The can of worms opened by Magnussen's Miami F1 sprint antics
Kevin Magnussen's antics during the Miami Grand Prix weekend have left the Haas driver two points away from an F1 race ban. But it was his driving in the sprint race that has exposed a potential flaw in the penalty system, as JAKE BOXALL-LEGGE writes.
"All the penalties were well deserved. No doubt about it. But I had to play the game again," Magnussen told Sky Sports after the Miami Grand Prix sprint race. "I started using these stupid tactics, which I don’t like doing, but at the end of the day, I did my job as a team player. Nico scored his points because I got that gap for him. Lewis [Hamilton] and [Yuki] Tsunoda couldn’t catch him. Not the way I like to go racing, at all, but [it was] what I had to do today."
Let's recap the events of Miami's sprint, since they've likely become lost among the post-grand prix reaction. Something of a kerfuffle at the first corner between Lewis Hamilton, Fernando Alonso, and Lance Stroll ended up knocking Lando Norris out of the race, and the subsequent jostle for position in the midfield rather shuffled the pack. Nico Hulkenberg and Magnussen benefitted and moved up to seventh and eighth, the final two points-paying positions in Saturday's shorter race.
Given the current state of Formula 1's 2024 season, it's become increasingly difficult for the teams not considered to be among the 'Big Five' to collect points. Haas was in an important position, particularly as RB - currently its main rival in the battle for sixth in the constructors' championship - was set for a decent payday with Daniel Ricciardo flying high in fourth.
PLUS: Miami Grand Prix Driver Ratings 2024
Of course, Haas would have preferred to keep both drivers in their positions, but containing Hamilton and Tsunoda was going to be a challenge. Further to that, Magnussen was experiencing the higher tyre degradation of the two VF-24s, his grasp of eighth place becoming increasingly more tenuous as the silver-tinged nose of Hamilton began to cast a larger reflection in the Dane's mirrors. It appeared that it was time for Magnussen to reprise a role he'd reluctantly played earlier in the season.
In March's Saudi Arabian Grand Prix, Magnussen had come under scrutiny for his aggressively defensive tactics. Encumbered by a pair of 10-second penalties, he was converted into a sacrificial lamb; he was tasked with holding a pack of cars behind him in an effort to help team-mate Nico Hulkenberg clear a space to pit and rejoin in points contention. Hulkenberg, who had stayed out behind the sixth-lap safety car and still needed to change tyres, duly found a 21-second gap.
The gambit had been enough to get Haas off the mark for the season. Parking the bus? Yes, overwhelmingly - but it worked. Magnussen's defence had perhaps been excessively robust, particularly in a chicane-hopping reclamation of position from Yuki Tsunoda and his guidance of Alex Albon towards the wall, but came with a valuable net result for the Haas team.
The Magnussen Line was hence deployed again in Miami. In truth, Magnussen was hoping to be pulled along by Hulkenberg with DRS, but the German had instead scarpered 1.5s up the road by the eighth lap and left his team-mate to keep Hamilton at bay. This was when the penalties started to flood in, akin to Bromley's National League play-off win against Solihull Moors.
Magnussen leads Hamilton in the Miami GP sprint race
Photo by: Mark Sutton / Motorsport Images
Penalty, the first: Magnussen skipped the Turn 14/15 chicane after repelling a Hamilton effort into Turn 11, and was deemed to have gained an advantage by doing so. 10 seconds were added to his race time.
Penalty, the second: Hamilton had the inside line for Turn 11 and looked set to wrest control of eighth place. Magnussen braked late and went off-track, and stayed off the road to steal inside for the next corner to keep hold of position. A small degree of contact was made between the two drivers in the process - and a further 10-second penalty was awarded to Magnussen.
Penalty, the third: Hamilton appeared to have overtaken Magnussen for position, again at Turn 11, but Magnussen released the brakes slightly to carry more speed into the corner and draw alongside Hamilton. Both cars went off track, crucially allowing Magnussen to baulk Hamilton and retain position off-track once more. Guess what he got for doing so. That's right - 10 seconds, but with the added bonus of three penalty points applied to his licence.
Penalty, the fourth: Magnussen was shown the black-and-white flag for driving standards, but subsequently left the track a fourth time. This earned an automatic five-second penalty.
"We wanted to investigate if the driver of Car 20 was deliberately flouting the regulations to gain an advantage for his team." Stewards' report
In just 19 laps, Magnussen had accrued four penalties, totalling 35 seconds. That's 0.21 penalties per lap, or 1.8s a lap worth of deductions for the sprint. But his dealings with the FIA stewards weren't quite over, as the quotes at the top of this piece suddenly became known to them: he was also under investigation for unsporting behaviour. The stewards noted that, "We were also aware of the impact that these infringements potentially had on the time gaps to the cars in front, in particular Car 20’s team-mate in Car 27." Magnussen's defence, like his approach in Jeddah, had cemented Hulkenberg's seventh place in the sprint to ensure Haas could benefit from two extra points in its 2024 account.
