for them going forward. While they've helped deliver exciting racing on Sundays, the sprints themselves have been somewhat lacking - creating yet another conundrum for F1 to solve...

Formula 1
Sep 16, 2021
Who should Alfa Romeo sign for 2022's F1 season? Plus

Who should Alfa Romeo sign for 2022's F1 season?

OPINION: With Valtteri Bottas already signed up for 2022, all eyes are on the race for the second seat at Alfa Romeo next year. Antonio Giovinazzi is the current incumbent, but faces a tough competition from appealing short and long-term prospects

Formula 1
Sep 15, 2021
The "forced break" that was key to Ricciardo's Monza excellence Plus

The "forced break" that was key to Ricciardo's Monza excellence

OPINION: Daniel Ricciardo has long been considered one of Formula 1’s elite drivers. But his struggles at McLaren since switching from Renault for 2021 have been painful to watch at times. Yet he’s recovered to banish those memories with a famous Monza win – built on a critically important foundation

Formula 1
Sep 14, 2021
How Verstappen is ruining his F1 title battle with Hamilton Plus

How Verstappen is ruining his F1 title battle with Hamilton

OPINION: The Italian GP clash between Lewis Hamilton and Max Verstappen followed a running theme in the 2021 Formula 1 title fight. Their close-quarters battles have often resulted in contact - and although Hamilton has shown a willingness to back off, Verstappen must learn to temper his aggression

Formula 1
Sep 14, 2021
Italian Grand Prix Driver Ratings Plus

Italian Grand Prix Driver Ratings

Two drivers produced maximum-score performances as, for the second year in a row, Monza threw up an unpredictable result that left several others ruing what might have been

Formula 1
Sep 13, 2021