Mercedes' F1 gearbox troubles explained

Mercedes' recent gearbox reliability concerns in Formula 1 were a result of the team being too aggressive with its seamless-shift system in a bid to overhaul Ferrari

Mercedes' F1 gearbox troubles explained

Lewis Hamilton and Valtteri Bottas both had to serve five-place grid penalties for taking new gearboxes ahead of schedule in Austria and Great Britain respectively, with Mercedes admitting over the Silverstone weekend it had reverted to a "safe spec" to avoid any repeats of the problems.

Mercedes technical director James Allison said that the team's bid to extract every element of performance out of the car had resulted in it pushing too hard to shave milliseconds off its shift times.

"In the old days, you'd be in a gear, then you'd be out of a gear and then you'd be in another gear and you'd just lose drive all the time that the gears were in transit from one to the other," he explained.

"In a seamless shift you are in one gear and then the next one takes over instantly - so there isn't a loss of drive.

"But seamless though it is, there is still an amount of spinning stuff that needs to be slowed down to meet the next gear.

"The harsh [way to do that] is just letting rip. I can say this because it's not a sort of thing that no-one else has thought of, it's a standard thing in F1.

"It's just a question of how bold you are with it."

While Mercedes has a thorough reliability sign off when it comes to development, Allison says the team was caught out by the real world throwing up things - like g-forces - that cannot be simulated on dynos.

"We have a process for signing off any new strategy or any new design and that process is actually quite cautious from an engineering point of view," he said.

"We try to put it on the track as much as we can, but the opportunities for track running in a risk-free way are limited.

"So we have dynamometers back in the factory where we can create a fairly good representation of reality.

"We did all of our normal process to prove off a layer of greater aggression with the shift settings than we had used previously.

"But, despite the fact that everything looked fine in our sign off process, sadly that particular plan didn't survive contact with the enemy on the track - where things were a little different, where the g-loads moved the oil around the box differently than you can simulate in a dynamometer.

"So we just overstepped the mark by the tiniest of margins and paid a price."

Battling Ferrari

Mercedes boss Toto Wolff admitted that the added pressure from Ferrari in 2017 has forced Mercedes to push even harder to find performance gains.

"It is probably better for the sport and for the entertainment factor that Ferrari is part of the mix now, but we are pushing so hard," he said.

"And by pushing and trying to keep the development curve steep, you get setbacks.

"Headrests that become undone, gearboxes that break because you try to extract the last bit of bits that normally have no performance relevance any more, or not a lot. But they do."

Wolff said another area that allows for small, but ultimately significant gains to be found, comes from fuel and lubricants supplier Petronas.

"For me, it is amazing that there are fluids you can extract performance from that I didn't even know were in the car," he said.

"And it adds up. You can find five milliseconds on a cooling product, you can find 15 milliseconds on a hydraulic oil.

"With the formula of oils and fuels and the density, you can extract so much more performance out of all these crucial parts of the internal combustion engine.

"The gearbox is another good example. Running the right oil in the gearbox can give you a performance advantage, it can give you a weight advantage, it can allow you to race more aggressively in terms of gearshifts.

"And sometimes as a team you get over-confident.

"That has happened to us on the gearbox. We've probably run it too hard and when we stuck the nose in after Baku we realised."

shares
comments
Britain's first five-time home grand prix hero

Previous article

Britain's first five-time home grand prix hero

Next article

Force India starts talks with Sergio Perez for 2018 Formula 1 season

Force India starts talks with Sergio Perez for 2018 Formula 1 season
Load comments
The floundering fortunes of F1’s many Lotus reboots Plus

The floundering fortunes of F1’s many Lotus reboots

Team Lotus ceased to exist in 1994 - and yet various parties have been trying to resurrect the hallowed name, in increasingly unrecognisable forms, ever since. DAMIEN SMITH brings GP Racing’s history of the legendary team to an end with a look at those who sought to keep the flame alive in Formula 1

Why the 2021 title fight is far from F1's worst, despite its toxic background Plus

Why the 2021 title fight is far from F1's worst, despite its toxic background

OPINION: Formula 1 reconvenes for the Russian Grand Prix two weeks after the latest blow in ‘Max Verstappen vs Lewis Hamilton’. While the Silverstone and Monza incidents were controversial, they thankfully lacked one element that so far separates the 2021 title fight from the worst examples of ugly championship battles

How F1’s other champion to emerge from 1991 thrived at Lotus Plus

How F1’s other champion to emerge from 1991 thrived at Lotus

Mika Hakkinen became Michael Schumacher’s biggest rival in Formula 1 in the late-90s and early 2000s, having also made his F1 debut in 1991. But as MARK GALLAGHER recalls, while Schumacher wowed the world with a car that was eminently capable, Hakkinen was fighting to make his mark with a famous team in terminal decline

Formula 1
Sep 21, 2021
The forgotten F1 comeback that began Jordan’s odyssey  Plus

The forgotten F1 comeback that began Jordan’s odyssey 

Before Michael Schumacher – or anyone else – had driven the 191 (or 911 as it was initially called), Eddie Jordan turned to a fellow Irishman to test his new Formula 1 car. JOHN WATSON, a grand prix winner for Penske and McLaren, recalls his role in the birth of a legend…

Formula 1
Sep 20, 2021
The squandered potential of a 70s F1 underdog Plus

The squandered potential of a 70s F1 underdog

A podium finisher in its first outing but then never again, the BRM P201 was a classic case of an opportunity squandered by disorganisation and complacency, says STUART CODLING

Formula 1
Sep 18, 2021
The other notable Monza escape that F1 should learn from Plus

The other notable Monza escape that F1 should learn from

OPINION: The headlines were dominated by the Italian Grand Prix crash between Max Verstappen and Lewis Hamilton, who had the halo to thank for avoiding potentially serious injury. But two days earlier, Formula 1 had a lucky escape with a Monza pitlane incident that could also have had grave consequences

Formula 1
Sep 17, 2021
How Monza only added more questions to F1's sprint race conundrum Plus

How Monza only added more questions to F1's sprint race conundrum

With two sprint races under its belt, Formula 1 must now consider its options for them going forward. While they've helped deliver exciting racing on Sundays, the sprints themselves have been somewhat lacking - creating yet another conundrum for F1 to solve...

Formula 1
Sep 16, 2021
Who should Alfa Romeo sign for 2022's F1 season? Plus

Who should Alfa Romeo sign for 2022's F1 season?

OPINION: With Valtteri Bottas already signed up for 2022, all eyes are on the race for the second seat at Alfa Romeo next year. Antonio Giovinazzi is the current incumbent, but faces a tough competition from appealing short and long-term prospects

Formula 1
Sep 15, 2021