Teams reject Ferrari proposals
Team bosses have rejected Ferrari's 2005 testing proposals at a meeting at Heathrow in London on Monday. The nine teams have instead vowed to continue to discuss the plans they have put forward in their previous meetings without the support of the world champions
Ferrari handed its own set of testing proposals to F1 supremo Bernie Ecclestone rather than attend the meeting. Included in the proposals was a limit of 15,000 kilometres of testing per team at a nominated track with a further 15,000kms permitted for tyre suppliers Bridgestone and Michelin to conduct their own testing split between their teams (Click HERE for separate story).
However, the teams viewed Ferrari's proposals as "not terribly fair" and have decided to press ahead with their own plans that have been discussed in the last three meetings without Ferrari.
This means teams will stick to their original proposal of a limited 24 days of testing during the season unless there is a last minute change of heart from Ferrari to sign up to the proposal put forward in Brazil which limited testing to 10 days during the season with four hours of practice on a Friday.
Teams also agreed to meet in early January to discuss proposals to limit Formula 1 to a single tyre supplier from 2006. Although this date goes beyond the December 31 deadline previously talked about to give the tyre manufacturers 12 months notice about a change in their supply terms, the nine teams present felt that both Bridgestone and Michelin had been given enough warning already about the plan and that legally if a decision was made in early January to go to a control tyre then the two companies would have to accept.
One team boss said: "It was only a moral obligation to give them more than 12 months warning, legally they would have a hard time arguing that any decision made next January is unfair."
Minardi team boss Paul Stoddart added: "It was a very encouraging meeting. We've had three meetings on the trot now where we have achieved out target and we're working solidly to reducing costs in F1. It is saddening, however, that in those three meetings we have not seen Ferrari and we would rather they were on the inside than on the outside. We would rather have them with us."
The ‘backwards step’ that is the right move for Formula 1
OPINION: With its days apparently numbered, the MGU-H looks set to be dropped from Formula 1’s future engine rules in order to entice new manufacturers in. While it may appear a change of direction, the benefits for teams and fans could make the decision a worthwhile call
The floundering fortunes of F1’s many Lotus reboots
Team Lotus ceased to exist in 1994 - and yet various parties have been trying to resurrect the hallowed name, in increasingly unrecognisable forms, ever since. DAMIEN SMITH brings GP Racing’s history of the legendary team to an end with a look at those who sought to keep the flame alive in Formula 1
Why the 2021 title fight is far from F1's worst, despite its toxic background
OPINION: Formula 1 reconvenes for the Russian Grand Prix two weeks after the latest blow in ‘Max Verstappen vs Lewis Hamilton’. While the Silverstone and Monza incidents were controversial, they thankfully lacked one element that so far separates the 2021 title fight from the worst examples of ugly championship battles
How F1’s other champion to emerge from 1991 thrived at Lotus
Mika Hakkinen became Michael Schumacher’s biggest rival in Formula 1 in the late-90s and early 2000s, having also made his F1 debut in 1991. But as MARK GALLAGHER recalls, while Schumacher wowed the world with a car that was eminently capable, Hakkinen was fighting to make his mark with a famous team in terminal decline
The forgotten F1 comeback that began Jordan’s odyssey
Before Michael Schumacher – or anyone else – had driven the 191 (or 911 as it was initially called), Eddie Jordan turned to a fellow Irishman to test his new Formula 1 car. JOHN WATSON, a grand prix winner for Penske and McLaren, recalls his role in the birth of a legend…
The squandered potential of a 70s F1 underdog
A podium finisher in its first outing but then never again, the BRM P201 was a classic case of an opportunity squandered by disorganisation and complacency, says STUART CODLING
The other notable Monza escape that F1 should learn from
OPINION: The headlines were dominated by the Italian Grand Prix crash between Max Verstappen and Lewis Hamilton, who had the halo to thank for avoiding potentially serious injury. But two days earlier, Formula 1 had a lucky escape with a Monza pitlane incident that could also have had grave consequences
How Monza only added more questions to F1's sprint race conundrum
With two sprint races under its belt, Formula 1 must now consider its options for them going forward. While they've helped deliver exciting racing on Sundays, the sprints themselves have been somewhat lacking - creating yet another conundrum for F1 to solve...
