Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Canadian Grand Prix Driver Ratings 2026

Formula 1
Canadian GP
Canadian Grand Prix Driver Ratings 2026

How Ferrari and Audi could decide Verstappen's F1 future

Feature
Formula 1
Canadian GP
How Ferrari and Audi could decide Verstappen's F1 future

Antonelli takes a decisive step in Montreal's all-action thriller

Feature
Formula 1
Canadian GP
Antonelli takes a decisive step in Montreal's all-action thriller

Russell "lost for words" after heartbreaking Canadian GP exit

Formula 1
Canadian GP
Russell "lost for words" after heartbreaking Canadian GP exit

F1 Canadian GP: Antonelli lands F1 2026 blow as Russell retires in Montreal

Formula 1
Canadian GP
F1 Canadian GP: Antonelli lands F1 2026 blow as Russell retires in Montreal

Russell suffers dramatic exit from F1 Canada GP

Formula 1
Canadian GP
Russell suffers dramatic exit from F1 Canada GP

Rosenqvist wins 2026 Indy 500 in closest-ever finish

IndyCar
110th Running of the Indianapolis 500
Rosenqvist wins 2026 Indy 500 in closest-ever finish

LIVE: F1 Canadian Grand Prix updates - Antonelli leads as Russell and Norris among six retirees

Formula 1
Canadian GP
LIVE: F1 Canadian Grand Prix updates - Antonelli leads as Russell and Norris among six retirees

Michelin: Two stops are the way to go

Teams at Indianapolis are likely to go for two pit stops on Sunday's Grand Prix. That's the view of Michelin's F1 programme manager Pascal Vasselon.

"A two-stop strategy will probably be the favoured strategy here, given that the fuel weight penalty is relatively slight - less than 0.3 seconds per lap for every extra 10kg. Pit stops are also relatively swift, with a pit visit taking about 28 seconds."

Vasselon also highlighted yet another way in which Indianapolis is a track of two halves. In addition to the obvious differences between the infield and the banking, and the aerodynamic set-up compromise this requires, there is also the surface to consider.

"The surface on the banking is very abrasive. The infield, on the other hand, is fairly smooth. That is the most significant contrast between the two different parts of the track."

Michelin motorsport director Pierre Dupasquier added that, rather like its partner McLaren, Monza was a good showing considering it was not a suitable track for Michelins.

"We knew the previous race in Monza would place a greater emphasis on aerodynamics than on the relationship between a chassis and its tyres. In circumstances that perhaps favoured our main rival our partners proved to be extremely competitive.

"We're aiming to use cutting-edge tyre technology at Indianapolis to help our partners overcome the aerodynamic dilemma."

Michelin will be bringing similar tyres to those used at Monza. They'll be based on the new constructions developed during the tyres controversy in the Italian Grand Prix build-up.

Previous article Indianapolis Will be a Thriller, Says Schumacher
Next article Ask Nigel Roebuck: September 24

Top Comments