The stewards' report continued, stating that "We therefore wanted to investigate if the driver of Car 20 was deliberately flouting the regulations to gain an advantage for his team or his teammate and if so, whether such conduct would be an infringement of Article 12.2.1.L of the FIA International Sporting Code."
This particular article states that "Any infringement of the principles of fairness in Competition, behaviour in an unsportsmanlike manner or attempt to influence the result of a Competition in a way that is contrary to sporting ethics."
Albon was inconvenienced by similar tactics at the Saudi Arabian GP
Photo by: Mark Sutton / Motorsport Images
The manner in which this is written is open to interpretation, and could be viewed as somewhat nebulous given the definition of "sporting ethics" is subjective. Magnussen argued, according to the stewards' report, "that building a gap between himself and the cars ahead was perfectly within the regulations and it was not uncommon for a driver to seek to assist his team-mate in the course of a race by doing so. He did not at any point in time think that what he was doing was wrong or that it was in any way unsportsmanlike."
It was noted by the FIA that "the standard for establishing unsportsmanlike behaviour must undoubtedly be high" and thus Magnussen was cleared of that investigation, although the governing body also suggested that the regulations may need to be reviewed to discourage any repeats.
This was something that Alex Albon touched upon following Magnussen's performance in Jeddah, as the Williams driver theorised that this opened a can of worms and could be exploited again in the valuable battles for points among the bottom half of the field. He rather called that one, in retrospect - even if he'd praised Magnussen's efforts at the time.
However, this was not the only metallic receptacle of bilateral invertebrates that was pried open in Miami. The obfuscatory nature of defining "unsporting behaviour" was shoved into the limelight by McLaren team principal Andrea Stella, who had one of his charges pinged by that rule last year: Norris had fallen foul of that regulation in Canada during the safety car period, where he was deemed to have slowed down excessively to allow a gap to form between himself and Oscar Piastri. This was in a bid to assist the McLaren pitcrew with a clean double-stack pitstop.
Although the rules regarding car position under the safety car are a bit more stringently measured, one example being that Sebastian Vettel lost a win after falling over 10 car lengths behind the safety car at Hungary in 2010, Stella contended that Magnussen's tactics were "intentional in terms of damaging another competitor" and were worthy of a ban.
"For me, it is actually relatively simple this case, because we have a case of a behaviour being intentional in terms of damaging another competitor and this behaviour is perpetuated within the same race and repeated over the same season," the Italian suggested.
"How can penalties be accumulative? They should be exponential. It is not five plus five plus five equals 15. Five plus five plus five equals maybe you need to spend a weekend at home with your family and reflect on your sportsmanship and then go back.
McLaren team principal Stella was less than impressed with Magnussen's tactics
Photo by: Mark Sutton / Motorsport Images
"If you see that you become loyal, fair and sportsmanlike – whatever you say in English – to your fellow competitors then you can stay in this business. It is completely unacceptable.
"I guess the penalty points are still in place, I don’t know exactly the situation for some drivers, I have to confess, but it definitely may mean that the metrics might have to be adjusted. Damaging intentionally the race of a competitor just makes no sense from a sportsmanship point of view and this should be addressed immediately because if you are out of the points, you get 20s or whatever at the end of your race, it doesn’t make any difference.
"But for the competitors you have damaged you have put them out of their race. Again, in a deliberate, perpetuated and repeated way. This is completely unacceptable."
His point is compelling and, taking into account that Magnussen repeatedly retained position off-track, the rules were frequently flaunted throughout. There's nuance between the Haas driver's tactics in Jeddah and those in Miami; for the most part, Magnussen held up the pack behind him without needing to cut corners. Sure, he'd stayed ahead of Tsunoda in that manner and earned the 10 seconds for doing so, but it was only after that when his hold-up play was pressed into service. This time, Magnussen started to play the 'team game' and earned the penalties in the process.
That's where the two races differ and, if a driver is intentionally drifting outside of the given rules of engagement in the knowledge that penalties will be likely, then it's fair that the notion of "sporting behaviour" should be questioned.
Ultimately, the bottom line is that racing in F1 should not be over-policed and, although the drivers tend to cry foul on the radio at the merest hint of being raced hard, they enjoy it for the most part. But there's a difference between hard racing on-track and being raced off of it, and that's something that the governing body needs to delineate between. A driver cannot be allowed to simply ignore the white lines to help a team-mate score points or win.
Perhaps it also exposes a fault with the penalty system. In a race with no pitstops, a time penalty has little consequence for anything other than the final finishing positions, and the drivers caught behind another deliberately going off-road to hang onto a place don't get the time they'd lost back. Drive-through penalties might be a more obtuse deterrent for those kinds of situations: it frees up the affected driver behind, and moves the offending driver out of the scene of combat to halt further offences. But that's just a thought...
Hulkenberg prospered from his team-mate's tactics
Photo by: Steven Tee / Motorsport Images
Subscribe and access Autosport.com with your ad-blocker.
From Formula 1 to MotoGP we report straight from the paddock because we love our sport, just like you. In order to keep delivering our expert journalism, our website uses advertising. Still, we want to give you the opportunity to enjoy an ad-free and tracker-free website and to continue using your adblocker.
Top Comments